Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wp2c8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-16T14:56:13.221Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ceramic Technoindgy and Problems of Social Evolution in Southwestern Iran

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

M. James Blackman
M. James Blackman*
Affiliation:
Conservation Analytical Laboratory, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. 20560
Get access

Extract

The use of the technology of manufacture of a class of artifacts as data to address questions of culture process {social evolution} is fraught with pitfalls. This is especially true with ceramic technology. The study of this type of artifact begins with a basic circularity for most prehistoric periods in most areas of the world. Many prehistoric chronologies are based on the most abundant and durable artifact, ceramics. Periods or phases are, to a large extent, defined by similarities in form, style, and production methods of these ceramics. Therefore using more refined assessments of the technology of production to assess changes occurring between periods or phases and to infer cultural change is merely reaffirming the cornequences, and reinforcing an image of abrupt step wise progression. This image is of little help in understanding the inner causes and dynamics of social or technological evolution. The use of more refined ceramic technological data to test the validity of a chronology based on ceramic data must be used with great caution.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 123: Symposium L – Materials Issues in Art and Archaeology I , 1988 , 103
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References:

[1] Alden, J. R., Regional econonic organization in Banesh period Iran, PhD dissertation, Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor (1979).Google Scholar
[2] Sumner, W. M., Cultural developments in the Kur River Basin, Iran, PhD dissertation, Univ. of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (1972).Google Scholar
[3] Sumner, W. M., in Proceedings of the first USA/USSR symposium on near eastern archaeology, (in press).Google Scholar
[4] Alden, J. R., in The contextual analysis of prehistoric exchange systems, ed Earle, T. and Ericson, J., Academic Press, N.Y. (1982).Google Scholar
[5] Blackman, M. J., British Museum Occasional Papers No. 19 7–20 (1981).Google Scholar
[6] Nicholas, I., Excavations at Tal-e Malyan, I: The Proto-Elamite settlement at TRV, University Museum of the University of Pennsylvania Monograph Series, Philadelphia, (in press).Google Scholar
[7] Zeder, M. A., Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 7 1–55 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8] Blackman, M. J. and Zeder, M. A., paper presented at 85th Annual Meeting AAA, Philadelphia (1986).Google Scholar