Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-25T01:48:44.314Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Behavior and Influence of Oxygen in Chromium Silicide Formation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

C.-D. Lien
Affiliation:
California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, (U.S.A.)
L. S. WieluŃski*
Affiliation:
California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, (U.S.A.)
M.-A. Nicolet
Affiliation:
California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, (U.S.A.)
K. M. Stika
Affiliation:
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, (U.S.A.)
*
Present address: Department of Electrical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

We investigated the redistribution of oxygen after a thermally induced reaction of an evaporated chromium film deposited on an Si<100> substrate. To monitor the redistribution, 18O was implanted in the metal film or in the silicon substrate. Depth profiles were determined by the isotope-specific reaction 18O (p,α) 15N before and after thermal annealing. Silicide formation was monitored by 2 MeV 4He+ backscattering spectrometry.

It was found that oxygen in the chromium film remains stationary with respect to the chromium during silicide formation, but oxygen in the silicon substrate accumulates at the silicon-silicide interface. The phase formed is CrSi2, as for the unimplanted reference samples. The effect of oxygen on the rate of silicide formation is much more pronounced when the oxygen is in the silicon substrate rather than in the chromium film. This asymmetry is attributed to the fact that silicon is the dominant diffusing species during CrSi2 formation. These results are contrasted with those for nickel and platinum, where the metal moves in the silicide formed by these metals.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Kingzett, T. J. and Ladas, C. A., J. Electrochem. Soc., 122 (1975) 1729.Google Scholar
2 Blattner, R. J., Evans, C. A. Jr., Lau, S. S., Mayer, J. W. and Ullrich, B. M., J. Electrochem. Soc., 122 (1975) 1732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3 Crider, C. A., Poate, J. M. and Rowe, J. E., in Baglin, J. E. E. and Poate, J. M. (eds.), Proc. Symp. on Thin Film Interfaces and Interactions, Vol. 80–2, Electrochemical Society, Princeton, NJ, 1980, p. 135.Google Scholar
4 Crider, C. A., Poate, J. M., Rowe, J. E. and Sheng, T. T., J. Appl. Phys., 52 (1981) 2860.Google Scholar
5 Grunthaner, P. J., Grunthaner, F. J., Scott, D. M., Nicolet, M.-A. and Mayer, J. W., J. Vac. Sci. Technol., 19 (1981) 641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6 Scott, D. M., Grunthaner, P. J., Tsaur, B. Y., Nicolet, M.-A. and Mayer, J. W., in Baglin, J. E. E. and Poate, J. M. (eds.), Proc. Symp. on Thin Film Interfaces and Interactions, Vol. 80–2, Electrochemical Society, Princeton, NJ, 1980, p. 148.Google Scholar
7 Scott, D. M. and Nicolet, M.-A., Nucl. Instrum. Methods, 182183 (1981) 655.Google Scholar
8 Scott, D. M. and Nicolet, M.-A., Phys. Status Solidi A, 66 (1981) 773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9 Scott, D. M., Thesis, California Institute of Technology, 1982.Google Scholar
10 Lien, C.-D., Wieluński, L. and Nicolet, M.-A., Nucl. Instrum. Methods, to be published.Google Scholar
11 Pretorius, R., Harris, J. M. and Nicolet, M.-A., Solid-State Electron., 21 (1978) 667.Google Scholar
12 Nicolet, M.-A. and Lau, S. S., in Larrabee, G. (ed.), Materials and Process Characterization, Vol. 6, VLSI Electronics: Microstructure Science, Academic Press, New York, Chap. 6, in the press.Google Scholar
13 Poate, J. M., Tu, K. N. and Mayer, J. W., Thin Films Interdiffusion and Reactions, Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1978.Google Scholar
14 Olowolafe, J. O., Nicolet, M.-A. and Mayer, J. W., J. Appl. Phys., 47 (1976) 5182.Google Scholar
15 Gibbons, J. F., Johnson, W. S. and Mylroie, S. W., Projected Range Statistics, Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross, Stroudsburg, PA, 1975.Google Scholar