Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-19T01:43:28.406Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Atomic Scale Control of Silicon Surfaces by Hydrofluoric Acid Solutions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

Yukinori Morita
Affiliation:
Electrotechnical Laboratory, 1-1-4 Umezono, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305, Japan
Hiroshi Tokumoto
Affiliation:
Electrotechnical Laboratory, 1-1-4 Umezono, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305, Japan
Get access

Abstract

The scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) images for samples treated by the NH4F (pH=8) solutions exhibited flat terraces and monolayer steps directed toward <112> directions. In addition, there exist two types of surface structures on the same surface: nearly flat parts consisting of terraces with 20-60 nm in width; step-bunched parts consisting of terraces with 1.0-1.5 nm in width which are close to (221) or (332) facets, respectively. The equilibrium width for the large terrace is determined by the competition of two etching processes with weakly-alkaline solutions (pH = 8 ): etching from the step edges and etching on the terrace. On the other hand, the narrow terrace with a few atomic distance is mainly etched from the step edges. In this case, the equilibrium shape is determined by the steric hindrance effect in addition to the anisotropic etching effect which makes the steps uniform.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] See, for example, Chemical Surface Preparation, Passivation and Cleaning for Semiconductor Growth and Processing, ed. Nemanich, R.J., Helms, C.R., Hirose, M. and Rudloff, G.W., (Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings, MRS, Pittsburgh, 1992), Vol. 259, and references therein.Google Scholar
[2] Burrows, V.A., Chabal, Y.J., Higashi, G.S., Raghavachari, K. and Christman, S.B., Appl. Phys. Lett. 53 (1988) 998.Google Scholar
[3] Chabal, Y.J., Higashi, G.S., Raghavachari, K. and Burrows, V.A., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A7 (1989) 2104.Google Scholar
[4] Watanabe, S., Nakayama, N. and Ito, T., Appl. Phys. Lett. 59 (1991) 1458.Google Scholar
[5] Higashi, G.S., Chabal, Y.J., Trucks, G.W. and Raghavachari, K., Appl. Phys. Lett. 56 (1990) 656.Google Scholar
[6] Jakob, P. and Chabal, Y.J., J. Chem. Phys. 95 (1991) 2897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7] Morita, Y., Miki, K. and Tokumoto, H., Appl. Phys. Lett. 59 (1991) 1347.Google Scholar
[8] Morita, Y., Miki, K. and Tokumoto, H., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 30 (1991) 3570.Google Scholar
[9] Morita, Y., Miki, K. and Tokumoto, H., Ultramicroscopy. 42–44 (1992) 922.Google Scholar
[10] Morita, Y., Miki, K. and Tokumoto, H., Appl Surf Sci. 60/61 (1992) 466.Google Scholar
[11] Tokumoto, H., Morita, Y. and Miki, K., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 259 (1992) 409.Google Scholar