Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-rvbq7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T06:43:39.331Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

δ2-Y2Si2O7 Structure Confirmed by Processing and Simulation of Atomic-Resolution Images

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

R.S. Rai
Affiliation:
National Center for Electron Microscopy, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720.
M.A. O'keefe
Affiliation:
National Center for Electron Microscopy, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720.
G. Thomas
Affiliation:
National Center for Electron Microscopy, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720.
Get access

Abstract

High resolution electron micrographs have been obtained in various orientations for δ2-Y2Si2O7 using the Atomic Resolution Microscope (ARM) at the National Center for Electron Microscopy (NCEM). These ARM images were processed by masking the diffractogram of the digitized image in Fourier space and applying an inverse transform (using the SEMPER program at the NCEM Image Analysis Facility) in order to reveal details obscured by amorphous contrast originating in the glassy matrix. Processed experimental images from very thin regions of the crystalline phase were compared with images simulated from postulated models (SHRLI images); close agreement was obtained.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Jack, K.H., Final Technical Reports, “The Role of Additives in the Densification of Nitrogen Ceramics”, for the European Research Office of the United States Army, Grant Number DAERO-76G-067, Novemer, 1987.Google Scholar
2. Clark, D.R. and Thomas, G., J. Amer. Cer. Soc. 61, 114 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Ito, J. and Johnson, H., Amer. Min. 53.1940 (1968).Google Scholar
4. Dinger, T.R., Rai, R.S. and Thomas, G., J. Amer. Cer. Soc. Symp., 71, 236, (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Rai, R.S., OKeefe, M.A. and Thomas, G., Proc. Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. 82, 211 (1987).Google Scholar
6. Smolin, Y.I. and Shepelev, Y.F., Acta Cryst. B 26, 484 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. O'Keefe, M.A., Proc. 45th EMSA, 1987, 364.Google Scholar
8. Saxton, W.O., Pitt, T.J. and Homer, M., Ultramicrosc. 4, 343 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. O.Keefe, M.A., and Buseck, P.R., Trans. Amer. Cryst. Assoc. 15, 27 (1979).Google Scholar
10. Ponce, F.A. and O'Keefe, M.A., Proc. 44th EMSA, 1986, 522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Bovin, J-O., O'Keeffe, M., and O'Keefe, M.A., Acta Cryst. A 37, 42 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Smith, D.J., Saxton, W.O., O'Keefe, M.A., Wood, G.J. and Stobbs, W.M., Ultramicrosc. 11, 263 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar