Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T04:16:23.378Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Shell Model and Interatomic Potentials for Ceramics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2013

Get access

Extract

In a classification of solids according to their bonding character (into metals, ceramics and glasses, polymers, and semiconductors), the ceramic class includes an enormous range of industrially important materials. From the archetypal ionic solids through oxides to silicates, and to covalently bonded materials such as SiC, they exhibit a rich variety of structures and properties. They occur as structural materials, either on their own or as composites such as SiC/Al2O3. They are important functional materials, such as fast-ion conductors as electrolytes in fuel cells (for example ZrO2/Y2O3 for hydrogen combustion) or batteries (β-alumina in the sodium-sulfur battery), ferroelectric materials such as BaTiO3 and piezoelectrics such as PZT—a solid solution of PbTiO3 and PbZrO3. The high-temperature superconductors (for example, YBa2Cu3O7) are ceramics above the superconducting transition temperature. The products of corrosion and oxidation are ionic materials, and the properties of oxide coatings are vital to the survival of high-temperature alloys in gas turbines or fuel-element claddings in nuclear reactors.

To understand the behavior of ceramic materials, and to optimize their production, processing, and application, it is often necessary to model their behavior at an atomic level. In some cases this is obvious. Ionic diffusion in a solid electrolyte is a self-evidently atomic process. In other cases the need for atomistic simulation is less clear. Oxidation, for example, is a subtle blend of atomic diffusion (often along grain boundaries), metal-ceramic bonding, stress relief, and grain growth. The course of oxidation can be spectacularly affected by impurities and alloying, and this can only be understood by considering the atomicscale processes involved.

Type
Interatomic Potentials for Atomistic Simulations
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Cochran, W., The Dynamics of Atoms in Crystals, edited by Arnold, Edward (1973).Google Scholar
2.Dick, B.G. and Overhauser, A.W., Phys. Rev. 112 (1958) p. 603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Wilson, M. and Madden, P.A., J. Phys.: Conden. Matt. 5 (1993) p. 2687.Google Scholar
4.Catlow, C.R.A. and Stoneham, A.M., J. Phys. C: Solid Phys. 16 (1983) p. 4321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Catlow, C.R.A. and Mackrodt, W.C., eds., Computer Simulation of Solids (Springer-Verlag, 1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Wood, C.P. and Pyper, N.C., Chem. Phys. Lett. 81 (1981) p. 395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Pyper, N.C., Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 320 (1986) p. 107.Google Scholar
8.Pyper, N.C., Adv. Solid State Chem. 2 (1991) p. 223.Google Scholar
9.Harding, J.H. and Pyper, N.C., Philos. Mag. Lett. 71 (1995) p. 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Allen, N.L., Cooper, D.L., and Mackrodt, W.C., Mol. Simul. 4 (1990) p. 269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Catlow, C.R.A., Dixon, M., and Mackrodt, W.C., in Reference 5, p. 130.Google Scholar
12.Hoare, J.P., Masri, P., and Tasker, P.W., AERE Report R10752 (1983).Google Scholar
13.Vineyard, G.H., J. Phys. Chem. Solids 3 (1957) p. 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Yang, M.H. and Flynn, C.P., Phys. Rev. Lett. 73 (1994) p. 1809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Harding, J.H., J. Nucl. Mater. 202 (1993) p. 216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Norgett, M.J., Pathak, A.P., and Stoneham, A.M., J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. 10 (1977) p. 555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Duffy, D.M., Harding, J.H., and Stoneham, A.M., Philos. Mag. A 67 (1993) p. 865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Stoneham, A.M., J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. II 85 (1989) p. 505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar