Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T13:48:07.448Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Materials Science of Cosmetics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The cosmetics industry is increasingly using sophisticated materials and technologies in their products and to measure their effectiveness. Understanding how these products interact with skin, adhere to skin, and deliver a benefit or create a visible effect leads to better and safer products. An understanding of the optics and mechanics of skin and the cosmetics–skin interface is important for achieving various visual and functional effects. This issue reviews the underlying science and the technical challenges behind the development of materials for the personal care and cosmetics industry.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2007

References

1.Goddard, E.D., Gruber, J.V., Eds., Principles of Polymer Science and Technology in Cosmetics and Personal Care, Cosmetic Science and Technology Series, vol. 22 (Marcel Dekker, New York, 1999).Google Scholar
2.Barel, A.O., Paye, M., Maibach, H.I., Eds., Handbook of Cosmetic Science and Technology (Marcel Dekker, New York, 2001).Google Scholar
3.Buchmann, S., “Main Cosmetic Vehicles,” in Handbook of Cosmetic Science and Technology, Barel, A.O., Paye, M., Maibach, H.I., Eds. (Marcel Dekker, New York, 2001).Google Scholar
4.Leveque, J., Agache, P.G., Eds., Aging Skin (Marcel Dekker, New York, 1993).Google Scholar
5.Elias, J., in Handbook of Cosmetic Science and Technology, Barel, A.O., Paye, M., Maibach, H.I., Eds. (Marcel Dekker, New York, 2001) pp. 1927.Google Scholar
6.Wester, R.C., Maibach, H.I., in Handbook of Cosmetic Science and Technology, Barel, A.O., Paye, M., Maibach, H.I., Eds. (Marcel Dekker, New York, 2001) pp. 5365.Google Scholar
7. For example, Saidi, I.S., Jacques, S.L., Tittel, F.K., Appl. Opt. 34 7410 (1995); S.L. Jacques, Appl. Opt. 32 2447 (1993).Google Scholar
8.Jansen, J., Maibach, H.I., in Handbook of Cosmetic Science and Technology, Barel, A.O., Paye, M., Maibach, H.I., Eds. (Marcel Dekker, New York, 2001) pp. 171190.Google Scholar
9.Tadros, Th. F., in Principles of Polymer Science and Technology in Cosmetics and Personal Care, vol. 22, Goddard, E.D., Gruber, J.V., Eds. (Marcel Dekker, New York, 1999) pp. 73112.Google Scholar
10.Flynn, G.L., Weiner, N.D., in Dermal and Transdermal Drug Delivery, Gurny, R., Teubner, A., Eds. (Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgeschellschaft, Stuttgart, 1993) p. 44.Google Scholar
11.Hagedorn-Leweke, U., Lippold, B.C., Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 46, 215 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Lademann, J., Weigmann, H., Rickmeyer, C., Barthelmes, H., Schaefer, H., Mueller, G., Sterry, W., Skin Pharmacol. Appl. Skin Physiol. 12, 247 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Kreilgaard, M., Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 54 (Suppl. 1), S77 (2002).Google Scholar
14.Tinkle, S.S., Antonini, J.M., Rich, B.A., Roberts, J.R., Salmen, R., DePree, K., Adkins, E.J., Environ. Health Perspect. 111, 1202 (2003).Google Scholar
15.Grove, G., Grove, M.J., in Handbook of Cosmetic Science and Technology, Barel, A.O., Paye, M., Maibach, H.I., Eds. (Marcel Dekker, New York, 2001) pp. 829835.Google Scholar
16.Sinha, M., Proc. 23rd. Congr. Int. Fed. Societies of Cosmetic Chemists (Orlando, Fla., 2004) pp. 289295.Google Scholar