Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T04:32:28.262Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Microstructural features of compacted MX-80 bentonite after the long-time experiment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 February 2017

Michał Matusewicz ,
Joonas Järvinen ,
Markus Olin  and
Arto Muurinen
Michał Matusewicz*
Affiliation:
VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd., Otakaari 3K, P.O. Box 1000, FI-02044 VTT, Finland
Joonas Järvinen
Affiliation:
VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd., Otakaari 3K, P.O. Box 1000, FI-02044 VTT, Finland
Markus Olin
Affiliation:
VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd., Otakaari 3K, P.O. Box 1000, FI-02044 VTT, Finland
Arto Muurinen
Affiliation:
VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd., Otakaari 3K, P.O. Box 1000, FI-02044 VTT, Finland
*
*(Email: Michal.Matusewicz@vtt.fi)
Get access

Abstract

Bentonite clay is proposed to be a buffer material in the KBS-3 method of deep geological disposal of spent nuclear fuel in Sweden and Finland. It is essential to know the long term behaviour of the material when evaluating the safety performance of the barrier system. Therefore, various experiments and modelling have been carried out with bentonite in different conditions during the last decades. However, most of the laboratory experiments in controlled conditions last less than few years only.

In this study 15 years old compacted MX-80 bentonite samples were studied. They stayed closed in a copper canister in contact with low salinity groundwater both in aerobic and anaerobic conditions. After dismantling the experiment a thorough characterization was carried out, including analysis of chemical composition of bentonite and external solution, clay microstructure, mineralogy and microbial activity.

In this presentation the focus is on the microstructural features of the samples. Small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS), nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and anion exclusion measurement were used to investigate the nano and micro porosity features of the material. The results are compared with similar analysis of MX-80 samples prepared in the laboratory and with short time equilibration with external solution. Calculations based on SAXS data give similar results but there are differences for NMR based results. This could be caused by dissimilarities of between the samples at the mesoscale level. No differences were observed between the oxic and anoxic conditions suggesting no influence of redox conditions on the bentonite microstructure.

Keywords

microstructurewaste managementporosity
Type
Articles
Information
MRS Advances , Volume 1 , Issue 61: Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXXIX , 2016 , pp. 4069 - 4074
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bergaya, F, Lagaly, G, In: Bergaya, F, Theng, BKG, Lagaly, G (Eds.), Developments in Clay Science, Elsevier, 2006, pp. 1–18.Google Scholar
Kiviranta, L, Kumpulainen, S, Quality control and characterization of bentonite materials. (2011).Google Scholar
Delage, P, Marcial, D, Cui, Y, Ruiz, X, Géotechnique. 56 (2006) 291–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melamed, A, Pitkänen, P, VTT TIEDOTTEITA. 1766 (1996).Google Scholar
Muurinen, A, Lehikoinen, J, Melamed, A, Pitkaenen, P, VTT TIEDOTTEITA. 1806 (1996).Google Scholar
Vuorinen, U, Snellman, M, Posiva Working Report. 98 (1998) 41.Google Scholar
Olin, M, Järvinen, J, Matusewicz, M, Tiljander, M, Itälä, A, Rajala, P, et al., Appl.Clay.Sci.. (submitted).Google Scholar
Muurinen, A, Carlsson, T, Root, A, Clay Miner. 48 (2013) 251–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santyr, GE, Henkelman, RM, Bronskill, MJ, Journal of Magnetic Resonance (1969). 79(1988) 28–44.Google Scholar
Carlsson, T, Muurinen, A, Matusewicz, M, Root, A, MRS Symposium Proceedings. 1475 (2012) 397–402.Google Scholar
Matusewicz, M, Pirkkalainen, K, Liljeström, V, Suuronen, J, Root, A, Muurinen, A, et al., Clay Miner. 48 (2013) 267–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolt, G, Warkentin, B, Kolloid-zeitschrift. 156 (1958) 41–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Loon, LR, Glaus, MA, Müller, W, Appl.Geochem. 22 (2007) 2536–2552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar