Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T07:45:51.161Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

In Vitro Bioactivity of AISI 316L Stainless Steel Coated with Hydroxyapatite-Seeded 58S Bioglass

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 October 2019

Jorge López-Cuevas*
Affiliation:
Cinvestav Unidad Saltillo, Calle Industria Metalúrgica No. 1062, Parque Industrial Saltillo - Ramos Arizpe, 25900, Ramos Arizpe, Coahuila, México.
Juan Carlos Rendón-Angeles
Affiliation:
Cinvestav Unidad Saltillo, Calle Industria Metalúrgica No. 1062, Parque Industrial Saltillo - Ramos Arizpe, 25900, Ramos Arizpe, Coahuila, México.
Juan Méndez-Nonell
Affiliation:
Cinvestav Unidad Saltillo, Calle Industria Metalúrgica No. 1062, Parque Industrial Saltillo - Ramos Arizpe, 25900, Ramos Arizpe, Coahuila, México.
Héctor Barrientos-Rodríguez
Affiliation:
3M México S.A. de C.V., Commercial Graphics, México.
*
*Author to whom any correspondence should be addressed (jorge.lopez@cinvestav.edu.mx.)
Get access

Abstract

AISI 316L stainless steel substrates were coated with hydroxyapatite [HAp, Ca10(PO4)6(OH)2]-seeded 58S bioglass, and then their in vitro bioactivity was evaluated by soaking in a simulated body fluid (SBF). The bioglass was prepared via the sol-gel technique and nanometric HAp single crystals were obtained by hydrothermal synthesis. The coatings had bioglass/HAp weight ratios of 100/0, 90/10 or 80/20. The in vitro bioactivity tests were carried out under static conditions at 37 °C and pH = 7.25, for time periods ranging from 1 to 21 days. The results showed that the HAp-seeding significantly accelerates the formation of a HAp layer at the bioglass-coated steel surface during the bioactivity tests.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Walter, M.J., Adv. Mater. Processes 164, 84 (2006).Google Scholar
Hench, L.L., Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull. 74, 1487 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ratner, B.D., J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 27, 837 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kokubo, T., Acta Mater. 46, 2519 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hench, L.L. and Andersson, O., in Advanced Series in Ceramics, Volume 1, An Introduction to Bioceramics , edited by Hench, L.L. and Wilson, J. (World Scientific Publishing, Singapur, 1993), p. 239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hench, L.L. and Andersson, O., in Advanced Series in Ceramics, Volume 1, An Introduction to Bioceramics , edited by Hench, L.L. and Wilson, J. (World Scientific Publishing, Singapur, 1993), p. 41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ducheyne, P., J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 19, 273 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peltola, T., Jokinen, M., Rahiala, H., Levänen, E., Rosenholm, J.B., Kangasniemi, I. and Yli-Urpo, A., J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 44, 12 (1999).3.0.CO;2-E>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Somiya, S., Ioku, K. and Yoshimura, M., Mater. Sci. Forum 34-36, 371 (1998).Google Scholar
Krajewski, A., Ravaglioli, A., De Portu, G. and Visani, R., Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull. 64, 679 (1985).Google Scholar
Rámila, A. and Vallet-Regí, M., Biomaterials 22, 2301 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ASTM E384-84, (American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA, 1989).Google Scholar
ASTM F1147-00 (American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA, 2001).Google Scholar
Ishizawa, H. and Ogino, M., J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 29, 1071 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeGeros, R.Z. and LeGeros, J.P., in An introduction to Bioceramics, edited by Hench, L.L. and Wilson, J. (World Scientific Press, New York, 1998), p. 139.Google Scholar