Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-29T14:43:04.020Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An In Situ Transmission Electron Microscopy Study of Localized Corrosion on Aluminum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2016

Ainsley Pinkowitz*
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY 12180, U.S.A.
See Wee Chee
Affiliation:
Center for BioImaging Sciences, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119077
Brent J. Engler
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY 12180, U.S.A.
David J. Duquette
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY 12180, U.S.A.
Robert Hull
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY 12180, U.S.A.
*
*(Email: pinkoa@rpi.edu)
Get access

Abstract

While the growth of pits in passive metals exposed to chloride solutions is well understood, the processes associated with the initiation and propagation of stable pits, versus pits that form and apparently re-passivate, are still a matter of conjecture. A major challenge in studying pit initiation using electron microscopy has been alteration of the structure and chemistry of the hydrated corrosion films upon transfer to the vacuum environment of the microscope. A recently developed technique uses a microfluidic liquid cell to maintain the aqueous environment in contact with the sample. This work uses such cells to directly observe pits initiating, and growing before reaching stability, in aluminum thin films under potentiostatic polarization in situ in the electron microscope. Polarization curves developed in the cell show good agreement with those observed under conventional electrochemical experimental conditions. We observed current transients representative of metastable pitting and were able to relate crystalline features found in situ with topographic features using atomic force microscopy (AFM). An accumulation of aluminum surrounding an initiated pit, combined with depth profiling using Auger electron spectroscopy suggests that aluminum metal is deposited during the pit initiation process, and may serve to reduce lateral dissolution of the aluminum film. Work is currently underway to determine if this observation is unique to the geometry of the microfluidics cell or if is a general result that occurs at the very beginning of pit initiation.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Zhang, X., Li, S., Liang, R., and Akid, R. presented at 13th International Conference on Fracture, Beijing, 2013.Google Scholar
Revie, R. W. and Uhlig, H. H., Corrosion and Corrosion Control, 4th ed. (Wiley-Interscience, Hoboken, 2008), p. 386 Google Scholar
McCafferty, E.. Cor. Sci. 45, 1421 (2003).Google Scholar
Bersins, A., Lowson, R. T. and Mirams, K. J.. Aust. J. Chem. 30, 1891 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Natishan, P. M. and O’Grady, W. E.. J. Electrochem. Soc. 161, C421 (2014).Google Scholar
Chee, S. W., Duquette, D. J., Ross, F. M., and Hull, R.. Microsc. Microanal. 20, 462 (2014).Google Scholar
Frankel, G. S.. J. Electrochem. Soc. 145,2186 (1998).Google Scholar
Chen, X., Li, C., and Cao, H.. Nanoscale, 7, 4811 (2015).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Unocic, R. R., et al. Chem. Commun. 51, 16377 (2015).Google Scholar
Zeng, Z., et al. Nano Lett. 15, 5214 (2015).Google Scholar
Chee, S. W., et al. Chem. Commun. 51, 168 (2015).Google Scholar
Ross, F. M.. Science. 350, aaa9886–1 (2015).Google Scholar
Schneider, N. M., et al. J. Phys. Chem. C, 118, 22373 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gupta, R.K., et al. Electrochim. Acta, 66, 245 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankel, G. S. and Sridhar, N.. Mater. Today, 11, 38 (2008).Google Scholar
Bockris, J. O’M. and Minevski, Lj. V.. J. Electroanal. Chem. 349, 375 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankel, G. S.. J. Electrochem. Soc. 145, 2186 (1998).Google Scholar
Pistorius, P. C. and Burstein, G. T.. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A, 341, 531 (1992).Google Scholar