Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-7drxs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T09:30:46.580Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Chief Merchants and the European Enclaves of Seventeenth-Century Coromandel

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Joseph J. Brennig
Joseph J. Brennig
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

European enclaves were a characteristic feature of the sixteenth and seventeenth-century European presence in Asia, serving as centers of trade and European society far beyond the frontiers of metropolitan Europe. Yet to consider them as phenomena belonging only to the history of European Asia would be a mistake. Despite the protection of fortifications and control of the sea, the enclaves could never be completely isolated from their hinterlands, for not only did they receive their trade goods from the interior, but the changing local political stituation frequently threatened their survival. Moreover, the enclaves themselves had their definite non-European character, a population of local merchants, artisans and laborers which outnumbered the Europeans. These resident Asians provided goods, services and often capital for European trade; they were, as Holden Furber has observed, partners in European enterprise.

Type
Articles
Information
Modern Asian Studies , Volume 11 , Issue 3 , July 1977 , pp. 321 - 340
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Furber, Holden, ‘Asia and the West as Partners Before “Empire” and After’, Journal of Asian Studies, XXVIII, 4 (08, 1969), pp. 711–21.Google Scholar See also Pearson, Michael N., ‘Indigenous Dominance in a Colonial Economy: The Goa Rendas, 1600–1670’, Mare Luso Indicum, 2 vols (Geneva, 1971), II, 61–73.Google Scholar

2 Stein, Burton, ‘Integration of the Agrarian System of South India’, in Frykenberg, Robert E. (ed.), Land Control and Social Structure in Indian History (Madison, 1969), p. 194.Google Scholar

3 The date and place of this first meeting can be deduced from a Dutch remark made in 1634 that they had known Malaya for twenty-six years, or since 1608. Daghregister gehouden int Casteel Batavia…, 27 vols (Batavia, 1887–1931), 1631–34, 14 August, 1634, pp. 364–5. And it was in 1608 that the Dutch landed at Tegenepatnam, a port with which Malaya and his family maintained close connections in later years.Google Scholar

4 Malaya's identification as a Balija rests on two pieces of evidence. First, and most important, are two letters written by the Agent of the Council of Fort St George in 1653 which, when read together, suggest that Malaya's brother, Sesadra, headed the Balija community of Madras. See Love, H. D., Vestiges of Old Madras, 1640–1800, 4 vols (London, 1913), I, 120–1.Google Scholar Second is a list of merchants trading with the Dutch factory at Tegenepatnam in 1680. Included on this list is one Krishnappa Naik, described as the son of Konara Chitti of the Balija (Balrozjawaar) caste, who was born in Jinji and presently resided in the port of Nagapatnam in the Tanjore, country. K.A. (Koloniaal Archief) 1249, 2 February, 1680, fol. 1527. The Konara Chitti mentioned in this document was probably the nephew of Malaya, for this nephew lived in Jinji in the 1640s and later settled at Nagapatnam. It was clearly possible for Malaya's nephew to have had a son who fits the description of Krishnappa Naik. The English identification of Malaya as a ‘great commitie [Komati]’ in 1624 was probably the result of their extensive contact with the Komati merchants of northern Coromandel and their ignorance at this early date of the existence of other major Telugu merchant castes. See Foster, William (ed.), The English Factories in India, 1624–1629 (Oxford, 1909), 27 March, 1624, p. 9 [hereafter cited as E.F.I.].Google Scholar For the aristocratic claims of the Balijas see Thurston, Edgar, Castes and Tribes of Southern India, 9 vols (London, 1913), I, 134–5.Google Scholar

5 E.F.I., 1624–1629, 27 April, 1624–1620 November, 1624, p. 16.Google Scholar

6 K.A. 1021, 5 August, 1632, fols 246–7.Google Scholar

7 Generale Missiven van de Gouverneurs General en Raden ann de Heeren XVII der Vereenigde Oost-indiche Compagine, Vol. 1, 1610–1638, ed. Coolhaas, W. Ph. (The Hague, 1960), 15 August, 1633, p. 379.Google Scholar

8 Moreland, W. H. (ed.), Relations of Golconda in the Early Seventeenth Century (London, 1931), p. 46.Google Scholar

9 Daghregister, 1631–1634, 31 January, 1634, p. 231; 20 August, 1634, p. 365.Google Scholar

10 Mir Jumla (more precisely Mir Muhammad Said Astarabadi, Mir Jumla) constructed a ship of 800 tons capacity at Narasapur, a port and shipbuilding center on the Godaveri River in northern Coromandel, in 1638. E.F.I., 1637–1641, 26 June, 1638, p. 80.Google Scholar By 1651, Mir Jumla had ten ships and traded throughout the Indian Ocean region. E.F.I., 1651–1654, 17 January, 1651, p. 12.Google Scholar

11 Sastri, K. A. Nilakanta and Venkataramanayya, N., Further Sources of Vijayanagara History, 3 vols (Madras, 1946), I, 339;Google ScholarDaghregister, 1631–1634, 14 August, 1634, p. 364.Google Scholar

12 MacLeod, N., De Oost-Indiche Compagnie als Zeemogendheid in Azie, 3 vols (Rijswijk, 1927), II, 170.Google Scholar

13 Ibid., II, 13.

14 Raychaudhuri, Tapan, Jan Company in Coromandel, 1605–1690: A Study in the Interrelations of European Commerce and Traditional Economies. Verhandelingen van het Koninklijk Instituut voor Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde, Deel 38 (The Hague, 1962), p. 51.Google Scholar

15 MacLeod, , De Oost-Indische Compagnie, II, 181–2.Google Scholar

16 Generale Missiven, 22 December, 1638, p. 719.Google Scholar

17 Sastri, , Vijayanagara History, I, 348;Google ScholarE.F.I., 1642–1645, 4 January, 1643, p. 81, n. 1.Google Scholar

18 E.F.I., 1642–1654, 28 January, 1644, p. 154; and 154, n. 1.Google Scholar

19 Ibid., 8 September, 1645, pp. 279–80.

20 Sastri, , Vijayanagara History, I, 352.Google Scholar

21 Withdrawal was not the only option available to the active participants in Nayaka politics. Krishnappa Naik, for example, displayed even greater flexibility than Chinnana. Shortly after his successful attack on Tegenepatnam, Krishnappa Naik took effective control over Jinji, acting as regent on behalf of the still minor Nayaka. He paid special attention to overseas trade. Between 1640 and 1644 he issued Kauls (letter of authority) to the Dutch in Tegenepatnam without reference to the Nayaka's authority, but in 1644 the Nayaka gained his throne and forced Krishnappa to leave Jinji. Sri Ranga then employed Krishnappa to lead an army against the advancing Mir Jumla. But in 1647, apparently realizing the futility of Sri Ranga's cause, Krishnappa joined Mir Jumla and in time became Mir Jumla's most trusted aide. When in 1655 Mir Jumla left South India, he placed Krishnappa in charge as his representative. Krishnappa's varied career ended in 1659 when Neknam Khan, a Golconda general, captured and executed him in the course of Golconda's reconquest of the south. See MacLeod, , De Oost-Indische Compagnie, II, 404;Google ScholarRaychaudhuri, , Jan Company in Coromandel, pp. 44, 53–4;Google ScholarHeeres, H. (ed.), Corpus Diplomaticum Neerlando-Indicum, 3 vols (The Hague, 1907–1934), I, 39ff, 417ff, 424ff;Google ScholarGenerale Missiven, II, 16 12, 1659, p. 262.Google Scholar

22 Raychaudhuri's statement (Jan Company in Coromandel, p. 54) that Chinnana, following Udayagiri, was forced to seek Dutch favor is contradicted by an English letter which states that Chinnana returned to Pulicat after much solicitation by the Dutch. E.F.I., 1646–1650, 9 October, 1647, p. 165.Google Scholar

23 E.F.I., 1637–1641, September–December, 1641, p. 316;Google ScholarE.F.I., 1642–1645, 4 January, 1643, p. 81.Google Scholar

24 Kanappa had held the position of adigar or headman of ‘Black Town’, the indigenous community surrounding Fort St George. E.F.I., 1651–1654, p. 236.Google Scholar

25 See Beck, Brenda, ‘The Right–Left Division of South Indian Society’, Journal of Asian Studies, XXIX, 4 (08, 1970);Google ScholarAppadurai, Arjun, ‘Right and Left Castes in South India’, Indian Economic and Social History Review, XI, 2 and 3 (06–09, 1974), pp. 216–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

26 This is the view taken by Appadurai in Ibid.

27 Love, , Vestiges of Old Madras, I, 119.Google Scholar

28 Ibid., 120. Sesadra's neutral position may reflect the neutrality customarily affected by the king in South India in these disputes. See Dubois, Abbé J. A., Hindu Manners, Customs and Ceremonies, trans. and ed. Beauchamp, H. K., 3rd ed. (Oxford, 1959), p. 25.Google Scholar

29 Love, , Vestiges of Old Madras, I, 121.Google Scholar

30 Ibid., 122; E.F.I., 1651–1654, p. 240.

31 Love, , Vestiges of Old Madras, I, 129.Google Scholar

32 E.F.I., 1651–1654, 18 September, 1654, p. 293.Google Scholar

33 E.F.I., 1655–1660, 28 January, 1657, pp. 97ff.Google Scholar

34 Generale Missiven, II, 17 December, 1657, p. 164.

35 Ibid., III, 16 December, 1659, p. 261.

36 Arasaratnam, S., ‘Aspects of the Role and Activities of South Indian Merchants c. 1650–1750’, Proceedings of the First International Conference-Seminar of Tamil Studies, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, April, 1966, Vol. I (Kuala Lumpur, 1968), pp. 588–9.Google Scholar

37 E.F.I., 1661–1664, 4 August, 1662, pp. 165–6.Google Scholar

38 According to a hostile account, Timanna remained a ‘pittiful one or two pagoda per mensem servant’ until just before his appointment as Chief Merchant. Ibid., 10 January, 1664, p. 389.

39 Timanna's caste is identified in Naidoo, Bundla Ramasawmy, Memoir on the Internal Revenue System of the Madras Presidency. Selections from the Records of the South Arcot District. No. 11 (Madras, 1908), p. 73.Google Scholar Bundla Ramasawmy Naidu claims direct descent from Timanna. For the Perike caste see Thurston, , Castes and Tribes of Southern India, V, 191ff.Google Scholar

40 E.F.I., 1651–1654, pp. 259, 260, 262.Google Scholar

41 E.F.I., 1661–1664 [1664], p. 388.Google Scholar

42 English East India Company, Records of Fort St. George. Diary and Consultation Book, 1672–1678 (Madras, 1910), 20 October 1674, p. 32 [hereafter cited as R.F.S.G.];Google Scholar and Naidoo, , Memoir on Internal Revenue System, p. 72.Google Scholar

43 Martin, François, Mémoires de François Martin, Fondateur de Pondichery, ed. Martineau, A., 3 vols (Paris, 1932), II, 189.Google Scholar In 1662 Viranna joined Timanna in a contract, signing as ‘Hasan Cawn [Hasan Khan]’. E.F.I., 1661–1664, 4 August, 1662, p. 166, n. 1.Google Scholar

44 Carré, Abbé, The Travels of Abbé Carré in India and the Near East, 1672–1674, ed. and trans. Fawcett, Lady and SirFawcett, Charles, 2 vols (London, 1947), II, 605; and 605, n. 1.Google Scholar

45 R.F.S.G., Letters to Fort St. George, [Letter received 27 July, 1681], p. 6.Google Scholar

46 Ibid., Diary and Consultation Book, 1679–1680, 31 August, 1679, p. 53; 16 January, 1680, p. 193; and Letters from Fort St. George, 1679, 8 September, 1679, p. 42.Google Scholar

47 Ibid., Diary and Consultation Book, 1672–1678, 28 September, 1675, p. 74.

48 Love, , Vestiges of Old Madras, I, 385–6.Google Scholar

49 R.F.S.G., Diary and Consultation Book, 1680, 16 September, 1680, pp. 66–7.Google Scholar

50 Ibid., Diary and Consultation Book, 1680–1681, 5 July, 1680, p. 45.

51 E.F.I., 1678–1684, p. 12. Master sold Vencatadry's trade goods for 41,000 pagodas and his jewelry for 8,000 pagodas.Google Scholar

52 R.F.S.G., Diary and Consultation Book, 1681, 24 February, 1681, p. 7.Google Scholar