Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-19T17:32:44.086Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sintering and crystal growth of magnesia in the presence of lime and forsterite

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

D. R. F. Spencer
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Technology, University of Technology, Loughborough, Leicestershire
D. S. Coleman
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Technology, University of Technology, Loughborough, Leicestershire

Summary

The densification of pure magnesia was examined along with mixtures containing 0·5 and 1·0 mol % of calcium oxide and forsterite. The sintering behaviour at temperatures between 1400 and 1800 °C was studied and measurements made of changes in shrinkage, porosity, bulk density, and grain size for sintering times of up to 8 h at sintering temperature. It was found that both the 0·5 and 1·0 mol % additions enhanced the sintering of pure magnesia in the temperature range 1500–1700 °C Increased grain growth was found for mixtures containing forsterite but little change occurred for mixtures containing lime. Examination of the grain growth data showed that the mixtures obeyed a relationship: Time at temperature × Constant = (grain size)n, where n = 2 for the grain growth of pure magnesia and mixtures containing lime, but n = 3 for mixtures of magnesia with additions of a silicate such as forsterite. A value of 78 kcal/mole was obtained for the grain growth of pure magnesia, which agrees with other researches.

The extent of the solubility of lime in periclase for each lime-magnesia mixture at each temperature was also examined using electron probe analysis and related to the sintering behaviour observed for these mixtures.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Levin, (E. M.) et al., 1964. Phase Diagrams for Ceramists, Amer. Ceram. Soc., Columbus, Ohio.Google Scholar
Spencer, (D. R. F.) and Coleman, (D. S.), 1969a. Trans. Brit. Ceram. Soc. 68 (3), 125.Google Scholar
Spencer, (D. R. F.) and Coleman, (D. S.), 1969b. Science of Ceramics, 5th edn, 23 April, Ronneby Brunn (Sweden).Google Scholar
Fullman, (R. L.), 1953. Trans. A.I.M.E. 197, 81.Google Scholar
Turnbull, (D.), 1965. J. Metals, 3, Trans. A.I.M.E. 191 (8), 661.Google Scholar
Burke, (J. E.), 1957. J. Amer. Ceram. Soc. 40 (3), 80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, (C. S.). 1948, Grains, phases and interfaces: an interpretation of microstructure, Metals Technol. 15, (4), Trans. A.I.M.M.E. 175, 15.Google Scholar
Spriggs, (R. M.), Brissette, (L. A.), and Vasilos, (T.), J. Amer. Ceram. Soc. 46 (10), 508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daniels, (A. U.), Lowrie, (R. C.), Gibby, (R. L.), and Cutler, (L B.), 1962. Ibid. 45 (6), 282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingery, (W. O.) and Francois, (B.), 1965. Ibid. 48 (10), 546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henney, (J. W.) and Jones, (J. W. S.), 1969. Trans. Brit. Ceram. Soc. 68 (4), 201.Google Scholar
Wells, (A.), 1962. Structural Inorganic Chemistry, 3rd edn, Clarendon Press (Oxford).Google Scholar
Mead, (G. F.), 1969. Unpublished research, dissertation, Department of Materials Technology, University of Technology, Loughborough.Google Scholar
Spencer, (D. R. F.), Beamond, (T. W.), and Coleman, (D. S.) 1970, Trans. Brit. Ceram. Soc. (in press).Google Scholar
Degtyareva, (E. V.), Kainarskii, (I. S.), and Prokopenko, (M. I.), 1967. Ogneupory, (3), 41.Google Scholar