Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T04:36:12.630Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reactions between uranium veins and their host rocks in Vendée and Limousin (France)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

M. Cathelineau  and
J. Leroy
M. Cathelineau
Affiliation:
Centre de Recherches sur la Géologe de l'Uranium, BP 23, 54500 Vandoeuvre, France
J. Leroy
Affiliation:
Ecole Nationale Supérieure de Géologie Appliquée et de Prospection Minière, BP 452, 54001 Nancy Cedex, France
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Hydrothermal uranium veins, associated with the Hercynian leucogranites show important variations in their mineralogical, chemical and structural features in relation to the host rock lithology. These are described with particular reference to the Chardon deposit, Vendée where the veins cut granite, basic lithologies, and shales. The following features are described:

  1. 1 Changes in the thickness of veins near to contact zones, particularly those between granites and basic lithologies, lamprophyres, and shales.

  2. 2 Changes in the gangue mineral assemblage with the preferential development of carbonate in veins cutting basic lithologies, and of silica in veins which cut granite.

  3. 3 Paragenetic zoning in the veins in passing from granites to their metamorphic aureoles.

Comparisons between deposits of Vendée, Limousin, and Erzgebirge allow the following generalizations to be made:

  1. 1 Open faults and subsequent mineralization are concentrated at boundaries between competent and more plastic lithologies.

  2. 2 Mineralizing fluids cause wall-rock alteration characterized by the removal of Si from granite and of Ca, Mg, Fe from metamorphic and basic rocks.

  3. 3 The chemical and structural characteristics of wallrocks are important controls on the mineralization but in acid lithologies the main controls on the pitchblende vein formation are the structural characteristics of the wallrock.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical Magazine , Volume 44 , Issue 336 , December 1981 , pp. 417 - 423
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cathelineau, M. (1979). Bull. BRGM I1, 4, 4-300.Google Scholar
Cathelineau, M. (1981a). Mineral. Deposita, 16, 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cathelineau, M. (1981b). Thesis, INPL.Google Scholar
Cathelineau, M. (1981c). The importance of K-montmorillonite and potassic clay paragenesis in hydrothermal alteration. 7th Int. Clay Conf., Bologna and Pavia (abs.).Google Scholar
Cathelineau, M., Cuney, M., Leroy, J., Lhote, F., Nguyen Trung, C., Pagel, M., and Poty, B. (1980). Syrup. Lisbonne “The geology of vein and similar type uranium deposits', Proc. of IAEA (to be published).Google Scholar
Cuney, M. (1974). Thesis. Univ. Nancy I, 174 pp.Google Scholar
Everhart, D. L. (1956). In Acres de la conf. Intern. sur l'utilisation de l'energie atomique a des fins pacifiques, vol. VI, 297–304.Google Scholar
Geffroy, J. and Sarcia, J. A. (1960). In “Les minerals uraniféres franqais’ PUF édit. Paris I, 1-86.Google Scholar
Kosztolanyi, Ch. (1971). Thesis. Univ. Nancy I, 279 pp.Google Scholar
Leroy, J. (1978a). Métallogenrse des gisements d'uranium de al division de la Crouzille (Cogema, Nord Limousin, France). Sci. de la Terre, Mém. Fr. 36, 276 pp.Google Scholar
Leroy, J. (1978b). Econ. Geol. 73, 73-34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leroy, J. and Cathelineau, M. (1981). Bull. Mineral. (in press).Google Scholar
Lillié, F. (1974). Thesis, Univ. Strasbourg.Google Scholar
Mullis, J. (1976). Schweiz. mineral, petrogr. Mitt. 56, 56-68.Google Scholar
Naumov, G. B. and Mironova, L. F. (1969). Z. angew. Geol. Dtsch. 15, 15-1.Google Scholar
Sarcia, J. and Sarcia, J. A. (1962). In ‘Les minerals uraniféres français', PUF édit., Paris, II, pp. 185-292.Google Scholar
Sokolova, N. T. and Acheyev, B. N. (1972). Geochem. Int. 9, 9-77.Google Scholar
Tugarinov, A. I. and Naumov, G. B. (1969). Ibid. 2, 2-103.Google Scholar
Tugarinov, A. I. and Naumov, G. B. (1972). In “Recent contributions to geochemistry and analytical chemistry'. Tugarinov, A. I. ed. 293-302.Google Scholar