Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-s9k8s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-11T17:56:31.387Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The crystal structure of stilpnomelane. Part II. The full cell

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

R. A. Eggleton
R. A. Eggleton*
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Australian National University, Canberra, A.C.T., Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The structural formula of stilpnomelane averaged from 37 representative literature analyses and based on the determined structure is (Ca,Na,K)4(Ti0·1Al2·3Fe35·5Mn0·8Mg9·3)[Si63Al9](O,OH)216·nH2O. Ferrostilpnomelanes have up to 12 R3+ cations in the octahedral sheet, ferristilpnomelanes commonly have between 24 and 30 R3+ cations, rarely up to 37. The two groups can be distinguished by accurate X-ray powder diffraction, ferrostilpnomelanes having d001 less and a greater than have ferristilpnomelanes. The unit cell is triclinic, a = b∼21·8 Å, γ = 120°, d001∼12·2 Å, P. Hexagonal groups or ‘islands’ of 24 silicon-oxygen tetrahedra co-ordinate to the octahedral sheet, the centres of the ‘islands’ are displaced by 5a/12, 8b/12 on either side of the octahedral sheet as a result of warping of this sheet to permit articulation with the smaller tetrahedral sheet. The 24-tetrahedra ‘islands’ are linked laterally by 6-member rings of inverted tetrahedra, which in turn link at their apices to like rings connecting the next sheet of ‘islands’. Thus a single tetrahedral layer is 4 tetrahedra thick and has symmetry 6/m. The 6-member rings of tetrahedra act as hinges permitting up to 0·5 Å extension or contraction of the tetrahedral sheet to accommodate variations in the octahedral sheet dimensions with varying R2+/R3+ ratio.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical Magazine , Volume 38 , Issue 298 , June 1972 , pp. 693 - 711
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agrell, (S.O.), Bown, (M.G.), and McKIE, (D.), 1965. Deerite, howieite, and zussmanite, three new minerals from the Franciscan of the Laytonville District, Mendocino Co., California. Min. Mag. 35, liv; Amer. Min. 50, 278.Google Scholar
Blake, (R.L.), 1965. Iron phyllosilicates of the Cuyuna district in Minnesota. Amer. Min. 50, 148 [M.A. 17-299 ].Google Scholar
Brown, (E.H.), 1967. The Greenschist Facies in Part of Eastern Otago, New Zealand. Contr. Min. Petr. 14, 259.Google Scholar
Eggleton, (R.A.), 1969. Phase determination for pseudo-symmetric centro-symmetric crystals. Acta Cryst. A25, 543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eggleton, (R.A.), 1970. Silicon tetrahedral sheet in stilpnomelane. Nature, 225, 625.Google Scholar
Eggleton, (R.A.), and Bailey, (S.W.), 1965. The crystal structure of stilpnomelane. Part I. The Subcell. Clays Clay Min. 13, 49 [M.A. 17-732].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruner, (J.W.), 1937. Composition and structure of stilpnomelane. Amer. Min. 22, 912 [M.A. 7-93].Google Scholar
Häberle, (H.), 1969. Die Stilpnomelan-Mineralien und ihr Vorkommen in Osterreich. Tschermaks Min. Petr. Mitt. 3rd ser., 13, 85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hashimoto, (M.), 1969. A note on stilpnomelane mineralogy. Contr. Min. Petr. 23, 86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howells, (E.R.), PamLivs (D. C.), and Rogers, (D.), 1950. The probability distribution of X-ray intensities, II, Experimental investigation and the X-ray detection of centers of symmetry. Aeta Cryst. 3, 210.Google Scholar
Hutton, (C.O.), 1938. The stilpnomelane group of minerals. Min. Mag. 25, 172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katada, (M.) and Sumi, (K.), 1966. Stilpnomelane co-existing with biotite in a Ry6ke metamorphic rock. Jour. Geol. Soc. Japan, 72, 517.[M.A. 19-237].Google Scholar
Kräutner, (H. G.) and MedeŞAN, (A.), 1969. On stilpnomelane in some Romanian Carpathian Crystalline Formations. Tschermaks Min. Petr. Mitt. 3rd set. 13, 203.Google Scholar
Kunze, (G.), 1956. Die gewellte Struktur des Antigorits, I. Zeits. Krist. 108, 82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laberge, (G.L.), 1966. Eccon. Geol. 61, 147 and 572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lopes-VIEIRA, (A.) and Zussman, (J.), 1969. Further detail on the crystal structure of zussmanite. Mitt. Mag. 37, 49-Google Scholar
Roast, (F.) and Stettner, (G.), 1969. Über Stilpnomelan in der Grünschieferzone der Mi.inchberger Gneismasse. Contr. Min. Petr. 24, 66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, (M.L.) and Frondel, (C.), 1968. The related layered minerals ganophyllite, bannisterite, and stilpnomelane. Min. Mag. 36, 893 [M.A. 19-314].Google Scholar
Taylor, (C.A.) and Lipson, (H.), 1964. Optical Transforms. G. Bell and Sons Ltd., London.Google Scholar
Zen, (E-AN), 1960. Metamorphism of the Lower Paleozoic rocks in the vicinity of the Taconic Range in West-Central Vermont. Amer. Min. 45, 129.Google Scholar