Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-v5vhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-30T02:41:57.156Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The conversion of smectite to illite during diagenesis: evidence from some illitic clays from bentonites and sandstones

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

P. H. Nadeau ,
M. J. Wilson ,
W. J. McHardy  and
J. M. Tait
P. H. Nadeau
Affiliation:
The Macaulay Institute for Soil Research, Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen AB9 2QJ, Scotland
M. J. Wilson
Affiliation:
The Macaulay Institute for Soil Research, Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen AB9 2QJ, Scotland
W. J. McHardy
Affiliation:
The Macaulay Institute for Soil Research, Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen AB9 2QJ, Scotland
J. M. Tait
Affiliation:
The Macaulay Institute for Soil Research, Craigiebuckler, Aberdeen AB9 2QJ, Scotland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Diagenetic illitic clays from seven North American bentonites of Ordovician, Devonian, and Cretaceous ages and from three subsurface North Sea sandstones of Permian and Jurassic ages have been examined by X-ray diffraction (XRD) and transmission and scanning electron microscopy (TEM and SEM). XRD indicates that the clays from the bentonites are randomly and regularly interstratified illite/smectites (I/S) with 30–90% illite layers, whereas the clays from the Jurassic and Permian sandstones are regularly interstratified I/S, with 80–90% illite layers, and illite respectively. TEM of shadowed materials shows that randomly interstratified I/S consists primarily of mixtures of elementary smectite and ‘illite’ particles (10 and 20Å thick respectively) and that regularly interstratified I/S and illite consist mainly of ‘illite’ particles 20–50 Å thick and > 50 Å thick respectively. Regularly interstratified I/S from bentonites and sandstones are similar with regard to XRD character and particle thickness distribution. These observations can be rationalized if the interstratified XRD character arises from an interparticle diffraction effect, where the smectite interlayers perceived by XRD, result from adsorption of exchangeable cations and water or organic molecules at the interfaces of particles generally < 50Å thick. A neoformation mechanism is proposed by which smectite is converted to illite with increasing depth of burial in sedimentary rocks, based on dissolution of smectite particles and the precipitation/growth of ‘illite’ particles occurring within a population of thin phyllosilicate crystals.

Keywords

smectiteillitediagenesisclaysbentonitesandstone
Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical Magazine , Volume 49 , Issue 352 , June 1985 , pp. 393 - 400
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brown, G. (1984) In: Clay Minerals: Their Structure, Behaviour and Use, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 311 (Fowden, L., Barrer, R. M., and Tinker, P. B., eds.), 221-40.Google Scholar
Eslinger, E., and Sellars, B. (1981) J. Sedim. Petrol. 51, 203-16.Google Scholar
Gray, D. H., and Rex, R. W. (1966) Clays Clay Minerals, 14, 355-66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Güven, N., Hower, W. F., and Davies, D. K. (1980) J. Sedim. Petrol. 50, 761-6.Google Scholar
Hoffman, J., and Hower, J. (1979) In: Aspects ofDiagenesis SEPM Spec. Publ. 26 (Scholle, P. A. and Schluger, P. R., eds.), 55-79.Google Scholar
Hower, J., and Mowatt, T. C. (1966) Am. Mineral. 51, 825-54.Google Scholar
Hower, J., Eslinger, E. V., Hower, M. E., and Perry, E. A. (1976) Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 87, 725-37.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McHardy, W. J., Wilson, M. J., and Tait, J. M. (1982) Clay Minerals, 17, 23–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadeau, P. H. (1980) Ph.D. thesis, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA.Google Scholar
Nadeau, P. H. and Reynolds, R. C. (1981a) Nature, 294, 72-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadeau, P. H. and Reynolds, R. C. (1981b) Clays Clay Minerals, 29, 249-59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadeau, P. H., Tait, J. M., McHardy, W. J., and Wilson, M. J. (1984a) Clay Minerals, 19, 67–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadeau, P. H., Wilson, M. J., McHardy, W. J., and Tait, J. M. (1984b) Clay Minerals, 19, 757-69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pallatt, N., Wilson, M. J., and McHardy, W. J. (1984) J. Petroleum Technology, 36, 2225-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, E. A., and Hower, J. (1970) Clays Clay Minerals, 18, 165-77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, R. C. (1980) Pp. 249–303. In: Crystal Structures of Clay Minerals and their X-ray Identification (Brindley, G. W. and Brown, G., eds.). Mineralogical Society, London.Google Scholar
Reynolds, R. C. and Hower, J. (1970) Clays Clay Minerals, 18, 25–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultz, L. G. (1978) U.S. Geol. surv. Prof. Pap. 1064-A, 28 pp.Google Scholar
Środón, J., and Ebenl, D. D. (1984) In Micas (Bailey, S. W., ed.). Mineral. Soc. Am. 495-544.Google Scholar
Stalder, P. J. (1973) Geologie Mijnb. 52, 217-20.Google Scholar
Velde, B., and Weir, A. H. (1979) Pp. 395–404. In: Proc. lnt. Clay Conf., Oxford, 1978 (Mortland, M. M. and Farmer, V. C., eds.). Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Welden, C. M. (1966) M.Sc. thesis, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.Google Scholar
Wilson, M. D., and Pittman, E. D. (1977) J. Sedim. Petrol. 47, 3-31.Google Scholar