Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-26T03:29:37.490Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chemical variation in a partially dolomitized Visean limestone bed, Isle of Man

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

J. A. D. Dickson
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Nottingham, England
C. Barber
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Nottingham, England

Summary

The analysis of an acid-soluble and acid-insoluble fraction of one systematically sampled, partially dolomitized limestone bed is reported. The original lime sediment, composed principally of skeletal remains, pellets, occasional intraclasts, detrital quartz, illite, and muscovite has been modified by the addition of calcite, dolomite, and dickite cements and has been patchily replaced by dolomite, quartz, and pyrite. Rapid chemical and mineralogical variations occur over short distances, i.e. within 10 m. Fe and Mn are both present in greater concentration in dolomite than in calcite. Dolomite itself varies in overall composition within the limestones and dolostones but is always Sr-deficient. The insoluble residue is dominated by quartz. Authigenic quartz occurs but its distribution is controlled by pre-existing detrital quartz so SiO2 distribution corresponds to a detrital arrangement. TiO2 and K2O follow the distribution of SiO2 and are believed to be sited in detrital minerals, muscovite, and other unidentified minerals. Sulphur, present in pyrite, has a patchy distribution but is deficient in totally dolomitized areas suggesting removal of pyrite during dolomitization.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barber, (C), 1975. Chem. Geol. 14, 273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bathurst, (R. G. C), 1966. Geol. J. 5, 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behrens, (E. W.) and Land, (L. S.), 1972. J. Sed. Petrol. 42, 155.Google Scholar
Dickson, (J. A. D.), 1967. The structure and sedimentation of the Carboniferous rocks of the Castletown area. Isle of Man. Ph.D. thesis, University of London.Google Scholar
Dickson, (J. A. D.) and Barber, (C), 1976. Sedimentology, 23, 189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunham, (R. J.), 1962. In Ham, (W. E.), Am. Ass. Pet. Geol. Mem., 1, 108.Google Scholar
Folk, (R. L.), 1959. Am. Ass. Pet. Geol. Bull. 43, 1.Google Scholar
Folk, (R. L.) and Land, (L. S.), 1975. Am. Ass. Pet. Geol. Bull. 59, 60.Google Scholar
Gavish, (E.) and Friedman, (G. M.), 1973. Sedimentology, 20, 437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graf, (D. L.), 1961. Am. Mineral. 46, 1283.Google Scholar
Al-Hashimi, (W. S.) and Hemingway, (J. E.), 1973. J. Sed. Petrol. 44, 271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, (A.), 1971. J. Geol. 79, 38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Land, (L. S.), Salem, (M. R. I.), and Morrow, (D. W.), 1975. Am. Ass. Pet. Geol. Bull. 59, 1602.Google Scholar
Lewis, (H. P.), 1930. Q.J. Geol. Soc. 86, 234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lumsden, (D. N.), 1974. J. Sed. Petrol. 44, 450.Google Scholar
Milliman, (J. D.) and Bornhold, (B. D.), 1973. Sedimentology, 20, 445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Runnells, (D. D.), 1974. J. Sed. Petrol. 44, 270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tennant, (C. B.) and Berger, (R. W.), 1957. Am. Mineral. 42, 23.Google Scholar
Till, (R.), 1971. Am. Ass. Pet. Geol. Bull. 55, 523.Google Scholar
Weber, (J. N.), 1964. Geochim. Cosmochim. Ada, 28, 1817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar