Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T10:19:22.646Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Alpha particle damage in biotite characterized by microfocus X-ray diffraction and Fe K-edge X-ray absorption spectroscopy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

R. A. D. Pattrick*
Affiliation:
School of Earth, Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences and the Williamson Research Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
J. M. Charnock
Affiliation:
School of Earth, Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences and the Williamson Research Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
T. Geraki
Affiliation:
Diamond Light Source, Rutherford Appleton Laboratories, Didcott, Oxfordshire OX11 0QX, UK
J. F. W. Mosselmans
Affiliation:
Diamond Light Source, Rutherford Appleton Laboratories, Didcott, Oxfordshire OX11 0QX, UK
C. I. Pearce
Affiliation:
School of Chemistry, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK and Dalton Cumbrian Facility, The University of Manchester, Westlakes Science and Technology Park, Cumbria CA24 3HA, UK
S. Pimblott
Affiliation:
School of Chemistry, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK and Dalton Cumbrian Facility, The University of Manchester, Westlakes Science and Technology Park, Cumbria CA24 3HA, UK
G. T. R. Droop
Affiliation:
School of Earth, Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences and the Williamson Research Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Combined microfocus XAS and XRD analysis of α-particle radiation damage haloes around thorium-containing monazite in Fe-rich biotite reveals changes in both short- and long-range order. The total α-particles flux derived from the Th and U in the monazite over 1.8 Ga was 0.022 α particles per atomic component of the monazite and this caused increasing amounts of structural damage as the monazite emitter is approached. Short-range order disruption revealed by Fe K-edge EXAFS is manifest by a high variability in Fe–Fe bond lengths and a marked decrease in coordination number. XANES examination of the Fe K-edge shows a decrease in energy of the main absorption by up to 1 eV, revealing reduction of the Fe3+ components of the biotite by interaction with the 24He2+, the result of low and thermal energy electrons produced by the cascade of electron collisions. Changes in d spacings in the XRD patterns reveal the development of polycrystallinity and new domains of damaged biotite structure with evidence of displaced atoms due to ionization interactions and nuclear collisions. The damage in biotite is considered to have been facilitated by destruction of OH groups by radiolysis and the development of Frenkel pairs causing an increase in the trioctahedral layer distances and contraction within the trioctahedral layers. The large amount of radiation damage close to the monazite can be explained by examining the electronic stopping flux.

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 2013 This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution license. (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 2013

References

Berry, A.J., Yaxley, G.M., Hanger, B.J., Woodland A.J., de Jonge, M.D., Howard, D.L., Paterson, D. and Kamenetsky, V.S. (2013) Quantitative mapping of the oxidative effects of mantle metasomatism. Geology, doi:10.1130/G34119.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brigatti, M.F. and Guggenheim, S. (2002) Mica crystal chemistry and the influence of pressure, temperature, and solid solution on atomistic models. Pp. 1–97 in: Micas: Crystal Chemistry and Metamorphic Petrology (Mottana, A., Sassi, F.P., Thompson, J.B. Jr. and Guggenheim, S., editors). Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, 46, Mineralogical Society of America and The Geochemical Society, Chantilly, Virginia, USA.Google Scholar
Brigatti, M.F., Guidotti, C.V., Malferrari, D. and Sassi, F.P. (2008) Single-crystal X-ray studies of trioctahedral micas coexisting with dioctahedral micas in metamorphic sequences from western Maine. American Mineralogist, 93, 396408 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cruciani, G. and Zanazzi, P.F. (1994) Cation partitioning and substitution mechanisms in 1M-phlogopite: a crystal chemical study. American Mineralogist, 78, 289301 Google Scholar
Ewing, R.C. (2000) Radiation-induced amorphization. Pp. 319361 in: Transformation Processes in Minerals (S.A.T. Redfern and M.A. Carpenter, editors). Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, 39. Mineralogical Society of America and The Geochemical Society, Chantilly, Virginia, USA.Google Scholar
Ewing, R.C. (2001) The design and evaluation of nuclear waste forms: Clues from mineralogy. The Canadian Mineralogist, 39, 697715 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewing, R.C. (1994) The metamict state: 1993 – The Centennial. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, B91, 2229 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewing, R.C., Meldrum, A., Wang, L., Weber, J. and Corrales, R. (2003) Radiation effects in zircon. Pp. 387426 in: Zircon (J.M. Hanchar and P.W.O. Hoskins, editors). Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, 53. Mineralogical Society of America and The Geochemical Society, Chantilly, Virginia, USA.Google Scholar
Fleet, M.E. (2003) Rock-Forming Minerals, Volume 3A Sheet Silicates: Micas. The Geological Society, London. 758 pp.Google Scholar
Fletcher, D.A., McMeeking, R.F. and Parkin, D. (1996) The United Kingdom Chemical Database Service. Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Science, 36, 746749 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gentry, R.V. (1974) Radiohaloes in a radiochronological and cosmological perspective. Science, 184, 6266 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, N.F.M. (1935) Some data on the iron-rich hypersthenes. Mineralogical Magazine, 24, 221226 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holland, H.D. and Gottfried D. (1955) The effect of nuclear radiation on the structure of zircon. Acta Crystallographica, 8, 291300 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ilavsky, J. (2012) Nika: software for two-dimensional data reduction. Journal of Applied Crystallography, 45, 324328 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joly, J. (1917) The genesis of pleochroic halos. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series A, 217, 51.Google Scholar
Karsten, K. and Ehrhart, P. (1995) Frenkel pairs in lowtemperature electron irradiated InP: X-ray diffraction Physics Review, B51, 1050810519 Google Scholar
Manova, L.J., Connolly, J.A.D. and Cesare, B. (2009) A thermodynamic model for titanium and ferric iron solution in biotite. Journal of Metamorphic Geology, 27, 153165 Google Scholar
Mesto, E., Schingaro, E., Scordari, F. and Ottolini, L. (2006) An electron microprobe analysis, secondary ion mass spectrometry, and single-crystal X-ray diffraction study of phlogopites from Mt. Vulture, Potenza, Italy: Consideration of cation partitioning. American Mineralogist, 91, 182190 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miro, S., Grebille, D., Chateigner, D., Pelloquin, D., Stoquert, J.P., Grob J.-J., Costantini, J.M. and Studer, F. (2004) Changes in X-ray diffraction study of damage induced by swift heavy ion irradiation in fluorapatite. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, B 227, 306318 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mosselmans, J.F.W., Quinn, P.D., Dent, A.J., Cavill, S.A., Diaz Moreno, S., Peach, A., Leicester, P.J., Keylock, S.J., Gregory, S.R., Atkinson, K.D. and Roque Rosell, J. (2009) I18 – the microfocus spectroscopy beamline at the Diamond Light Source. Journal of Synchrotron Radiation, 16, 818824 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Motta, A.T. (1997) Amorphization of intermetallic compounds under irradiation: a Review. Journal of Nuclear Materials, 244, 227250 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murakami, T., Chakoumakos, B.C., Ewing, R.C., Lumpkin, G.R. and Weber, W.J. (1991) Alpha-decay damage in zircon. American Mineralogist, 76, 15101532 Google Scholar
Nasdala, L., Wenzel, M., Andrut, M., Wirth, R. and Blaum, P. (2001) The nature of radiohaloes in biotite: experimental studies and modeling. American Mineralogist, 86, 498512 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nasdala, L., Hanchar, J.M. Kronzc, A. and Whitehouse, M.J. (2005) Long-term stability of alpha particle damage in natural zircon. Chemical Geology, 220, 83103 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Nuclear Data Center (2013) Brookhaven Nuclear Science References. Chart of Nuclides version of 2013. (Information extracted from the NSR database based on ENSDF and Nuclear Data Sheets).Google Scholar
Pal, D.C. (2004) Concentric rings of radioactive halo in chlorite, Turamdih uranium deposit, Singhbhum Shear Zone, Eastern India:a possible result of 238U chain decay, Current Science, 87, 662667 Google Scholar
Palmgren, J. (1917). The eulysite of Södermanland. Bulletin of the Geological Institute of the University of Uppsala, 14, 109228 Google Scholar
Pouchou, J.L. and Pichoir, F. (1991) Quantitative analysis of homogeneous or stratified microvolumes applying the model “PAP”. Pp. 3175 in: Electron Probe Quantitation (K.F.J. Heinrich and D.E. Newbury, editors). Plenum Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redfern, S.A.T. (1996) Length scale dependence of high-pressure amorphization: static amorphization of anorthite. Mineralogical Magazine, 60, 493498 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosso, K.M. and Ilton, E.S. (2005) Effects of compositional defects on small polaron hopping in micas. Journal of Chemical Physics, 122, 244709.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seal, M., Vance, E.R. and Demayo, B. (1981) Optical spectra of giant radiohaloes in Madagascan biotite. American Mineralogist, 66, 358361 Google Scholar
Sundius, N. (1932) U¨ ber den sogennanten Eisenanthophyllit der Eulysite. Å rsbok, Sveriges Geologiske Undersökning, 26, 6118 Google Scholar
Tenderholt, A., Hedman, B. and Hodgson, K.O. (2007) PySpline: A modern, cross-platform program for the processing of raw averaged XAS edge and EXAFS data. American Institute of Physics Conference Proceedings, 882, 105107 13th International Conference on X-ray Absorption Fine Structure XAFS13.Google Scholar
Tomic, S., Searle, B.G., Wander, A., Harrison, N.M., Dent, A.J., Mosselmans, J.F.W. and Inglesfield, J.E. (2005) New Tools for the Analysis of EXAFS: The DL EXCURV Package. CCLRC Technical Report DL-TR-2005-001, ISSN 1362-0207.Google Scholar
Vance, E.R. (1978) Possible mechanism for the formation of bleached, giant haloes in Madagascan mica. Pp. 228235 in: Superheavy Elements: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Superheavy Elements, Lubbock, March 911 1978 (M.A.K. Lodhi, editor). Pergamon, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Virgo, D. and Popp, R.K. (2000) Hydrogen deficiency in mantle-derived phlogopites. American Mineralogist, 85, 753759 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, L.M., Eby, R.K., Janeczek, J. and Ewing, R.C. (1991) In situ TEM study of ion-beam-induced amorphization of complex silicate structures. Nuclear Instruments and Methods for Physics Research, B59/60, 395400 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waychunas, G.A., Apted, M.J. and Brown G.E., Jnr. (1983) X-ray K-edge absorption spectra of Fe minerals and model compounds: Near-edge structure. Physics and Chemistry of Minerals, 10, 19 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, W.J., Ewing, R.C. and Wang, L.M. (1994) The radiation-induced crystalline-to-amorphous transition in zircon. Journal of Materials Research, 9, 688698 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziegler, J.F. (2011) //SRIM: the Stopping and Range of Ions in Matter (www.srim.org).Google Scholar
Zhao, G.C., Cawood, P.A., Wilde, S.A. and Sun, M. (2002) Review of global 2.11 8 Ga orogens: implications for a pre-Rodinia supercontinent. Earth Science Reviews, 59, 125162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: Image

Pattrick et al. supplementary material

Supplementary Figure S1

Download Pattrick et al. supplementary material(Image)
Image 295.4 KB
Supplementary material: Image

Pattrick et al. supplementary material

Supplementary Figure S2

Download Pattrick et al. supplementary material(Image)
Image 427.8 KB