Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-04T12:13:30.841Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The uranium deposits of the Tete District, Mozambique

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2018

C. F. Davidson
Affiliation:
Geological Survey of Great Britain
J. A. E. Bennett
Affiliation:
Geological Survey of Great Britain

Extract

Early in 1947 an unusual mineral deposit was discovered at Mavuzi in the Tete district of Mozambique. The discovery was made by native boys searching for corundum on behalf of Senhor Mario Canuto de Carvalho, a Goanese prospector who had for some years been associated with primitive gold and corundum operations on the north bank of the Zambesi. The dominant ore-mineral in the new deposit was superficially similar to the pegmatitic samarskite found in small quantities in the mica-mining districts of the Alto Ligonha in eastern Mozambique; and when exposure of the mineral to a photographic plate confirmed that it was radioactive, the identification as samarskite was accepted both by local prospectors and by most of the field geologists who later worked on the deposits. The presence of uranium in the ore was first proven in a chemical analysis by the Southern Rhodesian Geological Survey.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1950

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bannister, (F. A.) and Horne, (J. E. T.), A radioactive mineral from Mozambique, related to davidite. Min. Mag., 1950. vol. 29, pp. 101-112.Google Scholar
Borges, (A.), Os depositos do Karroo no Distrito de Tete. Colόnia de Mozambique, Serviços de Indfistria e Geolόgia, Boletim, 1946. No. 8.Google Scholar
Mawsoze, (D.), The nature and occurrence of uraniferous mineral deposits in South Australia. Trans. Roy. Soc. South Australia, 1944. vol. 68, pp. 334-357.Google Scholar
Sandberger, (F.), Untersuchungen über Erzgünge. Wiesbaden, 1882-85, vol. 2, pp. 218-227, passim.Google Scholar
Stěp, (J.) and Becke, (F.), Das Vorkommen des Uranpecherzes zu St. Joachimsthal. Sitzungsber. Akad. Wiss. Wien, math.-naturw. KI., 1904. Abt. I, vol. 113, pp. 585-618.Google Scholar