Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-lrf7s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-04T10:55:29.011Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies on the zeolites. Part III. Natrollte and metanatrolite

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2018

Max H. Hey
Max H. Hey*
Affiliation:
Mineral Department of the British Museum of NaturM History
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

One of the most typical occurrences of natrolite, in the Puy-de-Dôme amygdaloids, formed the main type occurrence of R. J. Haüy's species Mcsotype (1801) ; but when A. F. Gehlen and J. N. Fuchs (1813) and J. N. Fuchs (1816) recognized the individuality of soda-, lime-, and lime-soda-mesotypes, and divided Haüy's species into three, they discarded Haüy's name altogether, using for the three new species the names natrolite, scolecite, and mesolite, Natrolite was not a new name, having been given in 1803 by M. H. Klaproth to the well-known yellow-banded fibrous-radiating zeolite from Württemberg. The name mesotype has persisted for the whole group (in which sense it will be used here); and for long the names soda-, lime-, and lime-soda-mesotype were used as well as Gehlen and Fuchs's names. In France, however, the name mesotype is used in a more restricted sense for natrolite only.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical magazine and journal of the Mineralogical Society , Volume 23 , Issue 139 , December 1932 , pp. 243 - 289
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1932

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1801 Haüy, R.J., Traité de Min. (Paris), vol 3, p. 153.Google Scholar
1801 Schumacher, C.F., Versuch eines Verzeichnisses der in den Döniseh-Nordischen Staaten sich findenden einfachen Mineralien (Copenhagen), p. 46.Google Scholar
1803 Klaproth, M. H., Neue Schrift. Naturf. Gesell. Berlin, vol. 4, p. 243 ; Beiträge Chem. Kennt. Minera!körpers, 1810, vol. 5, p. 49.Google Scholar
1803 Selb, C. J., Neue Schrift. Naturf. Gesell. Berlin, vol. 4, p. 395.Google Scholar
1811 Smithson, J., Phil. Trans., voL 101, p. 171 ; Anu. Physik (Gilbert), 1813, vol. 43, p. 240.Google Scholar
1811 Werner, A.G., quoted in C. A. S. Hoffmann, Min. (Freyberg), vol 2b, p. 303.Google Scholar
1813 Gehlen, A.F. and Fuchs, J. N., Schweigg. Journ. Chem. Phys., vol. 8, p. 353.Google Scholar
1816 Fuchs, J.N., Schweigg. Journ. Chem. Phys., vol. 18, p. 8.Google Scholar
1820 Brooke, H. J., Ann. Phil., vol. 16, p. 193.Google Scholar
1821 SirBrewster, David, Edinburgh Phil. Journ., vol. 5, p. 1.Google Scholar
1822 SirBrewster, David, Edinburgh Phil. Journ., vol. 7, p. 12.Google Scholar
1823 Phllips, W., Min., 3rd edit. (London), p. 123.Google Scholar
1825 Haidinoer, W., in F. Mohs, Min. (Edinburgh), vol. 2, p. 236.Google Scholar
1826 Guillemin, J., Ann. des Mines, ser. 1, vol. 12, p. 390.Google Scholar
1828 Esmark, H.M.T., Mag. Naturvid. Christiania, vol. 8 (for 1827), p. 323.Google Scholar
1828 Hüefeld, L., Schweigg. Journ. Chem. Phys., vol. 52, p. 361.Google Scholar
1828 Pfaff, C. H., Schweigg. Journ. Chem. Phys,, vol. 53, p. 391.Google Scholar
1834 Forbes, J. D., Phil. Mag., ser. 3, vol. 5, p. 133.Google Scholar
1834 Berzelius, J. (-. Sondén, analyst), Berz. Jahresber., vol. 14, p. 176.Google Scholar
1836 Thomson, T., Outlines Min. (London), vol. 1, pp. 317, 338.Google Scholar
1838 Yon Kobell, F., Journ. Prakt. Chem. (Erdmann), vol. 13, p. 7.Google Scholar
1840 Thomson, T., Phil. Mag., set. 3, vol. 17, p. 409.Google Scholar
1843 Blum, R., Die Pseudomorphosen des Mineralreichs. (Stuttgart), vol. 1, p. 60.Google Scholar
1843 Riess, P. and Rose, G., Ann. Phys. Chem. {Poggendorff), vol. 59, p. 373.Google Scholar
1845 Apjohn, J., Journ. Geol. Soc. Dublin, vol. 3, p. 120.Google Scholar
1845 Scheerer, T., Ann. Phys. Chem. (Poggendorff), vol. 65, p. 276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1845 Sander, [K. ?], in Rammelsberg, C. F., Handw Srterbuch Chem. Min., 2nd suppl., p. 89.Google Scholar
1847 Rxegel, E., Journ. Prakt. Chem. (Erdmann), vol. 40, p. 317.Google Scholar
1850 Gmelin, C. G., Ann. Phys. Chem. (Poggeudorff), vol. 81, p. 312.Google Scholar
1850 Kenngott, A., Sitzungsber. Akad. Wiss. Wien, vol. 5, p. 240.Google Scholar
1851 Bergemann, C., Ann. Phys. Chem. (Poggendorff), vol. 84, p. 491.Google Scholar
1852 Meneghini, G. (Bechi, E., analyst), Amer. Journ. Sci., ser. 2, vol. 14, p. 64.Google Scholar
1852 Rose, G. (- Korte, analyst), Krystallo-chem. Min.-Syst. (Leipzig), p. 96.Google Scholar
1852 Scott, A. J., Edinburgh New Phil. Journ., vol. 53, p. 283.Google Scholar
1852. Sillem, Neues Jahrb. Min., p. 526.Google Scholar
1853 yon Waltershausen, S., Vulk. Gesteine Sicilien und Islands. (GSttingen), p. 269.Google Scholar
1854 von Hauer, K., Sitzungsber. Akad. Wiss. Wien, vol. 12, p. 291.Google Scholar
1855 Haidinger, W., quoted in A. Kenngott, Sitzungsber. Akad. Wiss. Wien, vol. 16, p. 157.Google Scholar
1856 Heddle, M. F., Phil. Mag., ser. 4, vol. 11, p. 272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1857 Des|Cloizeaux, A., Ann. des Mines, ser. 5, vol. 11, p. 311.Google Scholar
1857 Ville, L. (- Vatonne, analyst), Ann. des Mines, ser. 5, vol. 12, p. 684.Google Scholar
1858 Blum, R. (- Carius, analyst), Ann. Phys. Chem. (Poggendorff), vol. 105, p. 143.Google Scholar
1858 Des Cloizeaux, A., Ann. des Mines, ser. 5, vol. 14, p. 355.Google Scholar
1858 Damour, A., Ann. Chim. Phys., ser. 3, vol. 53, p. 454.Google Scholar
1858 Erchhdrs, H., Ann. Phys. Chem. (Poggendorff), vol. 105, p. 130.Google Scholar
1858 Kenngott, A. (Hlasiwetz, H., analyst), Cbersicht Min. Forsch., p. 71.Google Scholar
1858 Sella, Q., Nuovo Cimeuto, vol. 7, p. 225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1858 SChEereR, T. (- Sieveking, analyst), Ann. Phys. Chem. (Poggendorff), vol. 108, p. 433.Google Scholar
1861 Brush, G. J., Amer. Journ. Sci., ser. 2, vol. 31, p. 365.Google Scholar
1862 Des Cloizeaux, A., Man. de Min. (Paris), vol. 1, p. 382.Google Scholar
1863 Von Lang, V., Phil. Mag., set. 4, vol. 25, p. 43.Google Scholar
1863 Michaelson, J.A., Journ. Prakt. Chem. (Erdmann), vol. 90, p. 106.Google Scholar
1863 Sæmann, L. and Pisani, F., Ann. Chim. Phys., ser. 3, vol. 67, p. 350.Google Scholar
1863 Scheerer, T., Ann. Phys. Chem. (Poggendorff), vol. 119, p. 145.9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1867 Des Cloizeaux, A., Nouv. Rceherches, &c. (Paris), pp. 74, 75.Google Scholar
1867 Joy, C.A., Ann. Lyceum Nat. Hist. New York, vol. 8, p. 123.Google Scholar
1868 Marsh, O. C., quoted in Dana, J. D., Syst. Min., 5th ed., p. 428.Google Scholar
1873 D'Achiardi, A. (F. Stagi, analyst), Min. Toscana. (Pisa), vol. 2, p. 141.Google Scholar
1873 Young, J.W., Chem. News, vol. 27, p. 56.Google Scholar
1874 Young, J.W., Peck, quoted in A. Frenzel, Min. Lexicon Sachsen. (Leipzig), p. 213.Google Scholar
1874 von Konen, A. (-. Klippert, analyst), [Sitzungsber. Gesell. Naturwiss. Marburg, no. 5] abstr, in Neues Jahrb. Min., 1875, p. 87.Google Scholar
1876 Lembero, J., Zeits. Deut. Geol. Gesell., vol. 28, p. 552.Google Scholar
1877 Seligmann, G., Zeits. Kryst. Min., vol. 1, p. 338.Google Scholar
1878 Dalmer, K., Neues Jahrb. Min., p. 257.Google Scholar
1879 Brøgger, W.C., Zeits. Kryst. Min., vo]. 3, p. 478 ; republished in Zeits. Kryst. Min., 1889, vol. 16, p. 598.Google Scholar
1879 Hankel, W. G., Annalen der Physik (Wiedemann), vol. 6, p. 51.; Sitzungsber. Sachs. Akad., 1883, vol. 12, p. 1.Google Scholar
1879 Preis, K. and Vaea, K., [Sitzungsber. BShm. Gesell. Wiss.]; abstr, in Zeits. Kryst. Min., 1880, vol. 4, p. 627.Google Scholar
1880 Von Eckenbrecher, C., Tschermaks Min. Petr. Mitt., vol. 3, p. 1.Google Scholar
1881 von Lasaulx, A., Zeits. Kryst. Min., vol. 5, p. 326.Google Scholar
1881 Luedecke, O., Neues Jahrb. Min., vol. 2, p. 38.Google Scholar
1884 Lorenze, J.., Meddel. om Grcnland, vol. 7, p. 1.Google Scholar
1884 Palla, E., Zeits. Kryst. Min., vol. 9, p. 386.Google Scholar
1885 Gonnard, F., Bull. Soc. Min. France, vol. 8, p. 123.Google Scholar
1885 Hillebrand, W. F., Bull. U.S. Geol. Survey, no. 20, p. 36 ; no. 419, 1910, p. 284.Google Scholar
1885 Stadtlander, C., Neues Jahrb. Min., vol. 2, p. 113.Google Scholar
1886 Mattirolo, E., Atti Accad. Torino, vol. 21, p. 848.Google Scholar
1886 Schmidt, C., Zeits. Kryst. Min., vol. 11, p. 587.Google Scholar
1887 Artznr, E., Atti (Mere.) Accad. Lincei, ser. 4, vol. 4, p. 76.Google Scholar
1887 Hersch, C. [Inaug.-Diss., Zürich, p. 13]; quoted in J. D. Dana, Syst. Min., 6th edit., 1892, p. 602.Google Scholar
1887 Joly, J., Proc. Roy.)c. London, vol. 41, p. 269.Google Scholar
1887 Lemberg, J., Zeits. Deut. Geol. Gesell., vol. 39, p. 581.Google Scholar
1887 Lindstrsm, G., Geol. FSr. F5rh. Stockholm, vol. 9, p. 436.Google Scholar
1888 Artini, E., Rend. R. Accad. Lincei, ser. 4, vol. 5, pp. 37, 51.Google Scholar
1888 Lemberg, J., Zeits. Deut. Geol. Gesell., vol. 40, p. 642.Google Scholar
1888 Lemberg Peck, J., [Abhandl. Naturf. Gesell. GSrlitz, voh 12, p. 160] ; quoted in H. Traube, Min. Sehlesiens. (Breslau), 1888, p. 146.Google Scholar
1889 Brøgger, W.C. (with optical measurements by J. Lorenzen and analyses by WickstrSm, E., Paijkull, G., Knutsen, E., and Missyon Hall, A.), Zeits. Kryst. Min., vol. 16, p. 598.Google Scholar
1889 Luzzato, G., Riv. Min. Crist. Ital., vol. 4, p. 54.Google Scholar
1890 Doelter, C., Tschermaks Min. Petr. Mitt., vol. 11, p. 327.Google Scholar
1890 Hyland, J. S., Proe. Roy. Soc. Dublin, ser. 2, vol. 6, p. 411.Google Scholar
1890 Negri, G. B., Riv. Min. Crist. Ital., vol. 7, p. 17.Google Scholar
1890 Rinne, F., Sitzungsber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss., vol. 14, p. 1163.Google Scholar
1890 Williams, J.F. (F. A. Genth, analyst), [Ann. Report Geol. Survey Arkansas, 1890, vol. 2] ; abstr, in Zeits. Kryst. Miu., 1894, vol. 22, p. 422.; also published in Genth, F. A. and Penfield, S. L., Amer. Journ. Sci., 1892, ser. 3, vol. 43, p. 189.Google Scholar
1891 Brauns, R., Optisch. Anomal. d. Krystalle. (Leipzig), p. 67.Google Scholar
1891 Gonnaad, F., Bull. Soc. FranT. Min., vol. 14, p. 165.Google Scholar
1892 Gonnaad, F., Bull. SCe. F~an?. Min., vol. 15, p. 221.Google Scholar
1892 Melville, W. H., Bull. U.S. Geol. Survey, no. 90, p. 38; no. 1910, 419, p. 284.Google Scholar
1892 Schneider, E.A. and Clark, F. W., Ber. Deut. Chem. Gesell., vol. 25, p. 883. Bull. U.S. Geol. Survey, 1893, no. 113, p. 34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1893 Zschau, E., Isis (Dresden), p. 90 ; Zeits. Kryst. Min.. 1896, vol. 25, p. 619.Google Scholar
1894 Thugutt, S.J. Neues Jahrb. Min., Beil.-Bd. 9, pp. 555, 600.Google Scholar
1894 Zimáanyx, K., Zeits. Krist. Min., vol. 22, p. 342.Google Scholar
1896 Friedel, G., Bull. Soc. Franç. Min., vol. 19, pp. 94, 117.Google Scholar
1896 Friedel, G., Cornpt. Rend. Acad. Sci. Paris, vol. 122, p. 1006.Google Scholar
1896 Yon Gümsel, C.W., Sitzungsber. K6nigl. Bayer. Akad. Wiss., vol. 26, p. 593.Google Scholar
1896 Lacroix, A., Bull. SCc. Frang. Min., vol. 19, p. 422.Google Scholar
1897 Tammann, G., Zeits. Physikal. Chem., vol. 27, p. 325.Google Scholar
1899 Riedel, G., Bull. Soc. Frang. Min., vol. 22, p. 84.Google Scholar
1899 Sterner, G., Journ. Amcr. Chem. SCc., vol. 21, p. 437.Google Scholar
1900 Clarke, F.W. and G. Stf.mEa, Zeits. Auorg. Chem., vol. 24, p. 139.; Bull. U.S. Geol. Survey, 1902, no. 207, p. 22 ; no. 419, 1910, p. 284 ; G. Steigcr, Bull. U.S. Geol. Survey, no. 262, 1905, p. 87.Google Scholar
1901 Billows, E., Riv. Min. Crist. Ital., vol. 27, p. 49.Google Scholar
1901 Heddle, M. F., Min. Scotland. (Edinburgh), vol. 2, pp. 103, 105.Google Scholar
1901 Pritchalcn, G.B. (E. O. Thiclc, analyst), Victorian Naturalist, vol. 18, p. 63.Google Scholar
1901 Zamsonihi, F., Zeits. Kryst. Min., vol. 34, p. 549.Google Scholar
1902 Pelikan, A., Sitzungsber. Akad. Wiss. Wien, Math.-naturwiss. Kl., Abt. I, vol. 111, p. 334.Google Scholar
1903 Spencer, L.J., Min. Mag., vol. 13, p. 373. (Third list of new mineral names.)Google Scholar
1904 Anderson, C., Rec. Austr. Mus., vol. 5, p. 127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1904 Eyerman, J., Amer. Geol., vol. 34, p. 43.Google Scholar
1904 Wada, T. (Matsumoto, O., analyst), Min. Japan. (TSkyS), p. 139.Google Scholar
1905 Currie, J., Trans. Edinburgh Geol. SCc., vol. 9, pp. 1–68.Google Scholar
1905 Gans, R., Jahrb. Preuss. Geol. Landesanstalt, vol. 26, p. 188.Google Scholar
1905 Steiger, G., Bull. U.S. Geol. Survey, no. 262, p. 87.Google Scholar
1905 Tschermak, G., Sitzungsber. Akad. Wiss. Wien, Math.-naturwiss. KI., Abt. I, vol. 114, p. 455.Google Scholar
1906 Glinka, K. D., [Tray. Soc. Naturalistes St. P~tersbourg, ser. 5, vol. 24, part 5, sect. géol. main., p. 1] ; abstr, in Zeits. Kryst. Min., 1909, vol. 46, p. 283.Google Scholar
1906 Goldschmidt, V. and Hermah, P., Neues Jahrb. Min., vol. 1, p. 20.Google Scholar
1906 Harrington, B. J., Trans. Roy. Soc. Canada, ser. 2, vol. 11, p. 25.Google Scholar
1906 Manasse, E., Proc. Verb. Soc. Toscana Sci. Nat., vol. 15, p. 20.Google Scholar
1906 Zambohini, F., Atti (Mere.)Accad. Lincei, CI. Sci. fis. mat. nat., Roma, ser. 5, vol. 6, p. 111.; Atti Accad. Sci. Fis. Mat. Napoli, 1908, ser. 2, vol. 14, p. ].17.Google Scholar
1907 Anderson, C., Rec. Austr. Mus., vol. 6, p. 420.Google Scholar
1907 Baschieri, F., Proc. Verb. Soc. Toscana Sci. Nat., vol. 16, p. 38.Google Scholar
1907 Freudehberg, W., Mitt. Badischen Geol. Landesanst., vol. 5, p. 340.Google Scholar
1908 Zambonini, F., Atti Accad. Sci. Fis. Mat. Napoli, ser. 2, vol. 14, pp. 117, 290; the latter also separate as Min. Vesuv. (Napoli), 1909, p. 290.Google Scholar
1909 Cesáro, G., Bull. Acad. Roy. Belg., p. 490.Google Scholar
1909 Görgey, R., Tschermaks Min. Petr. Mitt., vol. 28, p. 93.Google Scholar
1909 Ježek, B. (J. Švé;da, analyst), Rozpravy České Akad., class 2, vol. 18, no. 26 ; abstr, in Zeits. Kryst. Min., 1912, vol. 50, p. 638.Google Scholar
1909 Louderback, G.D. (--. Blasdale, analyst), Univ. California Publ., vol. 5, no. 23, p. 357 ; abstr, in Zeits. Kryst. Min., 1911, voh 50, p. 184.Google Scholar
1909 Thuovtt, S. J., Centr. Min., p. 677.Google Scholar
1910 Gonnard, F., Bull. Soc. Franç. Min., vol. 33, p. 279.Google Scholar
1910 Thugutt, S.J., Neues Jahrb. Min., vol. 1, p. 25.Google Scholar
1911 Eyermann, J., Min. Pennsylvania. (Easton, Penn.), vol. 2, p. 11.Google Scholar
1911 Schrit, A., Lotos, Prag, p. 275.Google Scholar
1911 Thugutt, S.J., Centr. Min., p. 405.Google Scholar
1912 Scheit, A., Tschermaks Min. Petr. Mitt., vol. 31, p. 495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1912 Thuoutt, S.J., [Compt. Rend. Soc. Sci. Varsovie, vol. 5, p. 100. ; abstr, in Neues Jahrb. Min., 1913, vol. 2, Ref. p. 34.Google Scholar
1913 Theile, M., [Inaug.-Diss., Leipzig] ; Neues Jahrb. Min., 1915, vol. 1, p. 16.Google Scholar
1914 MissBrihkeh, O. A. (P. Mozaleff, analyst), [Bull. Acad. Sci. St. Pötersbourg, p. 481] ; quoted in P. N. Chirvinsky (P. Tschirwinsky), Zeits. Krist., 1929, vol. 70, p. 278.Google Scholar
1914 Gunther-Schulze, A., Zeits. Physikal. Chem., vol. 89, p. 168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1915 Smirnov, V. P., IOn the question of the influence of humus compounds on the character of the weathering of aluminosilicates. (Kharkov)] ; M.A. 2-377, (1925).Google Scholar
1916 Ashcroft, F. N., Min. Mag., vol. 17, p. 305.Google Scholar
1916 Phillips, A. I'I., Amer. Journ. Sci., ser. 4, vol. 42, p. 472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1917 Hibsch, J. E., Tschermaks Min. Petr. Mitt., vol. 34, pp. 190, 194.Google Scholar
1917 Tschermak, G. (Pelikan, A. and Tschermak, G., analysts), Sitzungsber. Akad. Wiss. Wien, Math.-naturwiss. KI., Abt. I, vol. 126, p. 541. [M.A. 2-302.]Google Scholar
1918 Stoklossa, G., Neues Jahrb. Min., Beil.-Band 42, p. 1. [M.A. 1-153.]Google Scholar
1918 Tschermak, G., Sitzungsber. Akad. Wiss. Wien, Math.-naturwiss. KI., Abt. I, vol. 127, p. 177. [M.A. 2-302.]Google Scholar
1920 Rxcharz, S., Zeits. Deut. Geol. Gesell., vol. 72, p. 28. [M.A. 2-54.]Google Scholar
1921 Beutsll, A., Centr. Min., p. 701. [M.A. 2-57.]Google Scholar
1921 Koehiosrerger, J. and Moller, W. J., Neues Jahrb. Min., Beil.-Band44, p. 415. [M.A. 1-234.]Google Scholar
1921 Ondreĵ, A., Rozpravy Cesk4 Akad., class 2, vol. 30, no. 48. [M.A. 2-118.]Google Scholar
1922 Walker, T.L. and A. L. parson {Todd, E. W., analyst), Univ. Toronto Studies, Geol. Series, no. 14, pp. 19, 62. [M.A. 2-55.]Google Scholar
1923 Fersman, A. E., [Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. Russe, p. 61]; M.A. 2-263, (1924).Google Scholar
1923 Weigel, O., Zeits. Krist., vol. 58, p. 153. [M.A. 2-300.]Google Scholar
1924 Smirnov, N. N., [Works Min. Inst. Moscow Univ., pp. 1-47] ; M.A. 2-527, (1925).Google Scholar
1925 Labuntzov, A.N. (N. I. Vlodavetz, analyst), [Tray. Musée Geol. Min. Pierre le Grand, Acad. Sci. Russ., vol, 5, no. 2, pp. 17-32] ; M.A. 3-307, (1927).Google Scholar
1925 Winchell, A. N., Amer. Min., vol. 10, p. 112. [M.A. 3-13.]Google Scholar
1926 Fairbanks, E.E., Amer. Min., vol. 11, p. 251. [M.A. 4-324.]Google Scholar
1927 Cavinato, A., Mere. R. Accad. Lincei, C1. Sci. fis. mat. nat., Roma, scr. 6, vol. 2, p. 320. [M.A. 4-320.]Google Scholar
1928 Drescher, F.K. and H. Krueger, K. E., Neues Jahrb. Min., Beil.-Band 57, p. 597.Google Scholar
1928 Kappen, H. and Fischer, B., Zeits. Pflanzenernährung, Düngung und Bodenkunde, Tell. A., vol. 12, p. 8. [M.A. 4-317.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1928 Udluft, H., Arkiv Kemi, Min. Geol., vol. 9, no. 33. [M.A. 4-374.]Google Scholar
1929 Di Franco, S., Rend. R. Accad. Lincei, C1. Sei. fis. mat. nat., Roma, ser. 6, vol. 9, p. 657. [M.A. 5-82.]Google Scholar
1929 Grassi-Cristaldi, G. and Scafile, F., Annali Chim. Applic., vol. 19, p. 136. [M.A. 5-83-]Google Scholar
1930 Halla, F. and Mehl, E., Zeits. Krist., vol. 75, p. 421. [M.A. 4-466.]Google Scholar
1930 Kalb, G., Zeits. Krist., vol. 73, p. 561. [M.A. 4-352.]Google Scholar
1930 Parsons, A.L., Univ. Toronto Studies, Geol. Series, no. 29, p. 35. [M.A. 4-370.]Google Scholar
1930 Palling, L., Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., vol. 16, p. 453. [M.A. 4-464.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1930 Slonim, C., Zeits. Elektrochem., vol. 36, p. 439.Google Scholar
1931 Wyatt, J., Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. Paris, vol. 193, p. 666. [M.A. 5-84.]Google Scholar
1932 Halla, F. and Mehl, E., Zeits. Krist., vol. 83, p. 140. [M.A. 5-162.]Google Scholar
1932 Thugutt, S.J., Arch. Min. Soc. Sei. Varsovie, 1932, vol. 8, p. 141. [M.A. 5-163.]Google Scholar