Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qs9v7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T06:29:03.746Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The recalculation of amphibole analyses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2018

R. Phillips
R. Phillips*
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Durham
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

A good chemical analysis of an amphibole will give cation numbers that can be correlated in detail with the available lattice positions. The substitions that must be recognized are described. A more rigorous check of the analytical results becomes possible and the sources of error may be indicated.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical magazine and journal of the Mineralogical Society , Volume 33 , Issue 263 , December 1963 , pp. 701 - 711
Copyright
Copyright © 1963, The Mineralogical Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Addison, (C.C.), Addison, (W.E.), Neal, (G.H.), and Searp (J, H.), 1962. Journ. Chem. Sot., vol. 278, p. 1468.Google Scholar
Asklund, (B.), Brown, (W.L.), and SY∼TH, (J.V.), 1962. Amer. Min. vol. 47, p. 160.Google Scholar
[Bornemaiw-Starynkevich, (I.D.)] 1960. (Mere. All-Union Min. Soc.), vol. 89, p. 236.[M.A. 15-465].Google Scholar
Fairbaian, (H.W.), 1953. Geochimica Act., vol. 4, p. 143.Google Scholar
Ghose, (S.), 1961. Acta Cryst., vol. 14, p. 622.Google Scholar
Gibbs, (G.V.), Bloss, (F.D.), and , (S∼ielr, R.), 1960. Amer. Min., vol. 45, p. 974.Google Scholar
Gibbs, (G.V.), Miller, (J.L.), and Shell, (H.R.), 1962. Ibid., vol. 47, p. 75.Google Scholar
Hey, (M.H.), 1939. Min. Mag., vol. 25, p. 402.Google Scholar
Hey, (M.H.), 1954. Ibid., vol. 30, p. 481.Google Scholar
Hillebrand, (W.L.) and Lunder,L (G.E. F.), 1950. Applied Inorganic Anmysis. New York. (llth printing).Google Scholar
Lacroix, (A.), 1922. Min. Madagasca., vol. 1, p. 526.Google Scholar
Layton, (W.), 1959. Unpublished Ph. thesis, Durham.Google Scholar
Layton, (W.), and Phillips, (R.), 1960. Min. Mag., vol. 32, p. 659.Google Scholar
Leake, (B.E.), 1962. Japanese Journ. Geol. Geog., vol. 33, p. 1.Google Scholar
Mueller, (R.F.), 1962. Geochimica Act., vol. 26, p. 581.Google Scholar
Nicholls, (G.D.) and Zussman, (J.), 1955. Min. Mag., vol. 30, p. 717.Google Scholar
Rabbitt, (J.C.), 1948. Amer. Min., vol. 33, p. 263.Google Scholar
Riley, (J.P.), 1958. The Analys., vol. 83, p. 42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sundius, (N.), 1946. Sveriges Geologiska UndersSknin., vol. 40, No. 480.Google Scholar
Vernon, (R.H.), 1962. Amer. Min., vol. 47, p. 360.Google Scholar
Vincent, (E.A.), 1953. Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. 109, p. 21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittaker, (E.J.W.), 1949. Acta Cryst., vol. 2, p. 312.Google Scholar
Whittaker, (E.J.W.), 1960. Ibid., vol. 13, p. 291.Google Scholar
Zussman, (J.), 1955. Ibid., vol. 8, p. 301.Google Scholar