Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-q6k6v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T10:20:39.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On a crystal of augelite from California

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2018

M. A. Peacock
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
D. A. Moddle
Affiliation:
Ontario Department of Mines

Extract

Augelite was originally described from Sweden by Blomstrand (1868) who obtained the composition 2Al2O3.P2O5.3H2O from a massive mineral with cleavage in three directions. No further description of this inadequately defined mineral appeared until Prior and Spencer (1895) gave their complete and exact characterization of well-crystallized material from Machacamarca, department Potosi, Bolivia, supplemented by observations by Spencer (1898, 1907) on further finds at Tatasi, department Potosi, and at Oruro, Bolivia.

Lemmon (1935) first recognized augelite as cleavage masses in the commercial deposit of andalusite at White Mountain, Mono County, California, and gave determinative observations which established the identity of the mineral. In this locality Kerr (1932) had noted corundum, diaspore, pyrophyllite, alunite, lazulite, and rutile, associated with the andalusite. In addition to these minerals Professor Joseph Murdoch of the University of California at Los Angeles, has found small, white, tabular crystals of apatite in a specimen carrying augelite. Crystals of augelite from this deposit, with a number of new forms, were mentioned by Pough (1936) in an inconspicuous notice which we did not see until our work was nearly done.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1941

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blomstrand, (C. W.), 1868. Om Westanå Mineralier. Öfvers. Vetensk.-Akad. Förh. Stockholm, vol. 25, pp. 197212.Google Scholar
Donnay, (J. D. H.), 1938. Le développement des zones cristallines. Ann. Soc. Géol. Belgique, vol. 61, pp. 260287. [M.A. 7–242.]Google Scholar
Donnay, (J. D. H.) and Harker, (D.), 1937. A new law of crystal morphology extending the law of Bravais. Amer. Min., vol. 22, pp. 446467. [M.A. 7–241.]Google Scholar
Donnay, (J. D. H.) 1940. Nouvelles tables d'extinctions pour les 230 groupes de recouvrements cristallographiques. Naturaliste Canadien, vol. 67, pp. 3369. [M.A, 8–4.]Google Scholar
Kerr, (P. F.), 1932. The occurrence of andalusite and related minerals at White Mountain, California. Econ. Geol., vol. 27, pp. 614643. [M.A. 5–288.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemmon, (D. M.), 1935. Augelite from Mono County, California. Amer. Min., vol. 20, pp. 664668. [M.A. 6–288.]Google Scholar
Martin, (A. J. P.), 1931. On a new method of detecting pyroelectricity. Min. Mag., vol. 22, pp. 519523.Google Scholar
Pough, (F. H.), 1936. New York Mineralogical Club, American Museum of Natural History, New York City, May 20, 1936. Amer. Min., vol. 21, p. 536.Google Scholar
Prior, (G. T.) and Spencer, (L. J.), 1895. Augelite. Min. Mag., vol. 11, pp. 1623.Google Scholar
Spencer, (L. J.), 1898. Augelite from a new locality in Bolivia. Min. Mag., vol. 12, pp. 14.Google Scholar
Spencer, (L. J.), 1907. Notes on some Bolivian minerals (jamesonite, andorite, cassiterite, tourmaline, &c.), with chemical analyses by G. T. Prior. Min. Mag., vol. 14, pp. 308344.Google Scholar
Taylor (E. D., ), 1940. Stephanite morphology. Amer. Min., vol. 25, pp. 327337. [M.A. 8–7.]Google Scholar