Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-rnpqb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-04T10:54:19.351Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A new micro-pyknometric method for the specific gravity of heavy solids; with a note on the accuracy of specific gravity determinations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2018

F. A. Bannister  and
Max H. Hey
F. A. Bannister
Affiliation:
Mineral Department of the British Museum
Max H. Hey
Affiliation:
Mineral Department of the British Museum
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The determination of the specific gravity of a solid which is only available in small quantity has always been a difficult problem in cases where the suspension method fails, either because the solid is too dense, or because it dissolves in or reacts with the heavy liquids available. It is hoped that the following method will be found a useful addition to the numerous methods which have been proposed from time to time to meet such cases. References to most of these methods are given at the end of the paper. Neither the new method nor any one of the older ones is universally applicable, and the best method for any particular case will depend on many circumstances.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical magazine and journal of the Mineralogical Society , Volume 25 , Issue 160 , March 1938 , pp. 30 - 34
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1938

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1879 Thoulet, J., Bull. Soc. Min. France, vol. 2, p. 189.Google Scholar
1887 Streng, A., Ber. Oberhess. Gesell. Giessen, vol. 25, p. 110.Google Scholar
1888 Joly, J., Phil. Mag., ser. 5, vol. 26, p. 29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1889 Retgers, J.W., Zeits. Physikal. Chem., vol 4, p. 189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1895 The Earl of Berkeley, Min. Mag., vol. 11, p. 64.Google Scholar
1903 Behr, J., Neues Jahrb. Min., vol.1, p. 143.Google Scholar
1910 Sommerfeldt, E., Centr. Min., p. 482.Google Scholar
1911 Andreae, J.L., Zeits. Physikal. Chem., vol. 76, p. 491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1928 Ellswoitth, H.V., Min. Mag., vol. 21, p. 431.Google Scholar
1931 Wulff, P. and Heigl, A., Zeits. Physikal. Chem., vol. 153, p. 187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1934 Hauptmann, H. and Schulze., G. E. R., Zeits. Physikal. Chem., Abt. A, vol. 171, p. 36. [M.A. 6–447.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1935 Syromyatnikov, F.V., Amer. Min., vol. 20, p. 364. [M.A. 6–447.]Google Scholar