Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-26T04:31:09.578Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Basaluminite and hydrobasaluminite, two new minerals from Northamptonshire

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2018

S. E. Hollingworth  and
F. A. Bannister
S. E. Hollingworth
Affiliation:
University College, London
F. A. Bannister
Affiliation:
Mineral Department, British Museum
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

White mineral coating joint-faces in quarries in the Northampton ironstone (Inferior Oolite) was long ago recorded as allophane. W. D. Herman who determined the mineral from the surface of a sandstone rock in a quarry opened in 1871 also analysed an unnamed white earthy mineral from crevices in the ironstone and obtained a composition close to that of fully hydrated halloysite.

During the six-inch geological survey of that ironstone field in 1939–44 the occurrence of similarly situated white incrustations and joint infillings was found to be widespread especially in the shallow workings where the ferrous minerals chamosite and chalybite have been oxidizedto produce a limonitie ore.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical magazine and journal of the Mineralogical Society , Volume 29 , Issue 208 , March 1950 , pp. 1 - 17
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1950

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bannister, (F.A.) & Hollingworth, (S.E.), 1948. Nature, London, vol. 162, p. 565. [M.A. 10452.]Google Scholar
Bassett, (H.) and Goodwin, (T.H.), 1949. Journ. Chem. Soc. London, p. 2239.Google Scholar
Bemmelen, (J. M. van), 1904. Zeits. Anorg. Chem., vol. 42, p. 265.Google Scholar
Bunn, (C.W.), 1945. Chemical crystallography. Oxford, p. 132. [M.A. 9–217.]Google Scholar
Clarke, (F.W.), 1920. The data of geochemistry. 4th edit., Bull. U.S. Geol. Surv., no. 695, p. 495.Google Scholar
Dana, (J.D.) & Brush, (G.J.), 1868. A system of mineralogy, 5th edit., p. 420.Google Scholar
Gladstone, (G.) and (J. H.), 1862. Phil. Mag., ser. 4, vol. 23, p. 461.Google Scholar
Herman, (W.D.), 1871. Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. London, vol. 27, p. 234.Google Scholar
Hollingworth, (S.E.), Taylor, (J. H.), and Kellaway, (G.A.), 1944. Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. London, vol. 100, pp. 144.Google Scholar
Hollingworth, (S.E.) and Taylor, (J.H.), 1946. Proc. Geol. Assoc., vol. 57, pp. 204–233.Google Scholar
Larsen, (E.S.), 1921. Bull. U.S. Geol. Surv., no. 679, pp. 74, 118, 209, 241.Google Scholar
Lassaigne, (J.L.), 1823. Ann. Chim. Physique, Paris, ser. 2, vol. 24, p. 97.Google Scholar
Robinson, (G.W.), 1936. Soils, their origin, constitution and classiflcation, 2nd edit.Google Scholar
Taylor, (J.H.), 1949. Petrology of the Northampton Sand ironstone formation. Mem. Geol. Surv.Google Scholar
Weaver, (T.), 1824. Trans. Geol. Soc. London, ser. 2, vol. 1, p. 351.Google Scholar
Wernecke, (L.), 1932. Eng. Min. Journ. New York, vol. 133, pp. 38–43.Google Scholar
Woodward, (H.B.), 1894. Mem. Geol. Surv., vol. 4.Google Scholar
Záruba-Pfeffermann, (Q.), 1943. Mitt. Tschech. Akad. Wiss., vol. 53, no. 15, 33 pp.Google Scholar