Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-c654p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-26T20:44:49.875Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An electron-microscope study of peristerite plagioclases

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2018

S. G. Fleet  and
P. H. Ribbe
S. G. Fleet
Affiliation:
Department of Mineralogy and Petrology, University of Cambridge
P. H. Ribbe
Affiliation:
Crystallographic Laboratory, Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, and Department of the Geophysical Sciences, University of Chicago
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Plagioclase feldspars in the peristerite range An2-An17 have been investigated by transmission electron-microscopy and electron diffraction. All except the more anorthite-rich specimens were found to be unmixed into albite and oligoclase lamellae, between a few hundred and several thousand Å thick and approximately parallel to . A discussion is given of the part played by these lamellae when optical schiller is exhibited; and the effect of heat treatment on the lamellar structure and optical schiller is described.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical magazine and journal of the Mineralogical Society , Volume 35 , Issue 269 , March 1965 , pp. 165 - 176
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boggild, (O. B.), 1924. Kgl. danske vidansk. Sclsk., vol. 6, no. 3, p. 1.Google Scholar
Bowen, (N. L.), 1913. Amer. Journ. Sci., ser. 4, vol.35, p. 577.Google Scholar
Brown, (W. L.), 1960. Zeits. Krist., vol. 113, p. 330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, (W. L.), 1962. Norsk. Geol. Tidsskr., vol. 42, p. 354.Google Scholar
Donnay, (G.), Wyart, (J.), and Sabatier, (G.), 1959. Zeits. Krist., vol. 112, p. 161.Google Scholar
Emmons, (R. C.), editor, 1953. Mem. Geol. Soc. Anmr., no. 52.Google Scholar
Ferguson, (R. B.), Traill, (R. J.), and Taylor, (W. H.), 1958. Acta Cryst., vol. 11, p. 331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleet, (S. G.) and Ribbe, (P. H.), 1963. Phil. Mug., ser. 8, vol. 8, p. 1170.Google Scholar
Gay, (P.), 1962. Norsk Geol. Tidsskr., vol. 42, p. 37.Google Scholar
Gay, (P.) and Smith, (J. V.), 1955. Aeta Cryst., vol. 8, p. 64.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, (J. R.), 1952. Journ. Geol., vol. 60, p. 288.Google Scholar
Jeffries, (C. D.), 1936. Thesis, Univ. of Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Laves, (F.), 1951. Amcr. Cryst. Ass., Abstr. Washington meeting, p. 33.Google Scholar
Laves, (F.), 1954. Journ. Geol., vol. 62, p. 409.Google Scholar
Meen, (V. B.), 1933. Univ. Toronto Studies, Geol. Ser. no. 35, p. 37.Google Scholar
Orville, (P. M.), 1962. :Norsk Geol. Tidsskr., vol. 42, p. 283.Google Scholar
Raman, (C. V.), Jayaraman, (A.), and Srinivasan, (T. K.), 1950. Indian Aead. Sci., ser. A, vol. 32, p. 123.Google Scholar
Ribre, (P. H.), 1960. Amer. Min., vol. 45, p. 626.Google Scholar
Ribre, (P. H.), 1962. Norsk. Geol. Tidsskr., vol. 42, p. 138.Google Scholar
Ribre, (P. H.) and VAN Cott, (C. H.), 1962. Canadian Min., vol. 7, p. 278.Google Scholar
Saucier, (H.) and Saplevitch, (A.), 1962. Norsk. Geol. Tidsskr., vol. 42, p. 224.Google Scholar
Schneider, (T. R.), 1957. Zeits. Krist., vol. 109, p. 245.Google Scholar
Smith, (J. V.), 1956. Min. Mug., vol. 31, p. 47.Google Scholar
Waring, (J.), 1961. Thesis, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Wyart, (J.) and Sabatier, (G.), 1962. Norsk. Geol. Tidsskr., vol. 42, p. 317.Google Scholar