Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g78kv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-04T08:19:11.121Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Note on the thirty-two classes of symmetry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2018

Harold Hilton*
Affiliation:
Magdalen College, Oxford

Extract

Considerable confusion exists with regard to the nomenclature of the thirty-two possible classes of symmetry and their classification into systems. Each class is usually denoted by a name and a symbol ; but as every author invents his own names and symbols (the latter being often merely arbitrary numbers) the whole nomenclature is hopelessly confused. This is due to the fact that a different classification into systems, and consequently a different nomenclature is suggested according as the subject is approached (1) from the geometrical aspect based on the law of rational indices alone, (2) from the aspect of the structure-theory, (3) from the aspect of the practical crystallographer. Thus, for example, Dr. A. Schoenflies finds two distinct classifications necessary according as the subject is approached from aspect (1) or (2).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1907

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Page 261 note 1 ‘Krystallsysteme und Krystallstructur,’ 1891, pp. 146 and 148.

Page 261 note 2 As is done by T. Liebisch in his ‘Grundriss der physikalischen Krystallographle’ (1896), though he does not point out the logical conclusion of his method.