Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-23T21:38:36.864Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Preparing Biological Samples for Analysis by High Vacuum Techniques

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2018

S.G. Ostrowski ,
T.L. Paxon ,
L. Denault ,
KP. McEvoy  and
V.S. Smentkowski
S.G. Ostrowski*
Affiliation:
General Electric Global Research Center, Niskayuna, NY
T.L. Paxon
Affiliation:
General Electric Global Research Center, Niskayuna, NY
L. Denault
Affiliation:
General Electric Global Research Center, Niskayuna, NY
KP. McEvoy
Affiliation:
General Electric Global Research Center, Niskayuna, NY
V.S. Smentkowski
Affiliation:
General Electric Global Research Center, Niskayuna, NY
*
ostrowss@research.ge.com

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Time of flight secondary ion mass spectrometry (ToF-SIMS) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) provide valuable complementary information about the molecular composition and morphology of biological samples, but both techniques are performed under high vacuum, which is not compatible with hydrated samples. Designing a suitable method to prepare biological (hydrated) samples for high vacuum conditions is important to obtain reliable and scientifically meaningful results from ToF-SIMS and SEM and to enable the routine use of these techniques for characterization. This article will compare freeze-drying and critical point drying for preparing adherent and nonadherent cells for ToF-SIMS and SEM analyses.

Type
Research Article
Information
Microscopy Today , Volume 17 , Issue 2 , March 2009 , pp. 48 - 53
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America 2009

References

1. Jacoby, M. C&E News 2006, 84, 55–56.Google Scholar
2. Vickerman, J. C.; Briggs, D. ToF-SIMS: Surface Analysis by Mass Spectrometry; IM Publications and SurfaceSpectra Ltd: Chichester, West Sussex, 2001.Google Scholar
3. Smith, D.R.; Lorey, D.R.; Chandra, S. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2004, 231-232, 457–461.Google Scholar
4. Wu, K.J.; Odom, R.W. Anal. Chem. 1996, 68, 873–882.Google Scholar
5. Roddy, T.P.; Cannon, D.M. Jr.; Ostrowski, S.G.; Winograd, N.; Ewing, A.G. Anal Chem 2002, 74, 4020–4026.Google Scholar
6. Altelaar, A.F.M.; van Minnen, J.; Jimenez, C.R.; Heeren, R.M.A.; Piersma, S.R. Anal Chem 2005, 77, 735–741.Google Scholar
7. Ostrowski, S.G.; Van Bell, C.T.; Winograd, N.; Ewing, A.G. Science 2004, 305, 71–73.Google Scholar
8. Cannon, D. M.; Pacholski, M. L.; Winograd, N.; Ewing, A. G. J Am Chem Soc 2000, 122, 603–610.Google Scholar
9. Chandra, S.; Smith, D.R.; Morrison, G.H. Anal Chem 2000, 72, 104a-114a.Google Scholar
10. Echlin, P. Low-Temperature Microscopy and Analysis Plenum Press, New York Google Scholar
11. Severs, N.J.; Shotton, D.M. Rapid Freezing, Freeze-Fracture, and Deep Etching Wiley-Liss, New York, 1995.Google Scholar
12. ION-TOF GmbH, Gievenbecker Weg 15, 48149 Muenster, Germany, http://www.ion-tof.com/ Google Scholar
13. McMahon, J. M.; Short, R. T.; McCandlish, C. A.; Brenna, J. T.; Todd, P. J. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 1996, 10, 335-340.Google Scholar