Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-v5vhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-03T17:36:07.115Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Surface Analysis of Shear Strength Tested Tungsten Carbide Thermal Spray Coatings+

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

S. V. Naidu
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Grambling State University, Grambling, LA71245
Carlos Green
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Grambling State University, Grambling, LA71245
Christopher Maxie
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Grambling State University, Grambling, LA71245
James D. Garber
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Southwestern Louisiana, Lafayette, LA70504.
Gary A. Glass
Affiliation:
Acadiana Research Laboratory, University of Southwestern Louisiana, Lafayette, LA70504
Get access

Extract

Thermal spray processing has become an important powder-consolidation technique to yield new materials for extremes of temperature, radiation, wear, corrosion and mechanical stresses. High Velocity Oxy-Fuel (HVOF) spray coating process gives higher deposition densities and coating hardness; lower oxide content and porosity. The adhesive strength of thermal spray coatings is greatly effected by the interfacial impurities. The ring shear test method shown in Fig. 1 appears to give the most accurate results on shear adhesive strength. A typical ring shear test result of 88WC12Co 1/4" ring HVOF thermal spray coating on 4140 steel rod using a Jet kote thermal spray gun is shown in Fig. 2. Repeated ring shear tests on similar samples prepared under same spray and test conditions resulted in different shear bond strength and coating ring displacement before break off. We examined the ring shear tested coatings using a Zeiss DMS942 Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) and Kevex Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectrometer (EDXS) with LPX1 Quantum Si(Li) Detector.

Type
Oxidation, Corrosion, and Protective Coatings
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Sudarshan, T. S. and Jeandin, M. (Eds.), Surface Modification Technology VIII, The Institute of Metals 1994; Kuroda, S., et al., J. of Therm. Spray Tech. 4 (1995) 75.Google Scholar
Naerheim, Y., et al., Surf. Eng. 11 (1995) 66; Brandt, O., J. Therm. Spray Tech. 4 (1995) 147.10.1179/sur.1995.11.1.66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hong, T., et al., Phys. Rew. B47 (1993) 13615; PRL. 70 (1993) 615 and 72 (1994) 4021.10.1103/PhysRevB.47.13615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haanappel, V., et al., Oxid. Met. 43 (1995) 459; Ernst, F., Mater. Sci. Eng. R14 (1995)97. Work partly supported by the US Department of Energy and the Louisiana Board of Regents under contract # DOE/LEQSF(1993-95)-03.10.1007/BF01046893CrossRefGoogle Scholar