Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-pkt8n Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-22T11:07:28.388Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Strategies For Immunodissection Of The Connective Tissue Matrix And Basement Membranes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

Douglas R. Keene
Affiliation:
Research Unit, Shriners Hospital for Children, Portland, Oregon97201
Sara F. Tufa
Affiliation:
Research Unit, Shriners Hospital for Children, Portland, Oregon97201
Get access

Extract

Connective tissue matrices are quite diversified and include that composing skin, tendon, bone, cartilage, cornea and many others. The main component of the connective tissue matrix is collagen, composing approximately 70% of the dry weight of the human body. More members of the collagen family are discovered each year, with over twenty types described to date. Many of these collagens are tissue specific. In addition to the collagens, the connective tissue matrix is also the residence of epithelial and endothelial basement membranes and many other molecules including a variety of proteoglycans and elastic fiber components. The cells within the matrix are highly differentiated and task specific.

Using immunocytochemical technique applied at the level of the electron microscope, we have focused our resources to understand the structure and functional role of these matrix molecules.

Type
Highlights Of Biological Microscopy In The Pacific Northwest Usa
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1) Sakai, and Keene, , Fibrillin: monomers and microfibrils. In Methods in Enzymology 245: (1994) Academic Press, pp.2952.Google Scholar

2) Keene, et al., Micros. Res. Tech. 38: (1997)394.3.0.CO;2-J>CrossRefGoogle Scholar

3) Rousselle, et al., J. Cell Biol. 114: (1991)567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

4) Keene, and McDonald, , J. Histochem. Cytochem. 41: (1993) 1141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

5) Keene, et al., J. Histochem. Cytochem. 39:(1991)441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

6) Kuo, et al., Eur. J. Biochem. 232:(1995)364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7) This work was supported by the Shriners Hospital for ChildrenGoogle Scholar