Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-l4ctd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-11T15:22:31.926Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Role of Scanning Electron Microscopy in Taxonomic Studies of Freshwater Bryozoans (Ectoprocta: Phylactolaemata)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

T. S. Wood
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Wright State University, Dayton, OH45435
C. A. Taylor
Affiliation:
Department of Anatomy, Wright State University, Dayton, OH45435
Get access

Extract

Bryozoans are among the most common multicellular animals that attach to submerged surfaces in fresh waters. Zooids of the colony capture and digest suspended food particles; they also produce distinctive asexual buds called statoblasts. Measuring 0.35 to nearly 1 mm in diameter, statoblasts have a chitinous exterior and are the only truly hard parts of the bryozoan colony. Like the mastax of rotifers or mouthparts of midge larvae, statoblasts show a variety of taxonomically significant features. Scanning electron microscopy reveals clear patterns in statoblast surface topography that suggest many more species than the 60 or so normally recognized.

Statoblast surface features were first used to distinguish species of the genus Fredericella. The European F. sultana, with a smooth statoblast surface, had been assumed to occur worldwide. SEM micrographs showed the statoblast surface of New World Fredericella to be finely pitted, identical to that of F. indica in India (Figure 1). Another Fredericella species, not yet named, is distinguished only by its highly rugose statoblast surface (Figure 2). Such features are retained through generations of laboratory rearing under various controlled conditions.

Type
Non-Vertebrate Biology
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

references

1.Geimer, G. and Massard, J., Trav. Sci. du Musée d’Hist. Nat, Luxembourg. (1986).Google Scholar
2.Mundy, S., J. Zool. London (1980)192.Google Scholar
3.Wood, T. and Bachus, B., Hydrobiologia (1992)237.10.1007/BF00005850Google Scholar
4.Lacourt, A., Zool. Varhandel. (1968)93.Google Scholar