Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T15:11:57.471Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Next for EDS? SDD Arrays, GeDDs, and a 40-Year Paradigm Overturned

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2018

Richard B. Mott
Richard B. Mott*
Affiliation:
XrayMaps.Com, Lambertville, NJ

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Abstract
Information
Microscopy and Microanalysis , Volume 24 , Supplement S1: Proceedings of Microscopy & Microanalysis 2018 , August 2018 , pp. 722 - 723
Copyright
© Microscopy Society of America 2018 

References

[1] Niculae, A., et. al, Microsc. Microanal. 20(S3 2014) p. 1124.Google Scholar
[2] Schamber, F., et. al U.S. Patent Appl. No. 15/224,628, Pub. No. US 2018/0033589 A1, (2018).Google Scholar
[3] Statham, P. J. Acta, Microchim. [Suppl.] 15 1998) p. 1–9.Google Scholar
[4] Lowe, B. G. Sareen, R. A. in Semiconductor X-Ray Detectors. CRC Press Boca Raton p 266.Google Scholar
[5] Luke, P. N. Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A 271 1988) p. 567.Google Scholar
[6] Statham, P. J. X-Ray Spectrometry 6(2 1977) p. 94.Google Scholar
[7] “Scanning Electron Microscopy and X-Ray Microanalysis”, ed. Goldstein et al, 4th ed. (Springer Nature, New York).Google Scholar
[8] Mott, R. B. Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A 624(2 2010) p. 265.Google Scholar
[9] The author gratefully acknowledges Owen E. Healy, who analyzed the data in Figure 2 and refused to succumb to proof by appeal to authority. You were right. It just took a while to figure out why.Google Scholar