Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T19:09:05.517Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Immunoperoxidase Labeling Demonstrates an Early Divergence of Chlamydia Trachomatis from the Endosomal-Lysosomal Pathway

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

Elizabeth R. Fischer
Affiliation:
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Rocky Mountain Laboratories, 903 South 4thStreet, Hamilton, MT59840
Marci A. Scidmore-Carlson
Affiliation:
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Rocky Mountain Laboratories, 903 South 4thStreet, Hamilton, MT59840
Ted Hackstadt
Affiliation:
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Rocky Mountain Laboratories, 903 South 4thStreet, Hamilton, MT59840
Get access

Extract

Chlamydia trachomatis is responsible for several significant human diseases including trachoma, the primary source of preventable blindness in developing countries, and is the most common cause of sexually transmitted disease. C. trachomatis is an obligate intracellular prokaryote (ICP) relying on eukaryotic host cells for growth and replication. Typically, microorganisms engulfed by host cells, are trafficked through maturing endosomes to the lysosomal pathway and ultimately destroyed. Survival in a host cell requires the invading organism to either adapt or modify their host environment to avoid fusion with lysosomal vesicles. Organisms such as Mycobacterium tuberculosis have evolved mechanisms to arrest maturation of the endosomes, such that they avoid lysosomal fusion.3 C trachomatis has developed alternative strategies for successful intracellular survival and growth.

C. trachomatis exists in two morphologically and functionally distinct forms which multiply in vacuoles termed inclusions. A small dense form known as the elementary body (EB), is the stable extracellular stage of the life cycle capable of attachment and entry into host cells.

Type
Dynamics of Cellular Membrane Traffic
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Gruenberg, J. and Maxfield, F.R., Current Opin in Cell Biol(1995)7:552563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2. Rabinowitz, , et al., J. of Cell Bio(l992)l16(1)95112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

3. Clemens, D., Trends in Microbio(1996)4(3)113118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

4. Hackstadt, T., et al., EMBO J.(1996)15:964977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

5. Beatty, W., et al., Microbiol Review(1994)58(4)686699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

6. Scidmore, M.A., et al., Infect. & Immwn.(1996)64:53665372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7. Heizen, , et al., Infect. & Immun.(l996)64:796809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar