Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-wpx69 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-07T14:20:12.727Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Image Formation With Upper and Lower Secondary Electron Detectors in the Low Voltage Field-Emission SEM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

J. Liu*
Affiliation:
Science and Technology, Monsanto Company, St. Louis, MO, 63167
Get access

Extract

High-resolution secondary electron (SE) imaging was first demonstrated at 100 kV in the STEM a decade ago. High-resolution SE imaging is now routinely obtainable in field-emission SEMs. Although nanometer-scale surface features can be examined at low incident beam voltages we still do not fully understand the factors that affect the contrast of low voltage SE images. At high incident beam voltages, SE1 (SEs generated by the incident probe) and SE2 (SEs generated by backscattered electrons at the sample surface) can be spatially separated. SE1 carries high-resolution detail while SE2 contributes to background. At low incident beam voltages, however, the interaction volume of the incident electrons shrinks rapidly with decreasing incident beam voltage. Thus, both the SE1 and SE2 signals carry high-resolution information. At low incident beam voltages, SE3 (SEs generated by backscattered electrons impinging on the sample chamber, pole pieces and etc.) also carries high-resolution detail and contributes significantly to the collected signal, especially for high atomic number materials and at short working distances.

Type
New Trends in Scanning Electron Microscopy and Microanalysis
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Imeson, D. et al., Ultramicroscopy 17 (1985) 243; Liu, J. and Cowley, J. M., Ultramicroscopy 23 (1987) 463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Liu, J., Proc. Microscopy and Microanalysis 1997 (1997) 1215; Liu, J. et al., ibid., 1223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar