Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-sh8wx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T17:26:34.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Effects of Cigarette Smoke on Porcine Airway Epithelium

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

Darrell D. Morgan
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology and Wildlife Science, Auburn University, Auburn, AL36849.
Anthony G. Moss
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology and Wildlife Science, Auburn University, Auburn, AL36849.
Get access

Extract

Cephalad pulmonary mucociliary clearance driven by cilia of the ciliated airway epithelium provides probably the most important line of defense against inhaled toxins and particulate material for organs of the thoracic cavity. We demonstrate the reorganization of the cytoskeleton and the endoplasmic reticulum of airway epithelial cells upon cigarette smoke inhalation by employing DIC, LSCM, TEM and widefield fluorescence microscopy and have correlated this reorganization to changes in ciliary beat frequency (CBF) via FFT analysis. Neonatal pigs were used to provided healthy tracheal epithelial tissue. Exposure to cigarette smoke causes rapid ultrastructural changes including: ciliary distortion and detachment, ciliary abscission and severe alteration in endoplasmic reticulum structure suggesting profound disruption of essential membrane-cytoskeletal linkages.

To examine changes in CBF we describe a simple approach, using a laser scanning confocal microscope (LSCM) and an analog-to-digital computer converter/analyzer for the acquisition of data from biological systems that undergo rapid periodic movement, such as ciliary motion.

Type
Pathology
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References:

1.Wanner, A., American Review of Respiratory Disorder, (1977) 116: 73125.Google Scholar
2.Aiello, E., Physiological Zoology, (1970) 43:6070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Kamiya, R., and Hasegawa, E., Experimental Cell Research (1987) 173:299304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar