Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-dtkg6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-12T02:36:12.314Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Current State of the Art of Digital Imaging in the SEM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

John M. Mackenzie*
Affiliation:
Center for Electron Microscopy, North Carolina State University, RaleighN.C., 27695
Get access

Extract

Digital image acquisition in the SEM is poised to take over conventional methods of image recording. Because a majority of researchers use Polaroid film which only records about 1,000 lines of information, the acquisition systems available today are capable of matching and possibly exceeding the resolution of this medium.

Several methods are available to accomplish the acquisition task, and they each have certain benefits and disadvantages. by far the simplest and least expensive is to digitize the video output from the SEM when available. Under some conditions the video output can be digitized directly. The advantage of this method is cost. A single frame video digitizer costs less than $200. The signal, however, is usually very noisy. Because the human eye “sees” at a slower rate than video, we normally are “seeing” a 10-20 frame average. When we choose one frame, the results are too noisy. Fortunately, for under $1,500, digitizers that average frames are available. With multiple frames, the results are often acceptable for some applications.

Type
Digital Microscopy–What are its Limits?
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Christenson, K. K., Proc. Ann. EMSA Meeting 44(1986)878.Google Scholar