Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-2l2gl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-27T19:23:00.583Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Current Limits in Predicting Eels Fine Structure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

D. A. Muller
Affiliation:
Bell Labs, Lucent Technologies, 600 Mountain Ave, Murray Hill, NJ07974
J. Neaton
Affiliation:
Physics Dept., Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ07974
D. R. Haman
Affiliation:
Bell Labs, Lucent Technologies, 600 Mountain Ave, Murray Hill, NJ07974
Get access

Abstract

Electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS) probes electronic excitations of a solid on the atomic scale. The widespread availability of first-principles calculations has lead to an explosion of theoretical calculations of EELS spectra. Agreement between theory and experiment is generally reported to be good at the typical energy resolutions in commercial microscopes of 0.7-1.3 eV. However a brief survey of the X-ray absorption literature suggests that the anticipated introduction of monochromators, along with improvements in energy stability, and spectrometer resolution will unmask many more effects that cannot be predicted as precisely as they can be measured.

The shape and binding energy of a core excitation is determined by both the ground state electronic structure (initial state effects) and the reponse to the excited electron-hole (final state effects) (Fig. 1). Errors in the initial state, such as the systematic errors in band gaps (and hence band offsets) are inherent in the local density approximation eigenvalues used to simulate EELS spectra.

Type
EELS Microanalysis at High Sensitivity: Advances in Spectrum Imaging, Energy Filtering and Detection (Organized by R. Leapman and J. Bruley)
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References:

1.Hjalmarson, H. P., Buttner, H. P., Dow, J. D., Phys. Rev. B 24, 6010 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Buczko, R., Duscher, G., Pennycook, S. J., Pantelides, S. T., Phys. Rev. Lett 85, 2168 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Neaton, J. B., Muller, D. A., Ashcroft, N. W., Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 12981301 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Weng, X., Rez, P.. Batson, P. E., Sol. Stat. Comm. 74 1013 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Muller, D. A., Ultramicroscopy 78 (1999) 163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Puttner, R., Domke, M. and Kaindl, G., Phys. Rev. A 57 297 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar