Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-pfhbr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T16:00:52.064Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Computer Assisted Morphometry: A Pathologist’s Perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

J.M. Holland*
Affiliation:
Drug Safety Evaluation, Pathology, Allergan Pharmaceutical, PO Box 19534, Irvine, CA, 92623
Get access

Abstract

In spite of improved equipment and software, the routine application of quantitative microscopy to practical problems in drug development has been limited. This is due to a perceived and often real increase in project complexity and time added by quantitation of tissue changes, without an offsetting return of information. A major barrier to quantitative microscopy is the degree of difficulty in collecting data. The more steps in this process, the less attractive the task. Therefore, it follows that the more automated the task, the more likely quantitative methods will be applied. The purpose of this presentation will be to illustrate an approach taken to automate the morphometric quantification of muscle atrophy which follows dennervation.

The traditional morphometric approach to assess myofiber atrophy is based upon laborious planometric measurement of individual muscle fiber cross-sections. Examples of the type of data obtained using the traditional method are shown in text table 1.

Type
Microscopy, Microanalysis and Imaging in the Pharmaceutical Industry (Organized by S. Samuelsson and B. Maleeff)
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Borodic, G.E., Ferrante, R., Bruce, L., et al, Movement Disorders(1994)31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Kakulas, B.A. and Adams, R.D., Diseases of Muscle, Harper & Row, 4ed.(1985),pl34.Google Scholar
3. Image-Pro Plus, version 4.1, Media Cybernetics.Google Scholar