Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-68ccn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T16:29:40.063Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Problem Elements and Spectrometry Problems in X-Ray Microanalysis: the Black Holes of the Periodic Table

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

John T. Armstrong*
Affiliation:
Surface and Microanalysis Science Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, 20899
Get access

Extract

Few quantitative analysis techniques attempt as large an extrapolation between the compositions of standards and samples than is attempted in electron microbeam x-ray emission analysis. In-situ x-ray microanalysis can be performed for essentially all elements in the periodic table in complex matricies that may contain, in extreme cases, thirty or more detectable elements. Analyses are attempted for the same elements, using the same standards, in various matrices whose average atomic numbers might range from 4 to 94. Unlike most analytical techniques, where suites of standards are synthesized having similar bulk compositions as the samples and bracketing the concentrations of the elements of interest, the standards employed in microbeam analysis are most commonly pure elements, simple oxides, or other binary element compounds. This is true even though matrix effects on electron retardation and scattering, x-ray absorption, and secondary x-ray fluorescence can cause major variations in the differences between relative intensity and relative concentration.

Type
Problem Elements and Spectrometry Problems in X-Ray Microanalysis
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Electron Probe Quantitation, Heinrich, K. F. J. and Newbury, D. E., Eds., Plenum Press (1991) 400 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Armstrong, J. T., Microbeam Analysis, 4 (1995) 177.Google Scholar
3.Armstrong, J. T., In: Electron Probe Quantitation, Heinrich, K. F. J. and Newbury, D. E., Eds., Plenum Press (1991) 261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Hovington, P., Drouin, D., and Gauvin, R., Scanning, 19 (1997) 1.Google Scholar
5.Armstrong, J. T., Microscopy and Microanalysis '96, (1996) 45.Google Scholar
6.Armstrong, J. T., Microbeam Analysis, 2 (1993) S25.Google Scholar
7.Armstrong, J. T., Proc. Ann. MAS Meeting 27, (1992) 1656; 1744.Google Scholar