Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-7drxs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T14:47:31.374Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Antioxidants Stimulate Germinal Vesicle Breakdown, But Inhibit Chromosome Formation And Spindle Assembly In Porcine Oocytes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

Qing-Yuan Sun
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, Columbia, MO65211
Randall S. Prather
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Sciences, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, MO65211
Heide Schatten
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, Columbia, MO65211
Get access

Extract

Mammalian oocytes are arrested at the diplotene stage of the first meiotic division. Release of oocytes from their follicles induces meiotic resumption characterized by germinal vesicle breakdown (GVBD), followed by the chromosome formation and metaphase I spindle organization and finally the extrusion the first polar body. Recently it was shown that cellpermeant antioxidants significantly inhibit spontaneous resumption of meiosis in mouse oocytes, which may indicate a role of oxygen radicals in oocyte maturation. The regulation of mouse oocyte meiosis resumption is different from that of large domestic animals in that GVBD is independent of Ca2+ and protein synthesis. The present study investigated the influence of two cell-permeant antioxidants, 2(3)-ter-butyl-4-hydroxyanisole (BHA) and nordihydroguaiaretic acid (NDGA), on porcine oocyte meiosis resumption, chromatin behavior and spindle assembly. Our findings revealed a different role of antioxidants in porcine oocyte meiosis resumption than in mouse oocyte maturation.

Type
Developmental/Reproductive Biology
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References:

1.Takami, M. et al., Am. J. Physiol, 276 (1999) E684.Google Scholar
2.Tombes, R.M. et al., J. Cell Sci., 117 (1992) 799.Google Scholar