Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-4hvwz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-31T01:11:09.797Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Alchemi Analysis of Cation Distributions in Spinel-Structured Compounds Using Oxygen as a Marker Element

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

Ian M. Anderson*
Affiliation:
Metals & Ceramics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, PO Box 2008, Oak Ridge, TN37831
Get access

Extract

The establishment of ALCHEMI (atom location by channeling-enhanced microanalysis) as a viable microanalytical technique owes much to its early success in determining cation distributions in crystals having the structure of the mineral spinel, MgAl2O4. The first application of ALCHEMI was to a synthetic chromite spinel, and geological applications to natural mineral spinels containing multiple 3d transition elements provided many of the early applications of the technique. Spinel has three distinct regular lattice sites, two cation sites and one anion site, occupying the 8a, 16d and 32e Wyckoff positions of the Fd3m space group. In projection along (800), tetrahedrally coordinated (8a) cations occupy one set of alternate planes, whereas octahedrally coordinated (16d) cations and, to a good approximation, the anions occupy the other set. In principle, therefore, ALCHEMI performed at an 800 planar channeling condition could be used to analyze site distributions in spinel, using oxygen as a marker for the planes containing the octahedral cations, as was early noted.

Type
Future of Microscopy: Ceramics, Composites, and Cement
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Spence, J.C.H.and Taftø, J., J. Microsc. 130(1983)147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2. Taftø, J. and Liliental, Z., J. Appl. Cryst. 15(1982)260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

3. Spence, J.C.H., Graham, R.J.and Shindo, D., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 62(1986)153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

4. Self, P.G. and Buseck, P.R., Phil. Mag. A 48(1983)L21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

5. Qian, W.,Tötdal, B., Hoier, R. and Spence, J.C.H., Ultramicrosc. 41(1992)147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

6. Allen, L.J., Josefsson, T.W.and Rossouw, C.J., Ultramicrosc. 55(1994)258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7. Anderson, I.M. and Bentley, J., Proc. Microscopy & Microanalysis (1997)971.Google Scholar

8. Anderson, I.M. and Bentley, J., Proc. Microscopy & Microanalysis (1996)550.Google Scholar

9. Bentley, J. and Anderson, I.M., Proc. Microscopy& Microanalysis (1996)552.Google Scholar

10. Anderson, I.M. and Bentley, J., Proc. ICEM 13 1(1994)609.Google Scholar

11. Research at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory SHaRE User Facility was sponsored by the Division of Materials Sciences, U.S. Department of Energy, under contract DE-AC05-96OR22464 with Lockheed Martin Energy Research Corporation.Google Scholar