Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-25T07:38:50.267Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

SYSTEMATICS AND ENTOMOLOGY: SOME MAJOR THEMES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

H.V. Danks  and
George E. Ball
H.V. Danks
Affiliation:
Biological Survey of Canada (Terrestrial Arthropods), Canadian Museum of Nature, PO Box 3443, Station D, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1P 6P4
George E. Ball
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2E3
Get access

Abstract

Systematics allows the extraordinary diversity of biological systems to be understood, and information about organisms to be organized and made accessible. Key patterns that help to interpret natural processes can be summarized, and biological traits predicted, by determining the relationships of natural taxa. Ecological roles are made visible and existing knowledge is made accessible only through specific names. Most organismic diversity is represented by terrestrial arthropods, but knowledge is very incomplete. Even for species found in Canada, half have not been described and the immature stages of most are unknown.Systematics supports entomology and underpins studies of biology in many different ways. From these roles, understanding is gained about diversity and evolution, distributions and biogeographically significant regions of the country, adaptations as related especially to species interactions and metamorphosis, and the application of systematics information. In addition, the values of basic systematic work, modern techniques, and long-term coordinated efforts in studying the fauna are emphasized.A coordinated study of diversity by systematists in conjunction with ecologists and others is required. Such a coordinated approach is timely given recent recognition that the world depends on self-sustaining but increasingly threatened biological systems. Diverse organisms maintain those systems but can be distinguished only through systematics. Adequate long-term support — for systematics positions, research collections, activities that include the preparation of basic works such as monographs, and educational facilities — is required to underpin the systematics component of such a coordinated study.

Résumé

La systématique permet la compréhension de l'extraordinaire diversité des systèmes biologiques tout en rendant possible l'accessibilité et l'organisation de toutes nos connaissances sur les organismes. La détermination des relations entre les taxons naturels fournit les outils nécessaires à l'interprétation des processus naturels et à la prédiction des caractères biologiques. Les rôles écologiques sont rendus apparents et les données accumulées ne sont rendues accessibles que par la connaissance des noms spécifiques. La plus grande partie de la diversité des organismes est représentée par les arthropodes terrestres, mais nos connaissances à leur sujet sont très incomplètes. La moitié des espèces trouvées au Canada restent encore à décrire et les stades immatures de la plupart des autres ne sont mêmes pas connus.

La systématique sous-tend l'entomologie et sert de substrat aux études biologiques de plusieurs manières. Ces rôles de la systématique jettent de la lumière sur la diversité et l'évolution, sur la répartition et sur les régions d'importance biogéographique du pays, sur les adaptations, en particulier celles qui sont reliées aux interactions entre les espèces et à la métamorphose, enfin sur l'application pratique des informations taxinomiques. De plus, la valeur des travaux de base en systématique, des techniques modernes et des efforts conjugués au cours d'études à long terme est soulignée.

Une étude coordonnée de la diversité par des systématiciens en collaboration avec des écologistes et d'autres spécialistes est indispensable. Une telle approche est bien à propos, puisqu'il est maintenant reconnu que le monde dépend de systèmes biologiques durables qui sont de plus en plus menacés. Des organismes divers maintiennent ces systèmes et ils ne peuvent être reconnus qu'à la lumière de la systématique. Un appui adéquat à long terme — postes de systématiciens, collections de recherche, préparation de travaux de base tels des monographies, installations pédagogiques — est nécessaire à l'établissement de la composante taxinomique d'un tel effort de coordination. [Traduit par la rédaction]

Type
Research Article
Information
The Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada , Volume 125 , Supplement S165 , 1993 , pp. 257 - 272
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acorn, J.H., and Ball, G.E.. 1991. The mandibles of some adult ground beetles: Structure, function, and the evolution of herbivory. Can. J. Zool. 69: 638–650.Google Scholar
Anderson, R.S. 1993. Weevils and plants: Phylogenetic versus ecological mediation of evolution of host plant associations in Curculioninae (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). pp. 197–232 in Ball, G.E., and Danks, H.V. (Eds.), Systematics and Entomology: Diversity, Distribution, Adaptation, and Application. Mem. em. Soc. Can. 165: 272 pp.Google Scholar
Ashe, J.S. 1984. Generic revision of the subtribe Gyrophaenina (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Aleocharinae) with review of the described subgenera and major features of evolution. Quaest. ent. 20: 129–349.Google Scholar
Ball, G.E. 1982. Current notions about systematics and classification of insects. Manitoba Ent. 13 [1979]: 5–18.Google Scholar
Ball, G.E. 1985. Reconstructed phylogeny and geographical history of genera of the tribe Galeritini. pp. 276–321 in Ball, G.E. (Ed.), Taxonomy, Phylogeny and Zoogeography of Beetles and Ants: A Volume Dedicated to the Memory of Philip Jackson Darlington, Jr. (1904–1983). Junk, Dordrecht, Boston, Lancaster. 514 pp.Google Scholar
Ball, G.E., and Danks, H.V.. 1993. Systematics and entomology: Introduction, pp. 3–10 in Ball, G.E., and Danks, H.V. (Eds.), Systematics and Entomology: Diversity, Distribution, Adaptation, and Application. Mem. ent. Soc. Can. 165: 272 pp.Google Scholar
Ball, G.E., Shpeley, D., and Currie, D.C.. 1991. The New World genus Stenomorphus Dejean (Coleoptera: Carabidae: Harpalini): Classification, allometry, and evolutionary considerations. Can. Ent. 123: 933–988.Google Scholar
Behan-Pelletier, V.M. 1993. Diversity of soil arthropods in Canada: Systematic and ecological problems, pp. 11–50 in Ball, G.E., and Danks, H.V. (Eds.), Systematics and Entomology: Diversity, Distribution, Adaptation, and Application. Mem. ent. Soc. Can. 165: 272 pp.Google Scholar
Biological Survey of Canada. 1989. Biological Survey of Canada (Terrestrial Arthropods). Ottawa. Leaflet.Google Scholar
Bird, CD., and Halladay, I.A.R.. 1967. The Cypress Hills, pp. 117–133 in Hardy, W.G. (Ed.), Alberta. A Natural History. M.G. Hurtig Publishers, Edmonton, Alta. 343 pp.Google Scholar
Blackman, R.L., Brown, P.A., and Eastop, V.F.. 1987. Problems in pest aphid taxonomy: Can chromosomes plus morphometrics provide some answers? pp. 233–238 in Holman, J., Pelikan, J., Dixon, A.F.G., and Weismann, L. (Eds.), Population Structure, Genetics and Taxonomy of Aphids and Thysanoptera. (Proc. Int. symp. Smolenice, Czechoslovakia, 1985.) SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague. 542 pp.Google Scholar
Brown, B.V. 1993. Convergent adaptations in Phoridae (Diptera) living in the nests of social insects: A review of the New World Aenigmatiinae. pp. 115–137 in Ball, G.E., and Danks, H.V. (Eds.). Systematics and Entomology: Diversity, Distribution, Adaptation, and Application. Mem. ent. Soc. Can. 165: 272 pp.Google Scholar
Callahan, J.T. 1984. Long-term ecological research. Bioscience 34: 363–367.Google Scholar
Chernoff, B. 1986. Systematics and long-range ecological research, pp. 29–44 in Kim, K.C., and Knutson, L. (Eds.). Foundations for a National Biological Survey. Association of Systematics Collections, Lawrence, KS. 215 pp.Google Scholar
Chiasson, H. 1986. A synopsis of the Thysanoptera (thrips) of Canada. Macdonald College, McGill University, Lyman ent. Mus. & Res. Lab. Memoir 17: 153 pp.Google Scholar
Cohn, J.P. 1989. Gauging the biological impacts of the greenhouse effect. Bioscience 39: 142–146.Google Scholar
Collins, M., and Wells, S.. 1983. Invertebrates — who needs them? New Scientist 98: 441–444.Google Scholar
Danks, H.V. (Ed.). 1979. Canada and its Insect Fauna. Mem. em. Soc. Can. 108: 573 pp.Google Scholar
Danks, H.V. (Ed.). 1981. Arctic Arthropods. A review of systematics and ecology with particular reference to the North American fauna. Entomological Society of Canada, Ottawa. Ont. 608 pp.Google Scholar
Danks, H.V. (Ed.). 1986. Biological Survey of Canada (Terrestrial Arthropods), pp. 203–208 in Kim, K.C.. and Knutson, L. (Eds.), Foundations for a National Biological Survey. Association of Systematics Collections, Lawrence. KS. 215 pp.Google Scholar
Danks, H.V. (Ed.). 1988 a. Systematics in support of Entomology. A. Rev. Ent. 33: 271–296.Google Scholar
Danks, H.V. (Ed.). 1988 b. Insects of Canada. Biological Survey of Canada (Terrestrial Arthropods). Ottawa, Ont. (Biol. Surv. Can. Doc. Ser. no. I.) 18 pp.Google Scholar
Danks, H.V. (Ed.). 1991. Museum collections: Fundamental values and modern problems. Collection Forum 7: 95–111.Google Scholar
Danks, H.V. (Ed.). 1992. Arctic insects as indicators of environmental change. Arctic 45: 159–166.Google Scholar
Danks, H.V. (Ed.). 1993. Patterns of diversity in the Canadian insect fauna, pp. 51–74 in Ball, G.E., and Danks, H. V. (Eds.), Systematics and Entomology: Diversity, Distribution, Adaptation, and Application. Mem. ent. Soc. Can. 165: 272 pp.Google Scholar
Danks, H.V., and Foottit, R.G.. 1989. Insects of the boreal zone of Canada. Can. Ent. 121: 625–690.Google Scholar
Danks, H.V., and Ring, R.A.. 1989. Arctic Invertebrate Biology: Action Required. A brief prepared by the Biological Survey of Canada (Terrestrial Arthropods). Bull. ent. Soc. Can. 21(3): Suppl. 7 pp.Google Scholar
Danks, H.V., Wiggins, G.B., and Rosenberg, D.M.. 1987. Ecological collections and long-term monitoring. Bull. ent. Soc. Can. 19(1): 16–18.Google Scholar
Darlington, P.J. Jr., 1943. Carabidae of mountains and islands: Data on the evolution of isolated faunas and on atrophy of wings. Ecol. Monogr. 13: 37–61.Google Scholar
Darlington, P.J. Jr., 1959. Darwin and Zoogeography. Proc. Am. Phil. Soc. 103: 307–319.Google Scholar
Darlington, P.J. Jr., 1980. Evolution for Naturalists: The Simple Principles and Complex Reality. Wiley, New York. etc. 262 pp.Google Scholar
de Moraes, G.J. 1987. Importance of taxonomy in biological control. Insect Sci. Appl. 8: 841–844.Google Scholar
Downes, J.A. 1973. Biting flies: The necessity for a new systematics. pp. 115–123 in Hudson, A. (Ed.), Biting Fly Control and Environmental Quality. (Proc.Symp. Univ. Alta., Edmonton, 1972.) Def. Res. Bd. Canada, Ottawa, Ont.162 pp.Google Scholar
Edwards, R.Y. 1985. Research: A museum cornerstone, pp. 1–11 in Miller, E.H. (Ed.), Museum Collections: Their Roles and Future in Biological Research. Br. Columbia Prow Mus. Occ. Pap. Ser. 25: 221 pp.Google Scholar
Eickwort, G.C. 1981. Aspects of the nesting biology of five nearctic species of Agapostemon (Hymenoptera: Halictidae). J. Kans. ent. Soc. 54: 337–351.Google Scholar
Elton, C., and Miller, R.S.. 1954. The ecological survey of animal communities with a practical system of classifying habitats by structural characters. J. Ecol. 42: 460–496.Google Scholar
Erwin, T.L. 1979. Thoughts on the evolutionary history of ground beetles: Hypotheses generated from comparative faunal analyses of lowland forest sites in temperate and tropical regions (Coleoptera: Carabidae). pp. 539–592 in Erwin, T.L., Ball, G.E., Whitehead, D.R., and Halpern, A.L. (Eds.), Carabid Beetles: Their Evolution, Natural History and Classification. (Prov. 1st Int. Symp. of Carabidology, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C., August 21, 23, and 25, 1976.) Junk, The Hague. 644 pp.Google Scholar
Erwin, T.L. 1983. Beetles and other insects of tropical forest canopies at Manaus, Brazil, sampled by insecticidal fogging, pp. 59–75 in Sutton, S.L., Whitmore, T.C., and Chadwick, A.C. (Eds.), Tropical Rain Forest: Ecology and Management. Blackwell, Oxford. 498 pp.Google Scholar
Erwin, T.L. 1985. The taxon pulse: A general pattern of lineage radiation and extinction among carabid beetles, pp. 437–493 in Ball, G.E. (Ed.), Taxonomy, Phylogeny and Zoogeography of Beetles and Ants: A Volume Dedicated to the Memory of Philip Jackson Darlington, Jr. (1904–1983). Junk, Dordrecht, Boston, Lancaster. 514 pp.Google Scholar
Erwin, T.L. 1991. An evolutionary basis for conservation strategies. Science 253: 750–752.Google Scholar
Fairchild, W.L., O'Neill, M.C.A., and Rosenberg, D.M.. 1987. Quantitative evaluation of the behavioral extraction of aquatic invertebrates from samples of sphagnum moss. J. N. Am. benthol. Soc. 6: 281–287.Google Scholar
Finnamore, A.T. 1988. Peatland hymenoptera of Bistcho lake, Alberta: A faunal comparison of a subarctic peatland to a mid-boreal continental peatland in Alberta, pp. 39–68 in McGillivray, W.B., and Hastings, R.I. (Eds.), Natural History of the Bistcho Lake Region, Northwest Alberta. Prov. Mus. Alberta Nat. Hist. Occ. Pap. 10: 106 pp.Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, J.W. 1985. The role of scientific collections in ecological morphology, pp. 195–207 in Miller, E.H. (Ed.), Museum Collections: Their Roles and Future in Biological Research. Br. Columbia Prov. Mus. Occ. Pap. Ser. 25: 221 pp.Google Scholar
Frania, H.E. 1991. Displacement of one taxon by another as the cause of certain ecological shifts in Eustilicus Sharp (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae): A test of the evidence. Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 93: 437–448.Google Scholar
Franklin, J.F., Bledsoe, C.S., and Callahan, J.T.. 1990. Contribution of the Long-term Ecological Research Program. Bioscience 40: 509–523.Google Scholar
Gibson, G.A.P. 1986. Mesothoracic skeletomusculature and mechanics of flight and jumping in Eupelminae (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea: Eupelmidae). Can. Ent. 118: 691–728.Google Scholar
Gibson, G.A.P. 1993. Groundplan structure and homology of the pleuron in Hymenoptera based on the skelotomusculature of Xyelidae (Hymenoptera) and Raphidiidae (Neuroptera). pp. 165–187 in Ball, G.E., and Danks, H.V. (Eds.), Systematics and Entomology: Diversity, Distribution, Adaptation, and Application. Mem. ent. Soc. Can. 165: 272 pp.Google Scholar
Greenslade, J. 1984. Invertebrates and environmental assessment. Environment and Planning 3: 13–15.Google Scholar
Greenwood, S.R. 1987. The role of insects in tropical forest food webs. Ambio 26: 267–271.Google Scholar
Hamilton, K.G.A. 1982. The spittlebugs of Canada (Homoptera: Cercopidae). The insects and arachnids of Canada, Part 10. Agric. Can. Publ. 1740: 102 pp.Google Scholar
Harper, P.P., and Cloutier, L.. 1993. Systematics and the synecology of aquatic insects: Phenology and temporal structure of temperate lake assemblages, pp. 243–256 in Ball, G.E., and Danks, H.V. (Eds.), Systematics and Entomology: Diversity, Distribution, Adaptation, and Application. Mem. ent. Soc. Can. 165: 272 pp.Google Scholar
Hennig, W. 1966. Phylogenetic Systematics. Univ. Illinois Press, Urbana, IL. 263 pp.Google Scholar
Holloway, J.D. 1983. Insect surveys: An approach to environmental monitoring, pp. 239–261 in Atti XII Congresso Nazionalc Italiano di Entomologia, Roma, 5–9 November, 1980. Vol. 1. Academia Nazionale Italiana di Entomologia, Roma (Italy).Google Scholar
Humphries, C.J., and Parenti, L.R.. 1986. Cladistic Biogeography. Oxford Monogr. in biogeography, No. 2. Clarendon Press, Oxford. 98 pp.Google Scholar
Janzen, D.H. 1988. Ecological characterization of a Costa Rican dry forest caterpillar fauna. Biotropica 20: 120–135.Google Scholar
Kavanaugh, D.H. 1985. On wing atrophy in carabid beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae), with special reference to Nearctic Nebria. pp. 408–431 in Ball, G.E. (Ed.), Taxonomy, Phylogeny and Zoogeography of Beetles and Ants: A Volume Dedicated to the Memory of Philip Jackson Darlington, Jr. (1904–1983). Junk, Dordrecht, Boston, Lancaster. 514 pp.Google Scholar
Kevan, D.K. McE., and Scudder, G.G.E.. 1989. Illustrated Keys to the Families of Terrestrial Arthropods of Canada. I. Myriapods (millipedes, centipedes, etc.). Biological Survey of Canada (Terrestrial Arthropods), Ottawa, Ont. (Biol. Surv. Tax. Ser. no. 1.) 88 pp.Google Scholar
Kosztarab, M., and Schaefer, C.W. (Eds.). 1990 a. Systematics of the North American Insects and Arachnids: Status and Needs. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA. Info. Ser. 90–1: 247 pp.Google Scholar
Kosztarab, M., and Schaefer, C.W. (Eds.). 1990 b. Conclusions, pp. 241–247 in Kosztarab, M., and Schaefer, C.W. (Eds.). Systematics of the North American Insects and Arachnids: Status and Needs. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA. Info. Ser. 90–1: 247 pp.Google Scholar
Kozar, F., Humble, L.M., Foottit, R.G., and Otvos, I.S.. 1989. New and little known scale insects (Homoptera: Coccoidea) from British Columbia. J. ent. Soc. Br. Columbia 86: 70–77.Google Scholar
Lafontaine, J.D. 1993. Cutworm systematics: Confusions and solutions, pp. 189–196 in Ball, G.E., and Danks, H.V. (Eds.), Systematics and Entomology: Diversity, Distribution, Adaptation, and Application. Mem. ent. Soc. Can. 165: 272 pp.Google Scholar
Lande, R. 1988. Genetics and demography in biological conservation. Science 241: 1455–1460.Google Scholar
Larson, D.J., and Colbo, M.H.. 1983. The aquatic insects: biogeographic considerations, pp. 593–677 in South, G.R. (Ed.), Biogeography and Ecology of the Island of Newfoundland. Junk, The Hague. 723 pp.Google Scholar
Laverty, T.M., and Harder, L.D.. 1988. The bumble bees of eastern Canada. Can. Ent. 120: 965–987.Google Scholar
Lindquist, E.E., Ainscough, B.D., Clulow, F.V., Funk, R.C., Marshall, V.G., Nesbitt, H.H.J., OConnor, B.M., Smith, I.M., and Wilkinson, P.R.. 1979. Acari. pp. 252–289 in Danks, H.V. (Ed.), Canada and its Insect Fauna. Mem. ent. Soc. Can. 108: 573 pp.Google Scholar
Lovejoy, T.E. 1977. Conservation: Can systematics provide the answer? Assoc. Syst. Collns Newsletter 5: 4–5.Google Scholar
Mackay, R.J., and Wiggins, G.B.. 1979. Ecological diversity in Trichoptera. A. Rev. Ent. 24: 185–208.Google Scholar
Mackay, W.P., and Vinson, S.B.. 1989. A Guide to Species Identification of New World Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Sociobiology 16(1): 47 pp.Google Scholar
Marshall, V.G., Reeves, R.M., and Norton, R.A.. 1987. Catalogue of the Oribatida (Acari) of Continental United States and Canada. Mem. ent. Soc. Can. 139: 418 pp.Google Scholar
Matthews, J.V. Jr., 1979. Tertiary and quaternary environments: Historical background for an analysis of the Canadian insect fauna, pp. 31–86 in Danks, H.V. (Ed.), Canada and its Insect Fauna. Mem. ent. Soc. Can. 108: 573 pp.Google Scholar
May, R.M. 1988. How many species are there on earth? Science 241: 1441–1449.Google Scholar
Menken, S.B.J. 1989. Electrophoretic studies on geographic populations, host races, and sibling species of insect pests, pp. 181–202 in Loxdale, H.D., and den Hollander, J. (Eds.), Electrophoretic Studies on Agricultural Pests. Systematics Association Special Series, Vol. 39. Oxford University Press, Oxford. 386 pp.Google Scholar
Mitter, C., Farrell, B., and Wiegmann, B.. 1988. The phylogenetic study of adaptive zones: Has phytophagy promoted insect diversification? Am. Nat. 132: 107–128.Google Scholar
Möller-Andersen, N. 1991. Cladistic biogeography of marine water striders (Insecta, Hemiptera) in the Indo-Pacific. Austr. syst. Bot. 4: 151–163.Google Scholar
Noonan, G.R. 1988. Faunal relationships between eastern North America and Europe, as shown by insects, pp. 39–53 in Downes, J.A., and Kavanaugh, D.H. (Eds.), Origins of the North American Insect Fauna. Mem. ent. Soc. Can. 144: 168 pp.Google Scholar
Oliver, D.R. 1971. Life history of Chironomidae. A. Rev. Ent. 16: 211–230.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, D.M., and Danks, H.V. (Eds.). 1987. Aquatic Insects of Peatlands and Marshes in Canada. Mem. ent. Soc. Can. 140: 174 pp.Google Scholar
Rothfels, K.H. 1979. Cytotaxonomy of blackflies (Simuliidae). A. Rev. Ent. 24: 507–539.Google Scholar
Rozen, J.G. 1958. Monographic Study of the Genus Nomadopsis Ashmead (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae). Univ. Calif. Publs Ent. 15: 202 pp.Google Scholar
Schindler, D.W. 1989. Biotic impoverishment at home and abroad. Bioscience 39: 426.Google Scholar
Schmitt, M. 1989. Claims and limits of phylogenetic systematics. Z. zool. Syst. Evolut. -forsch. 27(2): 181–190.Google Scholar
Scudder, G.G.E. 1979. Present patterns in the fauna and flora of Canada, pp. 87–179 in Danks, H.V. (Ed.), Canada and its Insect Fauna. Mem. ent. Soc. Can. 108: 573 pp.Google Scholar
Scudder, G.G.E. 1993. Geographic distribution and biogeography of representative species of xeric grassland-adapted Nearctic Lygaeidae in western North America (Insecta: Heteroptera). pp. 75–113 in Ball, G.E., and Danks, H.V. (Eds.), Systematics and Entomology: Diversity, Distribution, Adaptation, and Application. Mem. ent. Soc. Can. 165: 272 pp.Google Scholar
Scudder, G.G.E., and Gessler, N. (Eds.). 1990. The Outer Shores. Queen Charlotte Islands Museum Press, Vancouver, B.C.327 pp.Google Scholar
Shorthouse, J.D. 1993. Adaptations of gall wasps of the genus Diplolepis (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae) and the role of gall anatomy in cynipid systematics. pp. 139–163 in Ball, G.E., and Danks, H.V. (Eds.), Systematics and Entomology: Diversity, Distribution, Adaptation, and Application. Mem. ent. Soc. Can. 165: 272 pp.Google Scholar
Shotton, F.W. 1965. Movements of insect populations in the British Pleistocene. Geol. Soc. Am. spec. Pap. 84: 17–33.Google Scholar
Singh, S.M., and Cunningham, T.K.. 1981. Morphological and genetic differentiation in aphids (Aphididae). Can. Ent. 113: 539–550.Google Scholar
Smetana, A. 1988. Review of the family Hydrophilidae of Canada and Alaska (Coleoptera). Mem. ent. Soc. Can. 142: 316 pp.Google Scholar
Smith, I.M. 1987. Water mites of peatlands and marshes in Canada, pp. 31–46 in Rosenberg, D.M., and Danks, H.V. (Eds.), Aquatic Insects of Peatlands and Marshes in Canada. Mem. ent. Soc. Can. 140: 174 pp.Google Scholar
[Spence, J.R. (Ed.)]. 1986. Faunal influences on soil structure. Quaest. ent. 21: 371.1–700 [1985].Google Scholar
Spence, J.R., and Spence, D.H.. 1988. Of ground beetles and men: Introduced species and the synanthropic fauna of western Canada, pp. 151–168 in Downes, J.A., and Kavanaugh, D.H. (Eds.), Origins of the North American Insect Fauna. Mem. ent. Soc. Can. 144: 168 pp.Google Scholar
Sperling, F.A.H. 1987. Evolution of the Papilio machaon species group in western Canada (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae). Quaest. ent. 23: 199–315.Google Scholar
Sperling, F.A.H. 1993. Mitochondrial DNA phylogeny of the Papilio machaon species group (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae). pp. 233–242 in Ball, G.E., and Danks, H.V. (Eds.), Systematics and Entomology: Diversity, Distribution, Adaptation, and Application. Mem. ent. Soc. Can. 165: 272 pp.Google Scholar
Stanton, N.L., and Lattin, J.D.. 1989. In defense of species. Bioscience 39: 67.Google Scholar
Stork, N.E. 1988. Insect diversity: Facts, fiction and speculation. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 35: 321–337.Google Scholar
Vockeroth, J.R. 1954. Notes on the identities and distributions of Aedes species of northern Canada, with a key to the females (Diptera: Culicidae). Can. Ent. 86: 241–255.Google Scholar
Wheeler, Q.D. 1989. Militant view of needs and priorities for training systematic biologists. Assoc. Syst. Collns Newsletter 17: 45–46, 50–52.Google Scholar
Wiggins, G.B. 1977. Larvae of the North American Caddisfly Genera (Trichoptera). Univ. Toronto Press, Toronto, Ont.401 pp.Google Scholar
Wiggins, G.B. 1983. Entomology and society. Bull. ent. Soc. Am. 29: 27–29.Google Scholar
Wiggins, G.B., Marshall, S.A., and Downes, J.A.. 1991. The Importance of Research Collections of Terrestrial Arthropods. A brief prepared by the Biological Survey of Canada (Terrestrial Arthropods). Bull. ent. Soc. Can. 23(2): Suppl. 16 pp.Google Scholar
Williams, D.D., and Danks, H.V. (Eds.). 1991. Arthropods of Springs, with Particular Reference to Canada. Mem. ent. Soc. Can. 155: 217 pp.Google Scholar
Wilson, E.O. 1961. The nature of the taxon cycle in the Melanesian ant fauna. Am. Nat. 95: 169–193.Google Scholar
Wilson, E.O. 1985. The biological diversity crisis: A challenge to science. Issues in Science and Technology (Fall 1985): 20–29.Google Scholar
Wilson, E.O., and Peter, F.M. (Eds.). 1988. Biodiversity. National Academy Press, Washington, DC. 521 pp.Google Scholar