Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T04:38:39.303Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

PRIMARY TYPES OF ICHNEUMONIDAE (HYMENOPTERA) IN THE CANADIAN NATIONAL COLLECTION

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Get access

Abstract

Eight hundred and seventy-six primary types of Ichneumonidae housed in the Canadian National Collection were examined and listed. These were contributed by the following authors: Viereck (248), Dasch (174), Heinrich (102), Walley (97), Townes (54), Provancher (51), Mason (25), Harrington (21), Sanborne (21), Loan (15), Barron (11), Porter (9), Gupta (6), Hopper (6), Gauld and Mitchell (5), Townes and Chiu (5), Brues (3), Cushman (3), Gupta and Gupta (3), Kamath and Gupta (3), Gupta and Jonathan (2), Townes and Gupta (2), Baltazar (1), Barron and Bisdee (1), Barron and Walley (1), Cresson (1), Curtis (1), Mitchell (1), Pratt (1), Slobodchikoff (1), Torgersen (1), and Walley and Barron (1).

Résumé

Nous avons étudié et noté 876 types primaires de Ichneumonidae de la Collection Nationale du Canada. Ils furent présentés par les auteurs suivants : Viereck (248), Dasch (174), Heinrich (102), Walley (97), Townes (54), Provancher (51), Mason (25), Harrington (21), Sanborne (21), Loan (15), Barron (11), Porter (9), Gupta (6), Hopper (6), Gauld et Mitchell (5), Townes et Chiu (5), Brues (3), Cushman (3), Gupta et Gupta (3), Kamath et Gupta (3), Gupta et Jonathan (2), Townes et Gupta (2), Baltazar (1), Barron et Bisdee (1), Barron et Walley (1), Cresson (1), Curtis (1), Mitchell (1), Pratt (1), Slobodchikoff (1), Torgersen (1) et Walley et Barron (1).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ashmead, W.H. 1890 a. Descriptions of new Ichneumonidae in the collection of the U.S. National Museum. Proc. U.S. natn. Mus. 12: 387451.Google Scholar
Ashmead, W.H. 1890 b. On the Hymenoptera of Colorado. Colo. Biol. Assoc. Bull. 1: 146.Google Scholar
Ashmead, W.H. 1896. Descriptions of new parasitic Hymenoptera. Trans. Am. ent. Soc. 23: 179234.Google Scholar
Ashmead, W.H. 1902. Papers from the Harriman Alaska expedition. XXVIII. Hymenoptera. Proc. Wash. Acad. Sci. 4: 117274.Google Scholar
Baltazar, C.R. 1964. Eriostethus Morley and a new polysphinctine genus (Ichneumonidae, Hymenoptera). Pacif. Insects 6: 388401.Google Scholar
Barron, J.R. 1975. Provancher's collections of insects, particularly those of Hymenoptera, and a study of the types of his species of Ichneumonidae. Naturaliste can. 102: 387591.Google Scholar
Barron, J.R. 1981. The Nearctic species of Ctenopelma (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae, Ctenopelmatinae). Naturaliste can. 108: 1756.Google Scholar
Barron, J.R., and Bisdee, H.E.. 1977. Adults and larvae of a new species of Gelis (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae) parasitizing eggs of Schizocosa saltatrix (Araneida, Lycosidae). J. N.Y. ent. Soc. 85: 4348.Google Scholar
Barron, J.R., and Walley, G.S.. 1983. Revision of the Holarctic genus Pyracmon (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae). Can. Ent. 115: 227241.Google Scholar
Brischke, C.G. 1871. Die Hymenopteren der Provinz Preussen. Schr. phys.-okon. Ges. konigsb. 11: 65106.Google Scholar
Brischke, C.G. 1880. Die Ichneumoniden der Provinzen West- und Ost-Preussen. Schr. naturf. Ges. Danzig 4: 108210.Google Scholar
Brues, C.T. 1919. The parasitic Hymenoptera collected by the Canadian Arctic Expedition, 1913–18. Rep. Can. arct. Exped. 1913–18, V. 3G: 2124.Google Scholar
Carlson, R.W. 1979. Family Ichneumonidae, pp. 315740. In Krombein, K.V., Hurd, P.D. Jr., Smith, D.R., and Burks, B.D. (Eds.), Catalog of Hymenoptera in America North of Mexico. V. 1, Symphyta and Apocrita (Parasitica), Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Cresson, E.T. 1864. Descriptions of North American Hymenoptera, in the Collection of the Entomological Society of Philadelphia. Proc. ent. Soc. Philad. 3: 131196, 257–321.Google Scholar
Cresson, E.T. 1865 a. Catalogue of Hymenoptera in the Collection of the Entomological Society of Philadelphia, from Colorado Territory. Proc. ent. Soc. Philad. 4: 242313.Google Scholar
Cresson, E.T. 1865 b. On the Hymenoptera of Cuba. Proc. ent. Soc. Philad. 4: 1200.Google Scholar
Cresson, E.T. 1867. A list of the Ichneumonidae of North America, with descriptions of new species. Trans. Am. ent. Soc. 1: 289312.Google Scholar
Cresson, E.T. 1868. A list of the Ichenumonidae of North America, with descriptions of new species. Trans. Am. ent. Soc. 2: 89114.Google Scholar
Cresson, E.T. 1870. Descriptions of new species belonging to the sub-family Pimplariae found in America north of Mexico. Trans. Am. ent. Soc. 3: 143172.Google Scholar
Cresson, E.T. 1872 a. Hymenoptera Texana. Trans. Am. ent. Soc. 4: 153292.Google Scholar
Cresson, E.T. 1872 b. Descriptions of North American Hymenoptera, No. 2. Can. Ent. 4: 6164.Google Scholar
Cresson, E.T. 1877. Notes on the species belonging to the subfamily Ichneumonides, found in America north of Mexico. Trans. Am. ent. Soc. 6: 129212.Google Scholar
Cresson, E.T. 1878. Descriptions of new Ichneumonidae. Can. Ent. 10: 205210.Google Scholar
Cresson, E.T. 1879 (1878). Descriptions of Ichneumonidae chiefly from the Pacific slope of the United States and British North America. Proc. Acad. nat. Sci. Philad. 30: 348381.Google Scholar
Cushman, R.A. 1920. North American Ichneumon-flies, new and described, with taxonomic and nomenclatorial notes. Proc. U.S. natn. Mus. 58: 251292.Google Scholar
Cushman, R.A. 1924. On the Genera of the Ichneumon-flies of the tribe Paniscini Ashmead, with descriptions and discussion of related genera and species. Proc. U.S. natn. Mus. 64: 148.Google Scholar
Cushman, R.A. 1930. A revision of the North American species of Ichneumon-flies of the genus Odontomerus. Proc. U.S. natn. Mus. 77: 115.Google Scholar
Cushman, R.A. 1939. New Ichneumon-flies parasitic on the hemlock sawfly (Neodiprion tsugae Middleton). J. Wash. Acad. Sci. 29: 391402.Google Scholar
Cushman, R.A. 1940. A review of the parasitic wasps of the Ichneumonid genus Exenterus Hartig. Misc. Publs U.S. Dep. Agric. 354: 114.Google Scholar
Cushman, R.A. 1943. Further notes on Exenterus (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae). Can. Ent. 75: 169174.Google Scholar
Cushman, R.A. and Rohwer, S.A.. 1920. The North American Ichneumon-flies of the tribe Acoenitini. Proc. U.S. natn. Mus. 57: 503523.Google Scholar
Dalla Torre, C.G. 1901, 1902. Catalogus Hymenopterorum hucusque descriptorum systematicus et synonymicus. Cat. Hym. 3: 11141.Google Scholar
Dasch, C.E. 1964 a. Ichneumon-flies of America North of Mexico: 5. Subfamily Diplazontinae. Mem. Am. ent. Inst. 3: 1304.Google Scholar
Dasch, C.E. 1964 a. The Neotropic Diplazontinae (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae). Contr. Am. ent. Inst. 1: 177.Google Scholar
Dasch, C.E. 1971. Ichneumon-flies of America North of Mexico: 6. Subfamily Mesochorinae. Mem. Am. ent. Inst. 16: 1376.Google Scholar
Dasch, C.E. 1974. Neotropic Mesochorinae (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae). Mem. Am. ent. Inst. 22: 1509.Google Scholar
Dasch, C.E. 1979. Ichneumon-flies of America North of Mexico: 8. Subfamily Cremastinae. Mem. Am. ent. Inst. 29: 1702.Google Scholar
Davis, G.C. 1897. Descriptions of new species of Trigonalidae, Stephanidae and Ichneumonidae. Trans. Am. ent. Soc. 24: 349372.Google Scholar
Dimmock, G., and Ashmead, W.H.. 1898. Notes on parasitic Hymenoptera, with descriptions of some new species. Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 4: 148173.Google Scholar
Fabricius, J.C. 1798. Joh. Christ. Fabricii supplementum entomologiae systematicae. Hafniae: Apud Proft et Storch, 1798. 572 pp.Google Scholar
Fabricius, J.C. 1804. Systema Piezatorum: secundum ordines, genera, species, adiectis synonymis, locis, observationibus, descriptionibus. Ioh. Christ. Fabricii. Brunsvigae: Carolum Reichard, 1804. 439, 30 pp.Google Scholar
Fiske, W.F. 1903. A study of the parasites of the American tent caterpillar. Tech. Bull. NewHamps. agricx. Exp. Stn 6: 184230.Google Scholar
Ganan, A.B., and Rohwer, S.A.. 19171918. Lectotypes of the species of Hymenoptera (except Apoidea) described by Abbé Provancher. Can. Ent. (1917), 49: 298308, 331–336, 391–400, 427–433; (1918), 50: 28–33, 101–106, 133–137, 166–171, 196–201.Google Scholar
Gauld, I.D., and Mitchell, P.A.. 1981. The taxonomy, distribution and host preferences of Indo-Papuan parasitic wasps of the subfamily Ophioninae (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae). Commonwealth Institute of Entomology, Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux Farnham Royal Slough SL2 3BN, UK. 611 pp.Google Scholar
Gravenhorst, I.L.C. 1829 a. Ichneumonologia Europaea. Ichn. Europaea 3: 11097.Google Scholar
Gravenhorst, I.L.C. 1829 b. Ichneumonologia Europaea. Ichn. Europaea 2: 1989.Google Scholar
Gupta, S., and Gupta, V.. 1983. Ichneumonologia Orientalis Part IX The Tribe Gabuniini (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae). Orient. Insects. Monogr. No. 10. 313 pp.Google Scholar
Gupta, V.K. 1960. A revision of the Oriental species of the genus Zaglyptus (Hymenoptera: Ichenumonidae). Indian J. Ent. 22: 244257.Google Scholar
Gupta, V.K. 1962. Taxonomy, zoogeography, and evolution of Indo-Australian Theronia (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae). Pacif. Insects Monogr. 4: 1142.Google Scholar
Gupta, V.K. 1979. Oriental species of Klutiana (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae). Orient. Insects 13: 323339.Google Scholar
Gupta, V.K. 1980. A revision of the tribe Poemeniini in the Oriental Region (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae). Orient. Insects 14: 73130.Google Scholar
Gupta, V.K., and Jonathan, J.K., J.K., 1969. Oriental species of Coesula Cameron (Hymenoptera: Ichenumonidae). Orient. Insects 2: 155193.Google Scholar
Harrington, W.H. 1891. Two new species of Canadian Pimplinae. Can. Ent. 23: 132135.Google Scholar
Harrington, W.H. 1892. Canadian Hymenoptera — No. 1. Can. Ent. 24: 9899.Google Scholar
Harrington, W.H. 1893. Canadian Hymenoptera — No. 2. Can. Ent. 25: 2932.Google Scholar
Harrington, W.H. 1894 a. Canadian Hymenoptera — No. 5. Can. Ent. 26: 209214.Google Scholar
Harrington, W.H. 1894 b. Canadian Hymenoptera — No. 6. Can. Ent. 26: 245250.Google Scholar
Harrington, W.H. 1896. Canadian Hymenoptera — No. 7. Can. Ent. 28: 7580.Google Scholar
Heinrich, G.H. 1956 a. A report on some North American Arctic and Subarctic Ichneumoninae. Can. Ent. 88: 477487.Google Scholar
Heinrich, G.H. 1956 b. Holarctic elements among the Ichneumoninae of Canada. Can. Ent. 88: 647652.Google Scholar
Heinrich, G.H. 1956 c. Ichneumon lariae Curtis a critical study on this Arctic species and its closely related forms. Can. Ent. 88: 686691.Google Scholar
Heinrich, G.H. 1957. A new species of the tribe Trogini (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae). Can. Ent. 89: 334.Google Scholar
Heinrich, G.H. 1958. A report on some North American Arctic and Subarctic Ichneumoninae first supplement. Can. Ent. 90: 739741.Google Scholar
Heinrich, G.H. 1961 a. Synopsis of Nearctic Ichneumoninae Stenopneusticae with particular reference to the north-eastern region (Hymenoptera) part 1. (1960). Can. Ent. Suppl. 15, pp. 187.Google Scholar
Heinrich, G.H. 1961 a. Synopsis of Nearctic Ichneumoninae Stenopneusticae with particular reference to the north-eastern region (Hymenoptera) part 2. (1960). Can. Ent. Suppl. 18, pp. 88205.Google Scholar
Heinrich, G.H. 1961 c. Synopsis of Nearctic Ichneumoninae Stenopneusticae with particular reference to the north-eastern region (Hymenoptera) part 3. Can. Ent. Suppl. 21, pp. 207368.Google Scholar
Heinrich, G.H. 1961 d. Synopsis of Nearctic Ichneumoninae Stenopneusticae with particular reference to the north-eastern region (Hymenoptera) part 4. Can. Ent. Suppl. 23, pp. 369505.Google Scholar
Heinrich, G.H. 1962 a. Synopsis of Nearctic Ichneumoninae Stenopneusticae with particular reference to the north-eastern region (Hymenoptera) part 5. Can. Ent. Suppl. 26, pp. 507671.Google Scholar
Heinrich, G.H. 1962 b. Synopsis of Nearctic Ichneumoninae Stenopneusticae with particular reference to the north-eastern region (Hymenoptera) part 6. Can. Ent. Suppl. 27, pp. 675802.Google Scholar
Heinrich, G.H. 1962 c. Synopsis of Nearctic Ichneumoninae Stenopneusticae with particular reference to the north-eastern region (Hymenoptera) part 7. Can. Ent. Suppl. 29, pp. 803886.Google Scholar
Heinrich, G.H. 1967. Synopsis and reclassification of the Ichneumoninae Stenopneusticae of Africa south of the Sahara (Hymenoptera). Farmington State College Press, printed in West Germany: Gebr. V. 2: 253480.Google Scholar
Heinrich, G.H. 1969. Synopsis and reclassification of the Ichneumoninae Stenopneusticae of Africa south of the Sahara (Hymenoptera). Farmington State College Press, printed in West Germany: Gebr. V. 5: 9451258. (1968).Google Scholar
Heinrich, G.H. 1975. Synopsis of Nearctic Ichneumoninae Stenopneusticae with particular reference to the North-eastern Region (Hymenoptera). Supplement 5: Ichneumoninae of the Island of Newfoundland. Naturaliste can. 102: 753782.Google Scholar
Holmgren, A.E. 1858 (1856). K. svenska VetenskAkad. Handl. 1: (369, 370).Google Scholar
Holmgren, A.E. 1859 (1858). Ofvers. K. VetenskAkad. Forh. 15: (327).Google Scholar
Holmgren, A.E. 1859. Conspectus generum Pimplariarum Sueciae. Ofvers. K. VetenskAkad. Forh. 16: 121132.Google Scholar
Holmgren, A.E. 1864. Ichneumonologia Suecica. Ichn. Suec. 1: 1213.Google Scholar
Hopper, H.P. 1939. A synoptical revision of the tribe Trogini Ashmead of the United States and Canada (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae). Trans. Am. ent. Soc. 65: 307346.Google Scholar
Hopper, H.P. 1981. A revision of the genus Aphanistes of America north of Mexico (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae). Contr. Am. ent. Inst. 18: 156.Google Scholar
Kamath, M.K., and Gupta, V.K.. 1972. Ichneumonologia Orientalis or a monographic study of Oriental Ichneumonidae. Part II. The tribe Rhyssini (Hymenoptera: Ichenumonidae). The association for the study of Oriental insects, c/o Department of Zoology, University of Delhi, Delhi — 7, India.Google Scholar
Kriechbaumer, J. 1880. Brachycyrtus (brachys kurz; kyrtos buckelig.), novum genus Cryptidarum. Zool. — Min. Ver. Regensburg, Corresp. — Bl. 34: 161164.Google Scholar
Krombein, K.V., et al. 1958. Hymenoptera of America north of Mexico: synoptic catalog. Agric. Monogr. U.S. Dept. Agric. 2 (Suppl. 1). pp. 1305.Google Scholar
LeConte, J.L. 1859. The complete writings of Thomas Say on the entomology of North America. Say Ent. (Am. Ent.) 1: 1412.Google Scholar
Lepeletier de Saint-Fargeau, A. 1846. Histoire naturelle des insectes. Hyménoptères. Hist. Nat. Insects Hym. 4: (p. 300).Google Scholar
Linnaeus, Carl von. 1790. Insecta Hymenoptera. Syst. Nat., ed. 13, V. 1: 26492808.Google Scholar
Loan, C.C. 1981. North American species of Phytodietus and Neuchorus (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae, Try-phoninae). Naturaliste can. 108: 331470.Google Scholar
Mason, W.R.M. 1955. A revision of the Nearctic Cteniscini (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae). I. Eudiaborus Kerrich and a new genus. Can. J. Zool. 33: 1873.Google Scholar
Mason, W.R.M. 1956. A revision of the Nearctic Cteniscini (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) II. Acrotomus Hlgr. and Smicroplectrus Thom. Can. J. Zool. 34: 120151.Google Scholar
Mason, W.R.M. 1959. A revision of the Nearctic Exenterini (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) III. Exyston Schiodte. Can. J. Zool. 37: 10671115.Google Scholar
Mason, W.R.M. 1960. New Hymenopterous parasites of lodgepole pine needle miners. Can. Ent. 92: 140147.Google Scholar
Mason, W.R.M. 1961. New Ichneumonidae (Hymenoptera) from Tamarack. Can. Ent. 93: 37.Google Scholar
Mason, W.R.M. 1962. Some new Asiatic species of Exenterini (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) with remarks on generic limits. Can. Ent. 94: 12731296.Google Scholar
Mason, W.R.M. 1968. New Canadian Cryptinae (Ichneumonidae: Hymenoptera). Can. Ent. 100: 1723.Google Scholar
Mason, W.R.M. 1974. An endemic subspecies of Echthromorpha agrestoria on Easter Island (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae). Can. Ent. 106: 935936.Google Scholar
Mitchell, R.T. 1950. The genus Acroricnus in America (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae). Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 43: 249261.Google Scholar
Muesebeck, C.F.W., Krombein, K.V., and Townes, H.K.. 1951. Hymenoptera of America north of Mexico. U.S.D.A. Agric. Monogr. 2. 1420 pp.Google Scholar
Norton, E. 1863. Catalogue of our species of Opion, Anomalon, Paniscus and Campoplex. Proc. ent. Soc. Philad. 1: 357368.Google Scholar
Norton, E. 1869. Catalogue of the described Tenthredinidae and Uroceridae of North America. Trans. Am. ent. Soc. 2: 321368.Google Scholar
Payne, J.A., and Mason, W.R.M.. 1971. Hymenoptera associated with pig carrion. Proc. ent. Soc. Wash. 73: 132141.Google Scholar
Porter, C.C. 1967 a. A revision of the South American species of Trachysphyrus. Mem. Am. ent. Inst. 10: 1368.Google Scholar
Porter, C.C. 1967 b. A review of the Chilean genera of the tribe Mesostenini (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae). Studia ent. 10: 369418.Google Scholar
Porter, C.C. 1970. A revision of the South American species of Coccygomimus (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae). Studia ent. 13: 1192.Google Scholar
Porter, C.C. 1978. A revision of the genus Epirhyssa (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae). Studia ent. 20: 297412.Google Scholar
Pratt, H.D. 1945. Taxonomie studies of Nearctic Cryptini (Ichneumonidae, Hymenoptera). Am. Midl. Nat. 34: 549661.Google Scholar
Provancher, Abbé L. 1874. Les icheumonides de Québec avec description de plusieurs espèces nouvelles. Naturaliste can. 6: 2932, 55–63, 78–81, 103–107, 143–151, 173–179, 200–205, 279–285, 298–301, 331–336.Google Scholar
Porter, C.C. 1875. Les ichneumonides de Québec. Naturaliste can. 7: 2026, 48–53, 74–84, 109–121, 138–149, 175–183, 263–274, 309–317, 328–333.Google Scholar
Porter, C.C. 1877. Additions aux ichneumonides de Québec. Naturaliste can. 9: 516.Google Scholar
Porter, C.C. 1879. Faune canadienne. Les insectes. —Hyménoptères. Naturaliste can. 11: 213, 33–43, 65–76, 119–143, 109–122, 141–150, 173–185, 205–233, 248–266, 267–268 (Informations), 269–281.Google Scholar
Porter, C.C. 1880. Faune canadienne. Les insectes. —Hyménoptères. Naturaliste can. 12: 422, 33–48, 65–81, 97–102.Google Scholar
Porter, C.C. 1882. Faune canadienne. Hyménoptères. Additions et corrections. Naturaliste can. 13: 289311, 321–336, 353–368.Google Scholar
Porter, C.C. 1883. Petite faune entomologique du Canada et particulièrement de la province de Québec, vol. 2, comprenant les Orthoptères, les Neuroptères et les Hyménoptères. C. Darveau, Québec. 830 pp.Google Scholar
Porter, C.C. 1885: Additions to North American Hymenoptera. Can. Ent. 17: 114117.Google Scholar
Porter, C.C. 1886. Additions et corrections à la faune Hyménoptérologique de la province de Québec. Fam. IV. Ichneumonides. C. Darveau, Québec, pp. 29121.Google Scholar
Porter, C.C. 1888. Supplément aux additions aux Hyménoptères de la province de Québec. C. Darveau, Québec. pp. 346438.Google Scholar
Rohwer, S.A. 1921. The North American Ichneumon-flies of the tribes Labenini, Rhyssini, Xoridini, Odontomerini, and Phytodietini. Proc. U.S. natn. Mus. 57: 405474.Google Scholar
Ross, I. 1835. Appendix to the narrative of a second voyage in search of a north-west passage, and of a residence in the arctic regions during the years 1829, 1830, 1831, 1832, 1833.Google Scholar
Sanborne, M. 1984. A revision of the world species of Sinophorus (Ichneumonidae). Mem. Am. ent. Inst. 38: 1403.Google Scholar
Sanborne, P.M. 1981. Ptychopsis phalara, a new genus and species of South American Banchinae (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae). Can. Ent. 113: 519521.Google Scholar
Say, T. 1836. Boston J. nat. Hist. 1: (247).Google Scholar
Scudder, S.H. 1889. The butterflies of the Eastern United States and Canada with special reference to New England. Butterfl. Eastern U.S. Can. 3: 17751958.Google Scholar
Slobodchikoff, C.N. 1970. A revision of the genus Grotea (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae). Pan-Pacif. Ent. 46: 5063.Google Scholar
Taschenberg, E.L. 1865. Die Schlupfwespenfamilie Cryptides (Gen. V. Cryptus Gr.) mit besonderer Berucksichtigung der deutschen Arten. Z. ges. Naturw. 25: 1142.Google Scholar
Thomson, C.G. 1887. Hymenopterologische Beitrage. Dt. ent. Z. 31: 193218.Google Scholar
Torgersen, T.R. 1974. A revision of the Holarctic species of Pygocryptus (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae). Can. Ent. 106: 889896.Google Scholar
Townes, H., and Chiu, S.. 1970. The Indo-Australian species of Xanthopimpla (Ichneumonidae). Mem. Am. ent. Inst. 14: 1372.Google Scholar
Townes, H., and Gupta, V.K.. 1962. Ichneumon-flies of America north of Mexico: 4. Subfamily Gelinae, tribe Hemigasterini. Mem. Am. ent. Inst. 2: 1305.Google Scholar
Townes, H., and Townes, M.. 1959. Ichneumon-flies of America north of Mexico: 1. Subfamily Metopiinae. Bull. U.S. natn. Mus. 216 [pt. 1]: 1318.Google Scholar
Townes, H. 1960. Ichneumon-flies of America north of Mexico: 2. Subfamilies Ephialtinae Xoridinae Acaenitinae. Bull. U.S. natn. Mus. 261 [pt. 2]: 1676.Google Scholar
Townes, H. 1962. Ichneumon-flies of America north of Mexico: 3. Subfamily Gelinae, tribe Mesostenini. Bull. U.S. natn. Mus. 216 [pt.3]: 1602.Google Scholar
Townes, H. 1978. Ichneumon-flies of America North of Mexico: 7. Subfamily Banchinae, tribes Lissonotini and Banchini. Mem. Am. ent. Inst. 26: 1614.Google Scholar
Townes, H. K. Jr., 1944, 1945. A catalogue and reclassification of the Nearctic Ichneumonidae (Hymenoptera). Mem. Am. ent. Soc. 11 (Part I and II): 1925.Google Scholar
Townes, H.K., and Townes, M.C.. 1949. A revision of the genera and of the American species of Tryphonini (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae). Part I. Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 42: 321395.Google Scholar
Viereck, H.L. 1905. Trans. Kans. Acad. Sci. 19: (318).Google Scholar
Viereck, H.L. 1906. Notes and descriptions of Hymenoptera from the western United States. Trans. Am. ent. Soc. 32: 173247.Google Scholar
Viereck, H.L. 1912. Contributions to our knowledge of bees and Ichneumon-flies, including the descriptions of twenty-one new genera and fifty-seven new species of Ichneumon-flies. Proc. U.S. natn. Mus. 42: 613648.Google Scholar
Viereck, H.L. 1913. Descriptions of one new family, eight new genera, and thirty-three new species of Ichneumon-flies. Proc. U.S. natn. Mus. 43: 575593.Google Scholar
Viereck, H.L. 1916. The Hymenoptera, or wasp-like insects, of Connecticut. Bull. Conn. St. geol. nat. Hist. Surv. 22: 1824.Google Scholar
Viereck, H.L. 1921. Descriptions of new Ichneumonidae in the collection of the museum of comparative zoology, Cambridge, Mass. Psyche, Camb. 28: 7083.Google Scholar
Viereck, H.L. 1924 a. Descriptions of new reared Hymenoptera from Nova Scotia and British Columbia. Can. Ent. 56: 6469.Google Scholar
Viereck, H.L. 1924 b. Descriptions of new Hymenoptera in the Canadian National Collection, Ottawa. Can. Ent. 56: 110112.Google Scholar
Viereck, H.L. 1924 c. A remarkable ichneumonine. Can. Ent. 56: 202.Google Scholar
Viereck, H.L. 1924 d. Two genera of Ichneumonidae. Can. Ent. 56: 300301.Google Scholar
Viereck, H.L. 1925 a. New genera and species of Ichneumonoidea in the Canadian National Collection. Can. Ent. 57: 7178.Google Scholar
Viereck, H.L. 1925 b. A preliminary revision of the Campopleginae in the Canadian National Collection, Ottawa. Can. Ent. 57: 176181, 223–228, 296–303.Google Scholar
Viereck, H.L. 1925 c. Two new Canadian Ichneumonoidea. Can. Ent. 57: 278.Google Scholar
Viereck, H.L. 1925 d. A preliminary revision of some Charopsinae, a sub-family of Ichneumonoidea or Ichneumon flies. Proc. Trans. R. Soc. Can. 19: 259273.Google Scholar
Viereck, H.L. 1926 a. A preliminary revision of the Campopleginae in the Canadian National Collection, Ottawa. Can. Ent. 58: 28, 30–38, 71–78, 122–130, 143–149, 176–182, 196–201, 219–225, 257–260, 276–283.Google Scholar
Viereck, H.L. 1926 b. A preliminary revision of some Charopsinae, a sub-family of Ichneumonoidea, or Ichneumon-flies. Part 2. Proc. Trans. R. Soc. Can. 20: 173186.Google Scholar
Viereck, H.L. 1926 c. Descriptions of new Ichneumon-flies from Canada. Can. Ent. 58: 5456.Google Scholar
Walley, G.S. 1926. A new Sagaritis From Western Canada (Hymen.). Can. Ent. 58: 225 (see correction p. 240).Google Scholar
Walley, G.S. 1927. New species of Sagaritis with a key to the genus (Ichneumonidae, Hymen.). Can. Ent. 59: 227–234.Google Scholar
Walley, G.S. 1929 a. Descriptions of new Canadian parasitic Hymenoptera. Can. Ent. 61: 190194.Google Scholar
Walley, G.S. 1929 b. A new Campoplegidea parasitic on Ellopia fiscellaria Gn. (Hymen., Ichneumonidae). Can. Ent. 61: 2223.Google Scholar
Walley, G.S. 1931. New Canadian species of Arenetra (Hymen.; Ichneumonidae). Can. Ent. 63: 168171.Google Scholar
Walley, G.S. 1932. Host records and new species of Canadian Hymenoptera. Can. Ent. 64: 181189.Google Scholar
Walley, G.S. 1933. New and little known Canadian parasitic Hymenoptera (Ichneumonoidea). Can. Ent. 65: 253261.Google Scholar
Walley, G.S. 1934. Descriptions of five new species of Canadian Ichneumonidae. Can. Ent. 66: 235241.Google Scholar
Walley, G.S. 1935 a. The genus Cidaphus in Canada (Hymen.; Ichneumonidae). Can. Ent. 67: 111112.Google Scholar
Walley, G.S. 1935 b. Descriptions of two new species of Xenoschesis with a key to the genus (Hymenop.; Ichneumonidae). Can. Ent. 67: 179181.Google Scholar
Walley, G.S. 1936. A new Schizopyga from Canada (Hymenop.; Ichneumonidae). Can. Ent. 68: 2021.Google Scholar
Walley, G.S. 1937 a. Notes on the types of some Ichneumonidae described by Provancher (Hymenop.). Can. Ent. 69: 115117.Google Scholar
Walley, G.S. 1937 b. The genus Smicroplectrus in Canada (Hymen.; Ichneumonidae). Can. Ent. 69: 131136.Google Scholar
Walley, G.S. 1937 c. New Canadian Ichneumon flies with some notes on synonymy (Hymen.: Ichneumonoidea). Can. Ent. 69: 189193.Google Scholar
Walley, G.S. 1938. Notes on the genus Protarchoides (Hymen., Ichneumonidae). Can. Ent. 70: 230232.Google Scholar
Walley, G.S. 1940 a. revision of the Ichneumon-flies of the genus Campoplegidea occurring in America north of Mexico. Sci. Agric. 20: 647734.Google Scholar
Walley, G.S. 1940 b. A synopsis of the North American species of Syndipnus (Hymen., Ichneumonidae). Can. Ent. 72: 135145.Google Scholar
Walley, G.S. 1940 c. A new species of Brachycyrtus from British Columbia (Hymen.; Ichneumonidae). Can. Ent. 72: 8586.Google Scholar
Walley, G.S. 1941. Some new and little known Canadian Ichneumonidae (Hymenoptera). Can. Ent. 73: 164170.Google Scholar
Walley, G.S. 1942 a. A new Olesicampe parasite of Pikonema sawflies (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonide). Can. Ent. 74: 193194.Google Scholar
Walley, G.S. 1942 b. A new Canadian species of Asphragis (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae). Can. Ent. 74: 234236.Google Scholar
Walley, G.S. 1944. Campoplegine notes and descriptions (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae). Can. Ent. 76: 157161.Google Scholar
Walley, G.S. 1945. A new Canadian species of Syndipnus, with records of other species (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae). Can. Ent. 77: 4143.Google Scholar
Walley, G.S. 1947. The genus Casinaria Holmgren in America north of Mexico (Hymen., Ichneumonidae). Sci. Agric. 27: 364395.Google Scholar
Walley, G.S. 1959. A new species of Casinaria from British Columbia (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae). Can. Ent. 91: 565566.Google Scholar
Walley, G.S. 1961. A new Pimplopterus parasite of Argyresthia lancetta (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae). Can. Ent. 93: 13.Google Scholar
Walley, G.S. 1963. A new Synetaeris parasite of the spruce budworm in Canada (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae). Can. Ent. 95: 2324.Google Scholar
Walley, G.S. 1966. A review of the Nearctic genus Bothromus Townes and Townes, with a description of one new species (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae). Can. Ent. 98: 12721275.Google Scholar
Walley, G.S. 1967. Nearctic species of the Diadegma stenosomus complex (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae). Can. Ent. 99: 925943.Google Scholar
Walley, G.S. 1969. A synopsis of the nearctic species of the Onitis group of the genus Trieces (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae). Can. Ent. 101: 10921106.Google Scholar
Walley, G.S. 1970. A new nearctic Campoletis parasite of Pyralidae (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae). Can. Ent. 102: 15281530.Google Scholar
Walley, G.S. 1977. Revision of the New World genus Campoctonus Viereck (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae; Campopleginae). Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 70: 423435.Google Scholar
Walley, G.S., and Barren, J. R.. 1977. Nearctic Glypta parasites (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) of conifer feeding Olethreutidae (Lepidoptera). Ent. News 88: 177184.Google Scholar
Walsh, B.D. 1873. Descriptions of North American Hymenoptera. Trans. Acad. Sci. St Louis 3: 65166.Google Scholar