Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T17:22:06.660Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

THE ODONATA OF THE NORTHERN CORDILLERAN PEATLANDS OF NORTH AMERICA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Sydney G. Cannings
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6T 2A9
Robert A. Cannings
Affiliation:
Royal British Columbia Museum, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada V8V 1X4
Get access

Abstract

The peatlands of the northern Cordillera of North America (consisting of the mountain ranges and intermontane lowlands and plateaus of British Columbia, Alberta, the Northwest Territories, the Yukon, and Alaska) support a distinctive Odonata fauna. Forty species in six families and 12 genera are typical of northwestern peatlands and another 12 species are occasional inhabitants of these environments. Of the 40 species, eight (20%) are peatland obligates and four (10%) almost always occur in such habitats. The remaining 28 (70%) are generalists and live in a wide range of aquatic habitats; nevertheless, they often are common inhabitants of, or are even dominant in, peatland environments. The fauna is dominated by the genera Aeshna Fabricius and Somatochlora Selys, with 11 and 10 species, respectively. It is also dominated by species restricted to Boreal regions (25 species, 62.5%), six (15%) of which have Holarctic distributions. The remainder of the fauna consists of eight species (20%) ranging transcontinentally in Transition Zone forests south of the Boreal Forest, five (12.5%) restricted to the Cordillera, and two (5%) with wide distributions in North America. Notes and maps summarize our knowledge of biogeographical information and previously unpublished records are listed. Significant southerly range extensions for species such as Coenagrion interrogatum (Hagen), Aeshna septentrionalis Burmeister, A. sitchensis Hagen, A. subarctica Walker, Somatochlora septentrionalis (Hagen), and Leucorrhinia patricia Walker are reported. Ecological and natural history data are outlined for each species. There do not appear to be any clear differences between the faunas of bogs and fens; dragonflies seem to respond to the habitat's form and structure rather than to its acidity or nutrient levels. Distinctive species associations result. A better understanding of the preferences of these dragonflies for different peatland microhabitats must await detailed research on oviposition behaviour and larval ecology.

Résumé

Les tourbières du nord de la cordillère d’Amérique du Nord (montagnes, vallées et plateaux de la Colombie-Britannique, de l’Alberta, des Territoires du Nord-Ouest, du Yukon et de l’Alaska) rassemblent une faune particulière d’odonates. Quarante espèces appartenant à six familles et à 12 genres sont typiques des zones tourbeuses du nord-ouest et 12 autres espèces sont des habitants occasionnels de ces milieux. Parmi les 40 espèces, huit (20%) sont restreintes aux milieux tourbeux, et quatre (10%) se retrouvent presque exclusivement dans ces milieux. Les autres espèces, 28 (70%), sont des généralistes et occupent toute une gamme de milieux aquatiques; elles se retrouvent néanmoins souvent dans les tourbières et même parfois y prédominent. La faune est dominée par les genres Aeshna Fabricius et Somatochlora Selys, représentés par 11 et 12 espèces respectivement; elle est également dominée par des espèces strictements boréales (25 espèces, 62,5%), dont six (15%) ont une répartition holarctique. Le reste de la faune comprend huit espèces (20%) de répartition transcontinentale dans les forêts de la zone de transition au sud de la forêt boréale, cinq espèces (12,5%) restreintes à la cordillère et deux espèces (5%) répandues partout en Amérique du Nord. Des notes et des cartes résument nos connaissances sur la biogéographie des espèces et contiennent des additions inédites. Certaines espèces ont été trouvées beaucoup plus au sud que prévu d’après les répartitions connues antérieurement, particulièrement Coenagrion interrogatum (Hagen), Aeshna septentrionalis Burmeister, A. sitchensis Hagen, A. subarctica Walker, Somatochlora septentrionalis (Hagen) et Leucorrhinia patricia Walker. Des notes écologiques et des détails sur la biologie de chaque espèce sont donnés. Il ne semble pas y avoir de différence marquée entre la faune des tourbières ombrotrophes et celle des tourbières minérotrophes; les libellules semblent réagir à la forme et à la structure de leur habitat plutôt qu’à son acidité ou à la quantité de matières nutritives qui s’y trouvent, ce qui donne lieu à des associations particulières d’espèces. Pour une meilleure compréhension des préférences de ces libellules pour différents microhabitats herbeux, il faudra procéder à des études détaillées de leur comportement de ponte et de leur écologie larvaire. [Traduit par la Rédaction]

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

Present address: B.C. Conservation Data Centre, 780 Blanshard St., Victoria, B.C., Canada V8V lX4; Research Associate, Royal B.C. Museum, Victoria, B.C., Canada V8V 1X4.

References

Acorn, J.H. 1983. New distribution records of Odonata from Alberta, Canada. Notulae odonatologicae 2(2): 1819.Google Scholar
Cannings, R.A. 1978. The distribution of Tanypteryx hageni (Odonata: Petaluridae) in British Columbia. Journal of the Entomological Society of British Columbia 75: 1819.Google Scholar
Cannings, R.A. 1982. Notes on the biology of Aeshna sitchensis Hagen (Anisoptera: Aeshnidae). Odonatologica 11(3): 219223.Google Scholar
Cannings, R.A. 1983. Field Trips Handbook of the Seventh International Symposium of Odonatology, Calgary. Societas Internationalis Odonatologica (S.I.O.), Calgary, Alta. 24 pp.Google Scholar
Cannings, R.A., and Cannings, S.G.. 1983 a. The Odonata of the Brooks Peninsula, Vancouver Island, British Columbia. Journal of the Entomological Society of British Columbia 80: 4651.Google Scholar
Cannings, R.A., and Cannings, S.G.. 1983 b. Odonata collected in Banff National Park, Alberta, Canada, during the Seventh International Symposium of Odonatology. Notulae odonatologicae 2(2): 2324.Google Scholar
Cannings, R.A., and Stuart, K.M.. 1977. The Dragonflies of British Columbia. British Columbia Provincial Museum, Handbook 35. Victoria, B.C.Google Scholar
Cannings, S.G. 1980. New distribution records of Odonata from northwestern British Columbia. Syesis 13: 1315.Google Scholar
Cannings, S.G. 1985. Odonata collected in coastal British Columbia, Canada, in July–August, 1984. Notulae odonatologicae 2: 7375.Google Scholar
Cannings, S.G., and Cannings, R.A.. 1980. The larva of Coenagrion interrogatum (Odonata: Coenagrionidae), with notes on the species in the Yukon. The Canadian Entomologist 112: 437441.Google Scholar
Cannings, S.G., and Cannings, R.A.. 1985. The larva of Somatochlora sahlbergi Trybom, with notes on the species in the Yukon Territory, Canada (Anisoptera: Corduliidae). Odonatologica 14: 319330.Google Scholar
Cannings, S.G., Cannings, R.A., and Cannings, R.J.. 1991. The distribution of the dragonflies (Insecta: Odonata) of the Yukon Territory, Canada, with notes on ecology and behaviour. Royal British Columbia Museum Contributions to Natural Science 13: 126.Google Scholar
Danks, H.V., and Foottit, R.G.. 1989. Insects of the Boreal Zone of Canada. The Canadian Entomologist 121: 625690.Google Scholar
Ecoregions Working Group. 1989. Ecoclimatic Regions of Canada, First Approximation. Ecological Land Classification Series 23: 119 pp. Secretariat, Canada Committee of Ecological Land Classification. Sustainable Development Branch, Canadian Wildlife Service, Environment Canada, Ottawa, Ont.Google Scholar
Hilton, D.F.J. 1985. Dragonflies (Odonata) of Cypress Hills Provincial Park, Alberta, and their biogeographic significance. The Canadian Entomologist 117: 11271136.Google Scholar
Hilton, D.F.J. 1987. Odonata of peatlands and marshes in Canada, pp. 57–63 in Rosenberg, D.M., and Danks, H.V. (Eds.), Aquatic Insects of Peatlands and Marshes in Canada. Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada 140: 174 pp.Google Scholar
Matthews, J.V. Jr., 1982. East Beringia during late Wisconsin time: A review of the biotic evidence. pp. 127150in Paleoecology of Beringia. Academic Press, New York, NY.Google Scholar
Remington, C.L. 1968. Suture-zones of hybrid interaction between recently joined biotas. Evolutionary Biology 2: 321428.Google Scholar
Robert, A. 1953. Les odonates du Parc du Mont Tremblant. The Canadian Entomologist 85: 316339.Google Scholar
Walker, E.M. 1927. The Odonata of the Canadian Cordillera. Bulletin of the Provincial Museum of Natural History, Victoria, B.C.16 pp.Google Scholar
Walker, E.M. 1953. The Odonata of Canada and Alaska. Vol. 1. University of Toronto Press, Toronto, Ont.292 pp.Google Scholar
Walker, E.M. 1958. The Odonata of Canada and Alaska. Vol. 2. University of Toronto Press, Toronto, Ont.318 pp.Google Scholar
Walker, E.M., and Corbet, P.S.. 1975. The Odonata of Canada and Alaska. Vol. 3. University of Toronto Press, Toronto, Ont.307 pp.Google Scholar
Whitehouse, F.C. 1918. A week's collecting on Coliseum Mountain, Nordegg, Alberta. The Canadian Entomologist 50: 17.Google Scholar
Whitehouse, F.C. 1941. British Columbia dragonflies (Odonata) with notes on distribution and habits. American Midland Naturalist 26: 488557.Google Scholar
Zoltai, S.C. 1987. Peatlands and marshes in the wetland regions of Canada, pp. 5–13 in Rosenberg, D.M., and Danks, H.V. (Eds.), Aquatic Insects of Peatlands and Marshes in Canada. Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada 140: 174 pp.Google Scholar
Zoltai, S.C. 1988. Wetland environments and classification. pp. 10–26 in Wetlands of Canada (National Wetlands Working Group). Ecological Land Classification Series 24. Sustainable Development Branch, Environment Canada, Ottawa, Ont., and Polyscience Publications, Inc., Montreal, P.Q.Google Scholar