Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T12:30:23.357Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Stochastic integrals in an arbitrary probability gauge space

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

C. Barnett
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Bedford College, Regent's Park, London NW1 4NS
R. F. Streater
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Bedford College, Regent's Park, London NW1 4NS
I. F. Wilde
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Bedford College, Regent's Park, London NW1 4NS

Extract

In § 7 of [1] we described how a stochastic integral of non-commuting process cesan be constructed. This was achieved via a Doob-Meyer decomposition for the square of a self-adjoint L2-martingale. We introduced a ‘condition D'’ derived from the lsquo;class D’ of stochastic process theory, and showed that if the square of a self-adjoint L2-martingale satisfies this condition then it has a decomposition of the Doob-Meyer type. The purpose of this paper is to extend the results of § 7 of [1] and to introduce another construction of the stochastic integral that does not employ condition D.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Barnett, C., Streater, R. F. and Wilde, I. F.. The Ito Clifford integral. J. Funct. Anal. 48 (1982), 172212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2] Barnett, C.. Supermartingales on semifinite von Neumann algebras. J. London Math. Soc. (2) 24 (1981), 175181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3] Bartle, R. G.. A general bilinear vector integral. Studia Math. 15 (1956), 337352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4] kopp, P. E.. Martingales and Stochastic Integrals. (Cambridge University Press, 1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5] Yeadon, F. J.. Non-commutative L 9 spaces. Math. Proc. Cambridge Philon. Soc. 77 (1975), 91102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar