Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-sv6ng Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-15T18:29:35.089Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Small non-Leighton two-complexes

Part of: Special aspects of infinite or finite groups Graph theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2022

NATALIA S. DERGACHEVA  and
ANTON A. KLYACHKO
NATALIA S. DERGACHEVA
Affiliation:
Faculty of Mechanics and Mathematics of Moscow State University, Moscow 119991, Leninskie gory, MSU, Moscow, Russia. and Moscow Center for Fundamental and Applied Mathematics e-mails: nataliya.dergacheva@gmail.com, klyachko@mech.math.msu.su
ANTON A. KLYACHKO
Affiliation:
Faculty of Mechanics and Mathematics of Moscow State University, Moscow 119991, Leninskie gory, MSU, Moscow, Russia. and Moscow Center for Fundamental and Applied Mathematics e-mails: nataliya.dergacheva@gmail.com, klyachko@mech.math.msu.su
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

How many 2-cells must two finite CW-complexes have to admit a common, but not finite common, covering? Leighton’s theorem says that both complexes must have 2-cells. We construct an almost (?) minimal example with two 2-cells in each complex.

MSC classification

Secondary: 20F05: Generators, relations, and presentations 05C65: Hypergraphs 05C25: Graphs and abstract algebra (groups, rings, fields, etc.)
Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 174 , Issue 2 , March 2023 , pp. 385 - 391
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Cambridge Philosophical Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

This work was supported by the Russian Science Foundation, project no. 22-11-00075.

References

Abello, J., Fellows, M. R. and Stillwell, J. C.. On the complexity and combinatorics of covering finite complexes. Australas. J. Combin. 4 (1991), 103–112.Google Scholar
Bass, H. and Kulkarni, R.. Uniform tree lattices. J. Amer. Math. Soc. 3:4 (1990), 843–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bondarenko, I. and Kivva, B.. Automaton groups and complete square complexes. Groups, Geometry, and Dynamics, 16:1 (2022), 305–332. See also arXiv: 707.00215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bridson, M. and Shepherd, S.. Leighton’s theorem: extensions, limitations, and quasitrees. Algebraic and Geometric Topology (to appear). See also arXiv: 009.04305.Google Scholar
Caprace, P.-E. and Wesolek, P.. Indicability, residual finiteness, and simple subquotients of groups acting on trees. Geometry and Topology 22:7 (2018), 4163–4204. See also arXiv: 708.04590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casals-Ruiz, M., Kazachkov, I. and Zakharov, A.. Commensurability of Baumslag–Solitar groups. Indiana Univ. Math. J. 70:6 (2021), 2527–2555. See also arXiv: 1910.02117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fomenko, A. and Fuchs, D.. Homotopical topology, 2nd ed., Graduate Texts in Math. vol. 273 (Springer, Cham, 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janzen, D. and Wise, D. T.. A smallest irreducible lattice in the product of trees. Algebraic and Geometric Topology 9:4 (2009), 2191–2201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kargapolov, M. I. and Merzljakov, Yu. I.. Fundamentals of the theory of groups. Graduate Texts in Math. 62 (Springer, 1979).Google Scholar
Leighton, F. T.. Finite common coverings of graphs. J. Combin. Theory, Series B 33:3 (1982), 231–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitt, G.. Quotients and subgroups of Baumslag–Solitar groups. J. Group Theory, 18:1 (2015), 1–43. See also arXiv: 308.5122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyndon, R. and Schupp, P.. Combinatorial Group Theory (Springer, 2015).Google Scholar
Meskin, S.. Nonresidually finite one-relator groups. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 164 (1972), 105–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neumann, W. D.. On Leighton’s graph covering theorem. Groups, Geometry, and Dynamics, 4:4 (2010), 863–872. See also arXiv: 906.2496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepherd, S., Gardam, G. and Woodhouse, D. J.. Two generalisations of Leighton’s Theorem, arXiv:1908.00830.Google Scholar
Tucker, T. W.. Some topological graph theory for topologists: A sampler of covering space constructions. In: Latiolais P. (eds) Topology and Combinatorial Group Theory. Lecture Notes in Math., 1440 (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1990).Google Scholar
Wise, D. T.. Non-positively curved squared complexes: Aperiodic tilings and non-residually finite groups. PhD. thesis. Princeton Univeristy (1996).Google Scholar
Wise, D. T.. Complete square complexes. Comment. Math. Helv. 82:4 (2007), 683–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodhouse, D.. Revisiting Leighton’s theorem with the Haar measure. Math. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 170:3 (2021), 615–623. See also arXiv: 806.08196CrossRefGoogle Scholar