Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T07:08:10.233Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the decomposition into Discrete, Type II and Type III C*-algebras

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 August 2017

CHI–KEUNG NG
Affiliation:
Chern Institute of Mathematics and LPMC, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China. e-mail: ckng@nankai.edu.cn
NGAI–CHING WONG
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Mathematics, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung, 80424, Taiwan. e-mail: wong@math.nsysu.edu.tw

Abstract

We obtained a “decomposition scheme” of C*-algebras. We show that the classes of discrete C*-algebras (as defined by Peligard and Zsidó), type II C*-algebras and type III C*-algebras (both defined by Cuntz and Pedersen) form a good framework to “classify” C*-algebras. In particular, we found that these classes are closed under strong Morita equivalence, hereditary C*-subalgebras as well as taking “essential extension” and “normal quotient”. Furthermore, there exist the largest discrete finite ideal Ad,1, the largest discrete essentially infinite ideal Ad,∞, the largest type II finite ideal AII,1, the largest type II essentially infinite ideal AII,∞, and the largest type III ideal AIII of any C*-algebra A such that Ad,1 + Ad,∞ + AII,1 + AII,∞ + AIII is an essential ideal of A. This “decomposition” extends the corresponding one for W*-algebras.

We also give a closer look at C*-algebras with Hausdorff primitive ideal spaces, AW*-algebras as well as local multiplier algebras of C*-algebras. We find that these algebras can be decomposed into continuous fields of prime C*-algebras over a locally compact Hausdorff space, with each fiber being non-zero and of one of the five types mentioned above.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Akemann, C. A. The general Stone–Weierstrass problem. J. Funct. Anal. 4 (1969), 277294.Google Scholar
[2] Akemann, C. A. Left ideal structure of C*-algebras. J. Funct. Anal. 6 (1970), 305-317.Google Scholar
[3] Ara, P. and Mathieu, M. On the central Haagerup tensor product. Proc. Edin. Math. Soc. 37 (1994), 161-174.Google Scholar
[4] Archbold, R. J. and Somerset, D. W. B. Quasi-standard C*-algebras. Math. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 107 (1990), 349-360.Google Scholar
[5] Blackadar, B. Operator algebras: theory of C*-algebras and von Neumann algebras. Encyc. Math. Sci. 122 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin 2006).Google Scholar
[6] Blackadar, B. and Handelman, D. Dimension functions and traces on C*-algebras. J. Funct. Anal. 45 (1982), 297C340.Google Scholar
[7] Bonsall, F. F. and Duncan, J. Complete Normed Algebras, (Springer-Verlag, Berlin 1973).Google Scholar
[8] Brown, L. G. and Pedersen, G. K. C*-algebras of real rank zero. J. Funct. Anal. 99 (1991), 131-149.Google Scholar
[9] Cuntz, J. K-theory for certain C*-algebras. Ann. of Math. 113 (1981), 181-197.Google Scholar
[10] Cuntz, J. and Pedersen, G. K. Equivalence and traces on C*-algebras. J. Funct. Anal. 33 (1979), 135-164.Google Scholar
[11] Dixmier, J. C*-Algebras (North-Holland Publishing, 1977).Google Scholar
[12] Dupré, M. J. and Gillette, R. M.. Banach bundles, Banach modules and automorphisms of C*-algebras, Research Notes in Mathematics 92 (Pitman, 1983).Google Scholar
[13] Haagerup, U. Quasitraces on exact C*-algebras are traces. C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Soc. R. Can. 36 (2014), 67C92.Google Scholar
[14] Kadison, R. V. and Ringrose, J. R. Fundamentals of the theory of operator algebras Vol. II: Advanced theory, Pure and Applied Mathematics 100 (Academic Press, 1986).Google Scholar
[15] Kirchberg, E. and Rørdam, M.. Non-simple purely infinite C*-algebras. Amer. J. Math. 122 (2000), 637666.Google Scholar
[16] Lance, E. C. Hilbert C*-modules - A toolkit for operator algebraists. Lond. Math. Soc. Lect. Note Ser. 210 (Camb. University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
[17] Leung, C. W. and Ng, C. K. Invariant ideals of twisted crossed products. Math. Zeit. 243 (2003), 409-421.Google Scholar
[18] Lin, H. Equivalent open projections and corresponding hereditary C*-subalgebras. J. Lond. Math. Soc. 41 (1990), 295-301.Google Scholar
[19] Murphy, G. J. C*-algebras and operator theory (Academic Press, 1990).Google Scholar
[20] Murray, F. J. The rings of operators papers, in The legacy of John von Neumann (Hempstead, NY, 1988), 57-60. Proc. Sympos. Pure Math. 50. (Amer. Math. Soc. Providence, R.I., 1990).Google Scholar
[21] Murray, F. J. and Von Neumann, J. On rings of operators Ann. of Math. (2), 37 (1936), 116-229.Google Scholar
[22] Ng, C. K. Morita equivalences between fixed point algebras and crossed products. Math. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 125 (1999), 43-52.Google Scholar
[23] Ng, C. K. Strictly amenable representations of reduced group C*-algebras. Int. Math. Res. Notices. to appear.Google Scholar
[24] Ng, C. K. On extension of lower semi-continuous semi-finite traces, in preparation.Google Scholar
[25] Ng, C. K. and Wong, N. C. A Murray-von Neumann type classification of C*-algebras, in Operator Semigroups Meet Complex Analysis, Harmonic Analysis and Mathematical Physics, Herrnhut, Germany (in honor of Prof. Charles Batty for his 60th birthday), Operator Theory: Advance and Applications, 250 (Springer Internat. Publ. 2015), 369-395.Google Scholar
[26] Pedersen, G. K. C*-algebras and their automorphism groups (Academic Press, 1979).Google Scholar
[27] Peligrad, C. and Zsidó, L. Open projections of C*-algebras: Comparison and Regularity, in Operator Theoretical Methods, 17th Int. Conf. on Operator Theory, Timisoara (Romania), June 23-26, (1998). Theta Found. Bucharest (2000), 285-300Google Scholar
[28] Rørdam, M. A simple C*-algebra with a finite and an infinite projection. Acta Math. 191 (2003), 109-142.Google Scholar
[29] Somerset, D. W. B. The local multiplier algebra of a C*-algebra. Quart. J. Math. Oxford, Ser. 2, 47 (1996), 123-132.Google Scholar
[30] Zhang, S. Stable isomorphism of hereditary C*-subalgebras and stable equivalence of open projections. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 105 (1989), 677-682.Google Scholar