Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-wxhwt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T13:36:14.532Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Geometrical Properties of Three Symmetric Matrices

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

H. W. Turnbull*
Affiliation:
Trinity College

Extract

In the early editions of the Geometry of Three Dimensions Salmon had stated that the equations of any three quadric surfaces could be simultaneously reduced to the sums of five squares. Such a reduction is not possible in general, but can be performed if and only if a certain combinant Λ, of the net of quadrics, vanishes. Algebraically the theory of such a net of quadrics is equivalent, as Hesse(2) showed, to that of a plane quartic curve: and the condition for the equation a quartic to be expressible to the sum of five fourth powers is equivalent to the condition Λ = 0(1). While Clebsch(3) was the first to establish this condition, Lüroth(4) gave it more explicit form by studying the quartic curve

which satisfies the condition. Frahm(5) seems to have been the first to prove the impossibility of the above reduction of three general quadric surfaces, by remarking that the plane quartic curve obtained in Hesse's way from the locus of the vertices of cones of the net of quadrics would be a Lüroth quartic. Frahm further remarked that the three quadrics, so conditioned, could be regarded as the polar quadrics belonging to a cubic surface in ∞2 ways; but that for three general quadrics no such cubic surface exists. An explicit algebraical account of these properties was given by E. Toeplitz(6), who incidentally noticed that certain linear complexes associated with three general quadrics became special linear complexes when Λ = 0. This polar property of three quadrics in [3] was generalized to n dimensions by Anderson (7).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1935

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1) Salmon-Rogers, , Analytic geometry of three dimensions, 1 (1914), 242–4.Google Scholar
(2) Hesse, , J. f. Math. 49 (1855), 279332.Google Scholar
(3) Clebsch, , J. f. Math. 59 (1861), 125.Google Scholar
(4) Lüroth, , Math. Annalen, 1 (1869), 37. (Cf. Encyc. Math. Wiss. iii C 10 a 1516.)10.1007/BF01447385Google Scholar
(5) Frahm, , Math. Annalen, 7 (1874), 635.10.1007/BF02104932Google Scholar
(6) Toeplitz, , Math. Annalen, 11 (1877), 434–63.10.1007/BF01442610Google Scholar
(7) Anderson, , Proc. Edin. Math. Soc. (2), 3 (1932), 289–95.10.1017/S0013091500027371Google Scholar
(8) Williamson, , Proc. Edin. Math. Soc. (1), 42 (1923), 2940, and Turnbull, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (2), 20 (1921), 465–89.10.1017/S0013091500036105Google Scholar
(9) Saddler, , Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (2), 30 (1930), 107–17 (111).10.1112/plms/s2-30.1.107Google Scholar
(10) Turnbull, , Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (2), 25 (1926), 303–27 (319).10.1112/plms/s2-25.1.303Google Scholar