Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vpsfw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T22:04:11.821Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The emission and absorption of heavy electrons

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

H. S. W. Massey  and
H. C. Corben
H. S. W. Massey
Affiliation:
University CollegeLondon
H. C. Corben
Affiliation:
Trinity CollegeCambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The quantum theory of the heavy electron field is applied to calculate approximately the cross-sections for “photoelectric” absorption of heavy electrons by a bound nuclear particle and for emission of a heavy electron by a free nuclear particle on collision with a nucleus. The absorption cross-section per nuclear particle is of the order 10−26 cm.2 for heavy electrons with energies up to 108 e.V., but probably decreases rapidly at higher energies. Although the energy loss of a proton, of energy 108 e.V. or higher, due to heavy electron emission is found to be greater than that due to radiation, the cross-section is very small (⋍ 10−29 cm.2) and the phenomenon is unlikely to be observed in a cloud chamber. In the present state of theory it is impossible to decide whether radiative emission of heavy electrons by nuclear particles is capable of contributing appreciably to the heavy electrons observed at sea-level but, if so, the cross-section for the process must be very much greater at high energies than in the non-relativistic energy region which we have investigated.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 35 , Issue 1 , January 1939 , pp. 84 - 94
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1939

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

* Proc. Phys. Math. Soc. Japan, 17 (1935), 48Google Scholar; 19 (1937), 712; and Sakata, ibid. 19 (1937), 1084.

† J. Phys. Radium, 7 (1936), 347.Google Scholar

‡ Kemmer, , Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 166 (1938), 127CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Fröhlich, , Heitler, and Kemmer, , Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 166 (1938), 154CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Yukawa, , Sakata, and Taketani, , Proc. Phys. Math. Soc. Japan, 20 (1938), 319Google Scholar; Bhabha, , Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 166 (1938), 501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

§ Cf. Heisenberg, , Z. Phys. 110 (1938), 251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

* Heitler, , Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 166 (1938), 529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

† Loc. cit.

‡ Dirac, , Quantum mechanics, 2nd ed. (Oxford, 1935), pp. 254–5.Google Scholar

* Compare the theory of the atomic photoelectric effect (Heitler, , Quantum theory of radiation (Oxford, 1936), p. 125)Google Scholar.

* Fröhlich, Heitler and Kemmer, loc. cit.

† We have again taken f = g.

‡ Mott, and Massey, , Theory of atomic collisions (Oxford, 1933), p. 85.Google Scholar

† Phys. Rev. 48 (1935), 367.Google Scholar

‡ Phys. Rev. 50 (1936), 560.Google Scholar

§ This is a reasonable procedure to adopt since we use Born's approximation in calculating the emission probability.

* Heitler, , The quantum theory of radiation (Oxford, 1936), p. 172.Google Scholar