Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-01T20:58:42.382Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Adsorption Isotherms. Critical Conditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

R. H. Fowler
Affiliation:
Trinity College

Extract

1. In a recent note I showed that Langmuir's adsorption isotherm

where θ is the fraction of the surface covered by adsorbed gas, p the gas pressure in equilibrium with it, and A (T) a specified function of the temperature, can be derived as a theorem in statistical mechanics without any appeal to the mechanism of deposition and re-evaporation. Necessary and sufficient assumptions for the truth of (1) are that the atoms (or molecules) of the gas are adsorbed as wholes on to definite points of attachment on the surface of the adsorber, that each point of attachment can accommodate one and only one adsorbed atom, and that the energies of the states of any adsorbed atom are independent of the presence or absence of other adsorbed atoms on neighbouring points of attachment. Under these assumptions the explicit form of (1) is

where m is the mass of the adsorbed atom or molecule, bg(T) the partition function for its internal states in the gas phase, and vs(T) the partition function for its set of adsorbed states. These sets of states are to be so specified that the energy zero is assigned tot the lowest state of each set in constructing bg(T) and vs(T), and then X is the energy required to transfer a molecule from the lowest adsorbed state tot the lowest gas state. Quite another adsorption isotherm was shown to hold when adsorption of a molecule takes place as atoms and requires two or more points of attachment.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1936

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

* Fowler, R. H., Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 31 (1935), 260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

* Frenkel, , Zeit. f. Physik, 26 (1924), 117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bragg, and Williams, , Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 145 (1934), 699CrossRefGoogle Scholar; 151 (1935), 540; Williams, , Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 152 (1935), 231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bethe, , Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 150 (1935), 552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

* Ising, , Zeit. f. Physik, 31 (1925), 253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

* Such variations seem to agree with observations. See Cockcroft, , Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 119 (1928), 293CrossRefGoogle Scholar, especially § 3 (iv).

* Semenoff, , Zeit. physikal. Chemie, B. 7 (1930), 471.Google Scholar