Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T06:20:14.397Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Large groups, property (τ) and the homology growth of subgroups

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

MARC LACKENBY
MARC LACKENBY*
Affiliation:
Mathematical Institute, University of Oxford, 24-29 St Giles', Oxford OX1 3LB. e-mail: lackenby@maths.ox.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

We investigate the homology of finite index subgroups Gi of a given finitely presented group G. We fix a prime p, denote the field of order p by p and define dp(Gi) to be the dimension of H1(Gi; p). We will be interested in the situation where dp(Gi) grows fast as a function of the index [G : Gi]. Specifically, we say that a collection of finite index subgroups {Gi} has linear growth of mod p homology if infidp(Gi)/[G : Gi] is positive. This is a natural and interesting condition that arises in several different contexts. For example, the main theorem of [9] states that when G is a lattice in PSL(2, ℂ) with non-trivial torsion (equivalently, G is the fundamental group of a finite-volume hyperbolic 3-orbifold with non-empty singular locus), then G has such a sequence of subgroups. Another major class of groups G having such a collection of subgroups are those that are large. By definition, this means that G has a finite index subgroup that admits a surjective homomorphism onto a free non-abelian group. Large groups have many nice properties, for example super-exponential subgroup growth and infinite virtual first Betti number. One might wonder whether largeness is equivalent to the existence of some nested sequence of finite index subgroups {Gi} with linear growth of mod p homology for some prime p. If so, this would establish that lattices in PSL(2, ℂ) with non-trivial torsion are large, which would be a major breakthrough in low-dimensional topology.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 146 , Issue 3 , May 2009 , pp. 625 - 648
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Baumslag, G.Wreath products and finitely presented groups. Math. Z. 75 (1960/1961), 22–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Bourgain, J. and Gamburd, A.Uniform expansion bounds for Cayley graphs of SL(2, p). Ann. of Math. 167 (2008), no. 2, 625–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Bourgain, J., Gamburd, A. and Sarnak, P.Sieving and expanders. C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris 343 (2006), no. 3, 155–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Clozel, L.Démonstration de la conjecture τ. Invent. Math. 151 (2003), no. 2, 297–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Ershov, M.Golod–Shafarevich groups with Property (T) and Kac–Moody groups. Duke. Math. J. 145 (2008), 309–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Justesen, J.A class of constructive asymptotically good algebraic codes. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory IT-18 (1972), 652–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Lackenby, M.Heegaard splittings, the virtually Haken conjecture and property τ. Invent. Math. 164 (2006), 317–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Lackenby, M.Expanders, rank and graphs of groups. Israel J. Math. 146 (2005), 357–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Lackenby, M.Covering spaces of 3-orbifolds. Duke Math J. 136 (2007), 181–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Lubotzky, A.Discrete groups, expanding graphs and invariant measures. Prog. in Math. 125 (1994).Google Scholar
[11]Lubotzky, A.Free quotients and the first Betti number of some hyperbolic manifolds. Transform. Groups 1 (1996), no. 1-2, 71–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Lubotzky, A.Eigenvalues of the Laplacian, the first Betti number and the congruence subgroup problem. Ann. of Math. 144 (1996), 441–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Lubotzky, A. and Pak, I.The product replacement algorithm and Kazhdan's property (T). J. Amer. Math. Soc. 14 (2001), 347–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Lubotzky, A. and Segal, D.Subgroup growth. Progr. in Math. 212 (2003).Google Scholar
[15]Lubotzky, A. and Weiss, B.Groups and expanders. Expanding graphs (Princeton, 1992), 95–109, DIMACS Ser. Discrete Math. Theoret. Comput. Sci. 10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16]Lubotzky, A. and Zimmer, R.Variants of Kazhdan's property for subgroups of semisimple groups. Israel J. Math. 66 (1989), 289–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17]Spielman, D.Constructing error-correcting codes from expander graphs. Emerging applications of number theory (Minneapolis, 1996), 591–600, IMA Vol. Math. Appl. 109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar