Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-sh8wx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T18:34:04.535Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Function space topologies defined by sectional integrals and applications to an extremal problem

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

K. J. Falconer
K. J. Falconer
Affiliation:
Corpus Christi College, Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Let H(t, θ) be the hyperplane in Rn (n ≥ 2) which is perpendicular to the unit vector θ, and distant t from the origin; that is H(t, θ) = {x ε Rn: x.θ = t}. (Note that H(t, θ) and H(−t, − θ) are the same hyperplane.) If f(x) εℒ1(Rn), we will denote the integral of f with respect to (n − 1)-dimensional Lebesgue measure over H(t, θ) by F(t, θ), termed the projection or sectional integral of f over H(t,θ). By Fubini's theorem, F(t, θ) exists for almost all t for any θ. Throughout this paper we will assume that f(x) has support in X, a compact convex subset of Rn. In Section 2 we examine some of the topologies that may be defined on functions on X in terms of the F(t, θ), and in the remainder of the paper we examine the extremal problem suggested by Croft (4), that of maximizing the integral of f over the set X with the constraint that the F(t, θ) are uniformly bounded above. We examine in particular how the extremal values depend on the convex set X. In the final section the extremal problem is related to a generalization of Bang's plank theorem and the theory of capacities, and several conjectures are proposed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 87 , Issue 1 , January 1980 , pp. 81 - 96
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Bang, Th.A solution to the plank problem. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 2 (1951), 990–993.Google Scholar
(2)Besicovitch, A. S.A uniqueness theorem and a problem on integration. J. London Math. Soc. 33 (1958), 82–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(3)Croft, H. T.Note on a plane measure problem. Mathematika 5 (1958), 125–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(4)Croft, H. T.Research problems in pure mathematics. Mimeographed notes.Google Scholar
(5)De Guzmán, M.Differentiation of integrals in Rn (Berlin, Heidelberg and New York, Springer-Verlag, 1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(6)Dunford, N. and Schwartz, J. T.Linear operators, volume I (New York, Interscience, 1958).Google Scholar
(7)Du Plessis, N.An introduction to potential theory (Edinburgh and London, Oliver & Boyd, 1970).Google Scholar
(8)Eggleston, H. G.Convexity (University Press, Cambridge, 1969).Google Scholar
(9)Falconer, K. J.The determination of a function from its projections. Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 85 (1979), 351–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(10)Green, J. W.On the determination of a function in the plane by its integrals over straight lines. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 9 (1958), 758–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(11)Rudin, W.Functional analysis (New York, McGraw-Hill, 1973).Google Scholar
(12)Smith, K. T., Solmon, D. C. and Wagner, S. L.Practical and mathematical aspects of the problem of reconstructing objects from radiographs. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 83 (1977), 1227–1270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar