Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T06:14:29.076Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Boolean Biology: Introducing Boolean Networks and Finite Dynamical Systems Models to Biology and Mathematics Courses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2011

R. Robeva*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematical Sciences, Sweet Briar College, Sweet Briar, VA 24595, USA
B. Kirkwood
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematical Sciences, Sweet Briar College, Sweet Briar, VA 24595, USA
R. Davies
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Sweet Briar College, Sweet Briar, VA 24595, USA
*
Corresponding author. E-mail: robeva@sbc.edu
Get access

Abstract

Since the release of the Bio 2010 report in 2003, significant emphasis has been placed on initiating changes in the way undergraduate biology and mathematics courses are taught and on creating new educational materials to facilitate those changes. Quantitative approaches, including mathematical models, are now considered critical for the education of the next generation of biologists. In response, mathematics departments across the country have initiated changes to their introductory calculus sequence, adding models, projects, and examples from the life sciences, or offering specialized calculus courses for biology majors. However, calculus-based models and techniques from those courses have been slow to propagate into the traditional general biology courses. And although modern biology has generated exciting opportunities for applications of a broad spectrum of mathematical theories, the impact on the undergraduate mathematics courses outside of the calculus/ordinary differential equations sequence has been minimal at best. Thus, the limited interdisciplinary cross-over between the undergraduate mathematics and biology curricula has remained stubbornly stagnant despite ongoing calls for integrated approaches.

We think that this phenomenon is due primarily to a lack of appropriate non-calculus-based interdisciplinary educational materials rather than inaccessibility of the essential underlying mathematical and biology concepts. Here we present a module that uses Boolean network models of the lac operon regulatory mechanism as an introduction to the conceptual importance of mathematical models and their analysis. No mathematics background beyond high school algebra is necessary to construct the model, which makes the approach particularly appropriate for introductory biology and mathematics courses. Initially the module focuses on modeling via Boolean logic, Boolean algebra, discrete dynamical systems, and directed graphs. The analysis of the model, however, leads to interesting advanced mathematical questions involving polynomial ideals and algebraic varieties that are beyond the mathematical proficiency of most biology students but are of interest in advanced level abstract algebra courses. These questions can also be used to map a path toward further research-level problems. All computations are carried out by computational algebra systems and the advanced mathematical theory implemented by the software can be covered in detail in abstract algebra courses with mathematics students. Biology students and students in lower level mathematic courses, on the other hand, can view the implementation as a “black box” and focus on the interpretation and the implications of the output.

The module is available from the authors for classroom testing and adoption.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© EDP Sciences, 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIO2010: Transforming undergraduate education for future research biologists. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2003.
C. Neuhauser. Calculus for biology and medicine, 2nd ed. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2003.
F. Adler. Modeling the dynamics of life: Calculus and Probability for life scientists, 2nd ed. Thompson, Belmont, CA, 2005.
J. Cohen. Mathematics is biology’s next microscope, only better; Biology is mathematics’ next physics, only better. PLoS Biol., 2 (2004), No. 12, e439. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0020439.
D. Cox, J. Little, D. O’Shea. Ideals, varieties, and algorithms: An introduction to computational algebraic geometry and commutative algebra, 3rd edition. Springer, New York, 2007.
Jacob, F., Monod, J.. Genetic regulatory mechanisms in the synthesis of proteins. J. Mol. Biol., 3 (1961), 318356. CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
J. Gallian. Contemporary abstract algebra, 6th edition. New York, Houghton Mifflin Company, 2006.
Kauffman, S.. Metabolic stability and epigenesis in randomly connected nets. J. Theor. Biol., 22 (1969), 437467. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laubenbacher, R., Sturmfels, B.. Computer algebra in systems biology. The American Mathematical Monthly, 116 (2009), No. 10, 882891. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathematical Biosciences Institute (MBI) Current Topic Workshop: Mathematical Developments Arising from Biology. November 8-10, 2009.
A New Biology for the 21st century. Committee on a New Biology for the 21st century: Ensuring the United States leads the coming biology revolution. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2009.
R. Robeva, J. Kirkwood, R. Davies, M. Johnson, L. Farhy, B. Kovatchev, M. Straume. An invitation to biomathematics. Academic Press, Burlington, MA, 2008.
Robeva, R., Laubenbacher, R.. Mathematical biology education: beyond calculus. Science, 325 (2009), 542543. CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
R. Robeva, R. Davies, T. Hodge, and A. Enyedy. Mathematical biology modules based on modern molecular biology and modern discrete mathematics. CBE - LSE, 9 (2010), Fall, 227–240.
Robeva, R.. Systems Biology - old concepts, new science, new challenges. Front. Psychiatry, 1 (2010), No. 1, 12. doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2010.00001 Google ScholarPubMed
Saez-Rodriguez, J., Simeoni, L., Lindquist, J., Hemenway, R., Bommhardt, U., Arndt, B., Haus, U., Weismantel, R., Gilles, E., Klamt, S., Schraven, B.. A logical model provides insights into T cell receptor signaling, PLoS Comp. Biol., 3 (2007), No. 8, e163. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030163. CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
A. Samal, S. Jain. The regulatory network of E. coli metabolism as a Boolean dynamical system exhibits both homeostasis and flexibility of response. BMC Systems Biology, 2, (2008), Article 21. doi:10.1186/1752-0509-2-21
Santillan, M., Mackey, M., Zeron, E.. Origin of bistability in the lac operon. Biophys. J., 92 (2007), 38303842. CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Santillan, M., Mackey, M.. Quantitative approaches to the study of bistability in the lac operon of Escherichia coli. J. R. Soc. Interface, 5 (2008), S29-S39 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
B. Stigler, A. Veliz-Cuba. Network topology as a driver of bistability in the lac operon. Available at http://arxiv.org/abs/0807.3995.
Yildrim, N., Mackey, M.. Feedback regulation in the lactose operon: a mathematical modeling study and comparison with experimental data. Biophys. J., 84 (2003), 28412851. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, R., Shah, M., Yang, J., Nyland, S., Liu, X., Yun, J., Albert, R., Loughran, T.. Network model of survival signaling in large granular lymphocyte leukemia. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 105 (2008), 1630816313.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed